Hobbs B.: Analytical Multiobjective Decision Methods for Power Plant Siting. A Review of Theory and Applications. Brookhaven NY: Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1979
7.
Johnson E., Huber G.: The technology of utility assessment. IEEE Trans Syst Man and Cybern7:311-325, 1977
8.
Baird JC, Noma E.: Fundamentals of Scaling and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1978
9.
Torgerson WS: Theory and Methods of Scaling. New York: Wiley, 1958
10.
Kneppreth N. , Gustafson D., Leifer R., Johnson E.: Techniques for the assessment of worth (Technical Paper 254)Arlington VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1974
11.
Edwards W., Guttentag M., Snapper K.: Effective evaluation. A decision theoretic approach. In, Guttentag M, ed: Handbook of Evaluation Research . Beverly Hills CA: Sage, 1975
12.
Bush JW, Chen MM, Patrick DL: Cost-effectiveness using a health status index. Analysis of the New York State PKU Screening Program. In, Berg R, ed: Health Status Indexes. Chicago : Hospital Research and Educational Trust, 1973
13.
Torrance GW : Social preferences for health states. An empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Socioecon Plann Sci10:129-136, 1976
14.
Pliskin JS, Shepard DS, Weinstein MD: Utility function for life years and health status. Oper Res28:206-224, 1980
15.
Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Sutherland HJ, Tibshirani R., et al: The measurement of patients' values in medicine. Med Decis Making2:449-462, 1982
16.
McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Sox HC, Tversky A.: On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med306:1259-1262, 1982
17.
Tversky A., Kahneman D.: The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science211:453-458, 1981
18.
Bradburn NM : Question-wording effects in surveys. In, Hogarth RM, ed: Question Framing and Response Consistency . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982
19.
Cannell CF, Marguis K., Laurent A.: A summary of studies of interviewing methodology (DHEW publication (NIH) 69). Vital and Health Statistics. Series 2, Data Evaluation and Methods Research , 1977
20.
Hershey JC, Kunrather HG, Schoemaker Pjh: Sources of bias in assessment procedures for utility functions. Manage Science28:936-954, 1981
21.
Wolfson A., Sinclair A., Bombardier C., McGeer A.: Preference measures for functional status in strobe patients. Interrater and intertechnique comparisons. In, Kane RL , Kane RA, eds: Values and Long-Term Care. Lexington MA: Lexington Books, 1982
22.
Krzysztofowicz R.: Strength of preference and risk attitude in utility measurement. Organ Behav Hum Perform31:88-113, 1983
23.
Quinn RJ: The effect of measurement method on preference scales in a medical decision making context (abstr). Med Decis Making1:431, 1981
24.
Fischer GW: Multidimensional utility models for risky and riskless choice. Organ Behav Hum Perform17:127-146, 1976
25.
Fischer GW: Convergent validation of decomposed multiattribute utility assessment procedures for risky and riskless decisions. Organ Behav Hum Perform18:295-315, 1977
26.
von Winterfeldt D., Edwards W.: Error in decision analysis. How to create the possibility of large losses by using dominated strategies (Technical Report 75-4). Social Science Research Institute, University of Southern California, 1975
27.
Patrick CL, Bush JW, Chen MM: Methods for measuring levels of well-being for a health status index . Health Serv Res8:228-245, 1975
28.
Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC: Health status. Types of validity for an index of well-being. Health Serv Res11:478-507, 1976
29.
Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC: Health status index. Category rating versus magnitude estimation for measuring levels of well-being. Med Care5:501-523, 1979
30.
Anderson NH , Shanteau J.: Weak inference with linear models . Psychol Bull84:1155-1170, 1977
31.
Pauker SG: Coronary artery surgery. The use of decision analysis. Ann Intern Med85:8-18, 1976
32.
Pliskin JS, Stason WB, Weinstein MC, et al: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Clinical decision making and cost-effectivenes analysis. Med Decis Making1:10-28, 1981
33.
Keppel G.: Design and Analysis. A Researcher's Handbook. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973
34.
Parducci A. : Contextual effects. A range-frequency analysis . In, Carterette E, Friedman M , eds: Handbook of Perception , Vol II. New York: Academic, 1974
35.
Ciampi A., Silberfeld M., Till JE: Measurement of individual preferences. The importance of "situation-specific" variables. Med Decis Making2:483-495, 1982
36.
Bell DE: Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper Res10:961-981, 1982
37.
Fischhoff B. , Slovic P., Lichtenstein S.: Knowing what you want. Measuring labile values. In, T Wallsten, ed: Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum , 1980