PullenayegumEMTarrideJEXieFO’ReillyD. Calculating utility decrements associated with an adverse event: marginal tobit and CLAD coefficients should be used with caution . Med Decis Making. 2011;6:790–799.
2.
DrummondMFSculpherMJTorranceGWO’BrienBJStoddartGL. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK and New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
3.
PatrickDLStarksHECainKCUhlmannRFPearlmanRA. Measuring preferences for health states worse than death. Med Decis Making. 1994;14:9–18.
4.
GoldMRSiegelJERussellLBWeinsteinMC, eds. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
5.
SullivanPWGhushchyanV. Preference-based EQ-5D index scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:410–20.
6.
AustinPC. A comparison of methods for analyzing health-related quality-of-life measures. Value Health. 2002;5:329–37.
7.
FeenyDTorranceGFurlongW. Health Utilities Index. In: SpilkerB, editor. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Press; 1996.
8.
GrootendorstP. Censoring in statistical models of health status: what happens when one can do better than ‘1’. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:911–4.
9.
AustinPCEscobarMKopecJA. The use of the Tobit model for analyzing measures of health status. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:901–10.
10.
SullivanPWLawrenceWFJrGhushchyanV. A national catalogue of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the U.S.Medical Care. 2005;43:736–49.
11.
SullivanPWGhushchyanV. Mapping the EQ-5D index from the SF-12: US general population preferences in a nationally representative sample. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:401–9.
12.
SullivanPWSlejkoJFSculpherMJGhushchyanV. Catalogue of EQ-5D scores for the United Kingdom. Med Decis Making. 2011;6:800–804.