DansALDansLFGuyattGHRichardsonS, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guide to the medical literature, XIV: how to decide on the applicability of clinical trial results to your patients. JAMA. 1998;279:545–9.
2.
FletcherRHFletcherSW, eds. Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
3.
GuyattGHSackettDLCookDJ, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guide to the medical literature, II: how to use an article about therapy or prevention, part A: are the results of the study valid?JAMA. 1993;270:2598–601.
4.
CasperGRBrennanPF. Improving the quality of patient care: the role of patient preferences in the clinical record. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993;8–11.
5.
FairhurstKDowrickC. Problems with recruitment in a randomized controlled trial of counselling in general practice: causes and implications. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996;1:77–80.
6.
SchulzKFGrimesDA. Generation of allocation sequences in randomized trials: chance, not choice. Lancet. 2002;359(9305):515–9.
7.
McCafferyKJTurnerRMacaskillPWalterSDChanSFIrwigL. Determining the impact of informed choice: separating treatment effects from the effects of choice and selection in randomized trials. Med Decis Making. 2011;31:229–36.
8.
ColditzGAMillerJNMostellerF. How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy, I: medical. Stat Med. 1989;8:441–54.
9.
RyanRMDeciEL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55:68–78.
VisserPSCooperJ. Attitude change. In: HoggMACooperJ, eds. The Sage Handbook of Social Psychology. 1st ed. London, UK: Sage; 2003:211–31.
12.
SchumpeterJ. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. 3rd ed. New York: Harper & Row; 1950.
13.
PatzerGL. Experiment-Research Methodology in Marketing: Types and Applications. 1st ed. Westport, CT: Quorum Books; 1996.
14.
RedelmeierDAMolinJPTibshiraniRJ. A randomized trial of compassionate care for the homeless in an emergency department. Lancet. 1995;435(8958):1131–4.
15.
GuyattGHPugsleySOSullivanMJThompsonPJBermanLJonesNL. Effect of encouragement on walking test performance. Thorax. 1984;39:818–22.
16.
MillerWR. Motivational interviewing: research, practice, and puzzles. Addict Behav. 1996;21(6):835–42.
17.
OgedegbeGSchoenthalerARichardsonTLewisLBelueREspinosaE. An RCT of the effect of motivational interviewing on medication adherence in hypertensive African Americans: rationale and design. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28(2):169–181.
18.
SolomonDHGleesonTIversenMAvornJBrookhartMALiiJ. A blinded randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing to improve adherence with osteoporosis medications: design of the OPTIMA trial. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21(1):137–44.
19.
RuckerG. A two-stage trial design for testing treatment, self-selection and treatment preference effects. Stat Med. 1989;8(4):477–85.