IPDAS. International Patient Decision Aids (IPDAS) Collaboration. Available from: http://ipdas.ohri.ca/
2.
StaceyDLégaréFLewisK, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4(4):CD001431.
3.
President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. US Code Annot US 1982, Title 42 Sect. 300v as added 1978.
4.
O’ConnorAMTugwellPWellsGA, et al. A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;33:267–79.
5.
O’ConnorAM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:25–30.
6.
O’ConnorAMStaceyDRovnerD, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD001431.
7.
O’ConnorAMStaceyDEntwistleV, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD001431.
8.
ElwynGO’ConnorAStaceyD, et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006;333:417.
9.
O’ConnorAMBennettCStaceyD, et al. Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Decis Making. 2007;27:554–74.
10.
ElwynGO’ConnorAMBennettC, et al. Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi). PLoS One. 2009;4:e4705.
11.
Joseph-WilliamsNNewcombeRPolitiM, et al. Toward minimum standards for certifying patient decision aids: a modified Delphi consensus process. Med Decis Making. 2014;34:699–710.
12.
VolkRJLlewellyn-ThomasHStaceyDElwynG. Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2013;13(Suppl. 2):S1.
13.
LewisKBWoodBSepuchaKRThomsonRGStaceyD. Quality of reporting of patient decision aids in recent randomized controlled trials: a descriptive synthesis and comparative analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100:1387–93.
14.
SepuchaKRAbhyankarPHoffmanAS, et al. Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluation studies: the development of SUNDAE Checklist. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27:380–8.
15.
HärterMMoumjidNCornuzJElwynGvan der WeijdenT. Shared decision making in 2017: international accomplishments in policy, research and implementation. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundheitswes. 2017;123:1–5.
16.
ElwynGSchollITietbohlC, et al. “Many miles to go . . .”: a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2013;13(Suppl. 2):S14.
17.
Zikmund-FisherBJFagerlinAUbelPA. A demonstration of “less can be more” in risk graphics. Med Decis Making. 2010;30:661–71.
18.
Zikmund-FisherBJ. The right tool is what they need, not what we have: a taxonomy of appropriate levels of precision in patient risk communication. Med Care Res Rev. 2013;70:37s–49s.
19.
BekkerHL. The loss of reason in patient decision aid research: do checklists damage the quality of informed choice interventions?Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78:357–64.
20.
SchollILaRussaAHahlwegPKobrinSElwynG. Organizational- and system-level characteristics that influence implementation of shared decision-making and strategies to address them—a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2018;13:40.
