Eden J, Wheatley B, McNeil B, Sox H, eds. Committee on Reviewing Evidence to Identify Highly Effective Clinical Services, Institute of Medicine. Knowing What Works in Health Care: A Roadmap for the Nation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2008. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12038. Accessed; 26 March 2010.
2.
Moynihan R., Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Paulsen E.Evidence-Informed Health Policy: Using Research to Make Health Systems Healthier . Rapport Nr 1-2008. Oslo: Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten .
3.
World Health Organization.WHA 58.34 Ministerial Summit on Health Research. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA58/WHA58_34-en.pdf.Accessed; 30 November 2009.
4.
UK Department of Health.Best Research for Best Health: A New National Health Research Strategy. 2006. Report 272605. Available from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4127127 . Accessed; 26 March 2010.
5.
Institute of Medicine (IOM).Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2009 . Available from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12648 . Accessed; 26 March 2010.
6.
Simera I., Altman DG, Moher D., Schulz KF, Hoey J.Guidelines for reporting health research: the EQUATOR network’s survey of guideline authors. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e139.
7.
PLoS Medicine Editors.Ensuring integrity in comparative effectiveness research: accentuate the negative . PLoS Med. 2009; 6:e1000152.