Arkes HR, Wortmann RC, Saville PD, et al: Hindsight bias among physicians weighing the likelihood of diagnoses . J Appl Psychol66:584-588, 1981
2.
Christensen-Szalanski Jjj: Improving the practical utility of judgment research. In: Brehmer B, Jungermann H, Lourens P, et al (eds): New Directions for Research in Judgment and Decision Making . New York, North-Holland, 1986, pp 383-410
3.
Christensen-Szalanski Jjj, Boyce WT, Harrill H., et al: Informed consent and circumcision: is more information always better? Med Care25:856-867, 1986
4.
Christensen-Szalanski Jjj, Fobian CS: Some practical implications of the hindsight bias: a meta-analysis. Proc Acad Manage (in press)
5.
Cohen J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (revised ed.). New York, Academic Press, 1977
6.
Dawson NV, Arkes HR, Siciliano C., et al: Hindsight bias: an impediment to accurate probability estimation in clinicopathologic conferences. Med Decis Making8:000-000, 1988
7.
Detmer DE, Fryback DG, Gassner K.: heuristics and biases in medical decision-making. J Med Educ53:682-683, 1978
8.
Feinstein AR : Clinical biostatistics—IX: how do we measure "safety" and "efficacy"? Clin Pharmacol Ther12:544-558, 1971
9.
Feinstein AR : Clinical biostatistics—XXVII: the derangements of the "range of normal." Clin Parmacol Ther15:528-540, 1974
10.
Rosenthal R. : Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1984
11.
Rossi P., Wright S.: Evaluation research: an assessment of theory, practice, and politics . Eval Q1:5-52, 1977
12.
Wolf FM: Meta-Analysis. Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1986