Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Shared decision making (SDM) and decision aids (DAs) increase patients’ involvement in health care decisions and enhance satisfaction with their choices. Studies of SDM and DAs have primarily occurred in academic centers and large health systems, but most primary care is delivered in smaller practices, and over 20% of Americans live in rural areas, where poverty, disease prevalence, and limited access to care may increase the need for SDM and DAs.

Objective

To explore perceptions and practices of rural primary care clinicians regarding SDM and DAs.

Design

Cross-sectional survey.

Setting and Participants

Primary care clinicians affiliated with the Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network.

Results

Surveys were returned by 181 of 231 eligible participants (78%); 174 could be analyzed. Two-thirds of participants were physicians, 84% practiced family medicine, and 55% were male. Sixty-five percent of respondents were unfamiliar with the term shared decision making, but following definition, 97% reported that they found the approach useful for conditions with multiple treatment options. Over 90% of clinicians perceived helping patients make decisions regarding chronic pain and health behavior change as moderate/hard in difficulty. Although 69% of respondents preferred that patients play an equal role in making decisions, they estimate that this happens only 35% of the time. Time was reported as the largest barrier to engaging in SDM (63%). Respondents were receptive to using DAs to facilitate SDM in print- (95%) or web-based formats (72%), and topic preference varied by clinician specialty and decision difficulty.

Conclusions

Rural clinicians recognized the value of SDM and were receptive to using DAs in multiple formats. Integration of DAs to facilitate SDM in routine patient care may require addressing practice operation and reimbursement.

Keywords

primary care translating research into practice shared decision making decision aid tools survey methods statistical methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

O’Connor

Llewellyn-Thomas

Flood

. Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004(Suppl variation):63–72.

Obermeyer

Reynolds

Price

Abraham

. Therapeutic decisions for menopause: results of the DAMES project in central Massachusetts. Menopause. 2004;11(4):456–65.

Feldman-Stewart

Brundage

Hayter

. What questions do patients with curable prostate cancer want answered? Med Decis Making. 2000;20(1):7–19.

Jani

Hellman

. Early prostate cancer: clinical decision- making. Lancet. 2003;361(9362):1045–53.

Fraenkel

Bogardus

Jr Concato

Wittink

. Treatment options in knee osteoarthritis: the patient’s perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(12):1299–304.

Legare

. Establishing patient decision aids in primary care: update on the knowledge base. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2008;102(7):427–30.

Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making. Informing and involving patients in medical decisions: the primary care physicians’ perspective. Available from: URL: http://www.informedmedicaldecisions.org/pdfs/FinalwhitepaperPCPSurvey.pdf

Epstein

Peters

. Beyond information: exploring patients’ preferences. JAMA. 2009;302(2):195–7.

O’Connor

Bennett

Stacey

. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3:CD001431.

10.

O’Connor

Wennberg

Legare

. Toward the “tipping point”: decision aids and informed patient choice. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(3):716–25.

11.

Kuehn

. States explore shared decision making. JAMA. 2009;301(24):2539–41.

12.

Woolf

Chan

Harris

. Promoting informed choice: transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(4):293–300.

13.

Hing

Burt

. Characteristics of office-based physicians and their medical practices: United States, 2005–2006. Vital Health Stat 13. 2008;166:1–34.

14.

US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Census 2000 population statistics. Available from: URL: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/census/cps2k.htm

15.

Health, Resources, and Services Administration. HRSA data warehouse. Available from: URL: http://datawarehouse.hrsa.gov/

16.

DeNavas-Walt

Proctor

Smith

. Current Population Reports, P60-235, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2007. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2008.

17.

Lenardson

Ziller

Cobern

Anderson

. Profile of Rural Health Insurance Coverage: A Chartbook. Portland, ME: University of Southern Main, Muskie School of Public Service, Main Rural Health Research Center; 2009.

18.

Crooks

. Food consumption, activity, and overweight among elementary school children in an Appalachian Kentucky community. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000;112(2):159–70.

19.

Wilson

Flowers

Rudiver

Glen

Dunn

. Assessment of health risk behaviors among teens in an Appalachian community. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:S019.

20.

Bennett

Olatosi

Probst

. Health Disparities: A Rural-Urban Chartbook. Columbia, South Carolina: South Carolina Rural Health Research Center; 2008.

21.

Pleis

Lethbridge-Cejku

. Summary Health Statistics for US Adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2006 [Vital Health Statistics 10-235]. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2007.

22.

Higginbotham

Moulder

Currier

. Rural v. urban aspects of cancer: First-year data from the Mississippi Central Cancer Registry. Fam Community Health. 2001;24(2):1–9.

23.

Fagnan

Morris

Shipman

Holub

King

Angier

. Characterizing a practice-based research network: Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network (ORPRN) survey tools. J Am Board Fam Med. 2007;20(2):204–19.

24.

Hart

Larson

Lishner

. Rural definitions for health policy and research. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(7):1149–55.

25.

Elwyn

Frosch

Volandes

Edwards

Montori

. Investing in deliberation: a definition and classification of decision support interventions for people facing difficult health decisions. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(6):701–11.

26.

Wilson

Wallin

Reiser

. Social stratification and the digital divide. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2003;21(2):133–43.

27.

Mills

Whitacre

. Understanding the non-metropolitan: metropolitan digital divide. Growth Change. 2003;34(2):219–43.

28.

Hale

Cotton

Drentea

Goldner

. Rural-urban differences in general and health-related Internet use. Am Behav Sci. 2010;53(9):1304–25.

29.

Legare

Ratte

Gravel

Graham

. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):526–35.

30.

Gravel

Legare

Graham

. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Implement Sci. 2006;1:16.

31.

Legare

St-Jacques

Gagnon

. Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a survey of willingness in women and physicians to engage in shared decision-making. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31(4):319–26.

32.

Meden

St John-Larkin

Hermes

Sommerschield

. Relationship between travel distance and utilization of breast cancer treatment in rural northern Michigan. JAMA. 2002;287(1):111.

33.

Wang

Middleton

Prosser

. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am J Med. 2003;114(5):397–403.

34.

Billings

. Promoting the dissemination of decision aids: an odyssey in a dysfunctional health care financing system. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004(Suppl variation):128–32.

35.

Kocher

Emanuel

Deparle

. The Affordable Care Act and the future of clinical medicine: the opportunities and challenges. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(8):536–9.

36.

Berwick

. Launching accountable care organizations: the proposed rule for the Medicare Shared Savings Program. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(16):e32.

37.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare Program; Medicare Shared Savings Program: accountable care organizations [42 CFR Part 425]. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2011.

38.

Jackson

Cheater

Reid

. A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisions. Health Expect. 2008;11(3):323–51.

39.

Fiks

Jimenez

. The promise of shared decision-making in paediatrics. Acta Pædiatrica. 2010;99(10):1464–6.

40.

Kocher

Sahni

. Hospitals’ race to employ physicians: the logic behind a money-losing proposition. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1790–3.

41.

Hing

Burt

. Office-based medical practices: methods and estimates from the national ambulatory medical care survey. Adv Data. 2007;383:1–15.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.10 MB

Perceptions of Shared Decision Making and Decision Aids Among Rural Primary Care Clinicians

Abstract

Background

Objective

Design

Setting and Participants

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material