The authors compared the injury diagnoses and Injury Severity Scores (ISSs) generated by three data-collection and -coding methods, and examined the times needed and costs associated with the methods. One method involved direct electronic entry of injury data by a physician in the admitting area. Codes, severity scores, and times and costs varied significantly with the different methods, thus suggesting a need for further study of the derivation of injury severity codes.
BakerS.P.O'NeillB.HaddonW.LongWB. The Injury Severity Score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma.1974; 14: 187–96.
2.
Committee on Trauma. Resources for optimal care of the injured patient.Chicago: American College of Surgeons, 1990.
3.
PorriesS.E.GamelliR.L.PilcherD.B.Practical evaluation of trauma deaths. J Trauma.1989; 29: 1607–10.
4.
Committee on Injury Scaling. Abbreviated Injury Scale—1990 revision.Des Plaines, IL: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, 1990.
5.
Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities.The international classification of diseases, 9th revision—clinical modification.Ann Arbor, MI, 1980.
6.
MacKenzieE.J.SteinwachsD.M.ShankarBS. Classifying trauma severity based on hospital discharge diagnoses: validation of an ICD-9CM to AIS-85 conversion table. Med Care.1989; 27: 412–22.
7.
MacKenzieE.J.ShapiroS.EasthamJN. The Abbreviated Injury Scale and Injury Severity Score: levels of inter- and intrarater reliability. Med Care.1985; 23: 823–35.
