Dorfman DD, Alf E Jr: Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory and determination of confidence intervals. Rating method data. J Math Psychol6:487-496, 1969
5.
Bamber D.: The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph. J Math Psychol12:387-415, 1975
6.
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology143:29-36, 1982
7.
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: Method for comparing the area under two ROC curves derived from the same cases . Radiology148:839-843, 1983
8.
Metz CE, Kronman HB: Statistical significance tests for binormal ROC curves. J Math Psychol22:218-243, 1980
9.
Metz CE, Kronman HB: A test for the statistical significance of differences between ROC curves . Inserm88:647-660, 1979
10.
Metz CE, Wang P-L., and Kronman HB: A new approach for testing the significance of differences between ROC curves measured from correlated data. In, Deconick F, ed: Information Processing in Medical Imaging VIII. The Hague: Martinus Nijhof , 1984
11.
Fleiss J., Davis M.: Jackknifing functions of multinomial frequencies, with an application to a measure of concordance. Am J Epidemiol115:841-845, 1982
12.
Efron B.: Bootstrap methods. Another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat7:1-26, 1979
13.
McNeil BJ, Sanders R., Alderson PO, et al: A prospective study of computed tomography, ultrasound and gallium imaging in patients with fever. Radiology139:647-653, 1981
14.
McNeil BJ, Hanley JA, Funkenstein HH, Wallman J.: The use of paired ROC curves in studying the impact of history on radiography interpretation. CT of the head as a case study. Radiology149:75-77, 1983
