Climo LH: Some thorny medical judgments and their outcomes. The view from the public mental hospital. Med Decis Making4:415-424, 1984
2.
Zarin DA, Plante DA, Kassirer JP, Pauker SG: Experience with a consultative service in clinical decision making . Paper presented to the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making, Toronto, October 1983. Abstract in Med Decis Making 3:371, 1983
3.
Buie DH: Empathy. Its nature and limitations. J Am Psychoanal Assoc29:281-307, 1981
Raiffa H.: Theories of decision making and medical practice. Keynote Address to the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making, Boston, October 1982
6.
Bursztajn H. , Hamm RM, Gutheil TG, Brodsky A.: The decision-analytic approach to medical malpractice law. Formal proposals and informal syntheses . Med Decis Making4:401-414, 1984
7.
Hammond KR: The integration of research in judgment and decision theory. Report No. 226 . Boulder CO: Center for Research on Judgment and Policy, University of Colorado, 1980
8.
Hammond KR: Principles of organization in intuitive and analytical cognition. Report No. 231. Boulder CO: Center for Research on Judgment and Policy, University of Colorado, 1981
9.
Bursztajn H. , Hamm RM: The clinical utility of utility assessment . Med Decis Making2:161-165, 1982
10.
Hammond KR, Hamm RM, Grassia J., Pearson T.: The relative efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition. A second direct comparison. Report No. 252. Boulder CO: Center for Research on Judgment and Policy, University of Colorado , 1984
11.
Hammond KR: Toward increasing competence of thought in public policy formation . In, Hammond KR, ed: Judgment and Decision in Public Policy Formation. Boulder CO: Westview, 1978, pp 11-32
12.
Hammond KR, Hamm RM, Fisch H-U., Joyce Crb: Differential contributions of two forms of cognitive science to medical decision making. Paper presented to the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making, Boston, October 1982. Abstract in Med Decis Making 2:358, 1982
13.
Hammond KR, Hamm RM: Thoughts on the acquisition and application of medical knowledge. In, Friedman CP, Purcell EF, eds: The New Biology and Medical Education. Merging the Biological, Information, and Cognitive Sciences. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr., Foundation, 1983, pp 190-197
14.
Tversky A.: Intransitivity of preferences. Psychol Rev76:31-48, 1969
15.
Luce RD: Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica24:146-159, 1956
16.
Ng Y-K :Sub-semiorder. A model of multidimensional choice with preference intransitivity. J Math Psychol16:51-59, 1977
17.
Raiffa H.: Decision Analysis. Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty . Reading MA: Addison-Wesley, 1968
18.
Shanteau J.: The concept of weight in judgment and decision making. A review and some unifying proposals. Report No. 228. Boulder CO: Center for Research on Judgment and Policy, University of Colorado , 1980
19.
Bursztajn H., Feinbloom RI, Hamm RM, Brodsky A.: Medical Choices, Medical Chances. How Patients, Families and Physicians Can Cope with Uncertainty. New York: Delacorte, 1981
20.
Gutheil TG, Bursztajn H., Brodsky A.: Malpractice prevention through the sharing of uncertainty. Informed consent and the therapeutic alliance. N Engl J Med311:49-51, 1984
21.
Light D.: Becoming Psychiairists. New York: Norton, 1982
22.
Lidz C., et al: Informed Consent. A Study of Decision Making in Psychiatry. New York: Guilford Press, 1984
23.
Clark J.: The conversational art of diagnosis. The social construction of medical facts . PhD dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, 1984
24.
Frankel RM, Beckman HB: IMPACT. An interaction-based method for preserving and analyzing clinical transactions. In, Pettegrew LS, ed: Explorations in Provider and Patient Interaction. Louisville, KY: Humana, Inc., 1982
25.
Buckholdt DR , Gubrium JF: Doing staffings. Hum Organ38:255-264, 1979
26.
Sacks H., Schegloff E., Jefferson G.: A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation . Language50:696-735, 1974
27.
Sudnow D.: Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Free Press, 1972
28.
Fisher S, Todd AD, eds: The Social Organization of Doctor-Patient Communication. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1983
29.
Edwards W.: Use of multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making . In, Bell DE, Keeney RL, Raiffa H, eds: Conflicting Objectives in Decision. New York: Wiley, 1977, pp 247-276
30.
Slovic P., Lichtenstein S.: Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment. Organ Behav Hum Perform6:649-744, 1971
31.
Cook RL, Stewart TR: A comparison of seven methods for obtaining subjective description of judgmental policy. Organ Behav Human Perform13:31-45, 1975
32.
Keeney RL: The art of assessing multiattribute utility functions. Organ Behav Human Perform19:267-310, 1977
33.
Gabrielli WF , von Winterfeldt D.: Are importance weights sensitive to the range of alternatives in multiattribute utility measurement? Research Report 78-6. Los Angeles : Social Science Research Institute, University of Southern California, 1978
34.
Meehl P.: Specific etiology and other forms of strong influence. Some quantitative meanings . J Philos2:33-53, 1977
35.
Stewart TR, Ely DW: Range sensitivity. A necessary condition and a test for the validity of weights . Boulder Colorado: National Center for Atmospheric Research, 1984
36.
Anderson NH : Methods of Information Integration Theory . New York: Academic, 1982
37.
Hammond KR, McClelland GH, Mumpower J.: Human Judgment and Decision Making. Theories, Methods, and Procedures . New York: Praeger, 1980
38.
Janis IL, Mann L.: Decision Making. A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment . New York: Free Press , 1977, pp 45-202
39.
Slovic P., Lichtenstein S., Edwards W.: Boredom-induced changes in preferences among bets. Am J Psychol78:208-217, 1965
40.
Eisenberg JM , Hershey JC: Derived thresholds. Determining the diagnostic probabilities at which clinicians initiate testing and treatment . Med Decis Making3:155-168, 1983
41.
Hammond KR, Summers DA, Deane DH: Negative effects of outcome-feedback in multiple-cue probability learning . Organ Behav Hum Perform9:30-34, 1973
