Pulmonary technology task force report. NIH Publication 81-2110, US Dep Health and Human Services, Washington DC, 1981 pp 101-113
2.
Adelstein SJ , McNeil BJ: A new diagnostic test for pulmonary embolism. How good and how costly? N Engl J Med299:305-309, 1978
3.
Nichols AB, Cochavi S., Hales CA, et al: Scintigraphic detection of pulmonary emboli by serial positron imaging of inhaled 15 0-labeled carbon dioxide. N Engl J Med299:279-284, 1978
4.
Holman BL, Lindeman JF, eds: Regional pulmonary function in health and disease. Prog Nucl Med3:1973
5.
Guter M, ed: Newer radiogases in practice. Prog Nucl Med5:1978
6.
The urokinase-pulmonary embolism trial. A national cooperative study. Monograph 39. New York: Amer Heart Assn, 1973
Wigton RS, Patil KD, Hoellerich V.: How faculty, residents, and students use clinical information to diagnose pulmonary embolism. (Abs)Med Decis Making1:444, 1982
9.
Griner PF, Mayewski RJ, Mushlin AI, Greenland P.: Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. III. Application of principles of test selection. Ann Intern Med94:575-577, 1981
10.
Cheely R., McCartney WH, Perry JR, et al: The role of non-invasive tests versus pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Med70:17-22, 1981
11.
Swets JA, Pickett RM: Evaluation of diagnostic systems. New York: Academic, 1982, pp 55-58
12.
Hoop B., Metz CE: Operability of nuclear instruments for medical use in developing countries. A decision-analytic approach. Med Decis Making1:247-263, 1981
13.
Viamonte M. , Koople H., Janowitz W., Hildner F.: Pulmonary thromboembolism. Update. JAMA243:2229-2234, 1980
14.
Bell WR: Pulmonary embolism. Progress and problems. Am J Med72:181-183, 1982