Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background. Experts have called for the inclusion of values clarification (VC) exercises in decision aids (DAs) as a means of improving their effectiveness, but little research has examined the effects of such exercises. Objective. To determine whether adding a VC exercise to a DA on heart disease prevention improves decision-making outcomes. Design. Randomized trial. Setting. UNC Decision Support Laboratory. Patients. Adults ages 40 to 80 with no history of cardiovascular disease. Intervention. A Web-based heart disease prevention DA with or without a VC exercise. Measurements. Pre- and postintervention decisional conflict and intent to reduce coronary heart disease (CHD) risk and postintervention self-efficacy and perceived values concordance. Results. The authors enrolled 137 participants (62 in DA; 75 in DA + VC with moderate decisional conflict (DA 2.4; DA + VC 2.5) and no baseline differences among groups. After the interventions, they found no clinically or statistically significant differences between groups in decisional conflict (DA 1.8; DA + VC 1.9; absolute difference VC—DA 0.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: —0.1 to 0.3), intent to reduce CHD risk (DA 98%; DA + VC 100%; absolute difference VC—DA: 2%, 95% CI: —0.02% to 5%), perceived values concordance (DA 95%; DA + VC 92%; absolute difference VC—DA —3%, 95% CI: —11% to +5%), or self-efficacy for risk reduction (DA 97%; DA + VC 92%; absolute difference VC—DA —5%, 95% CI: —13% to +3%). However, DA + VC tended to change some decisions about risk reduction strategies. Limitations. Use of a hypothetical scenario; ceiling effects for some outcomes. Conclusions. Adding a VC intervention to a DA did not further improve decision-making outcomes in a population of highly educated and motivated adults responding to scenario-based questions. Work is needed to determine the effects of VC on more diverse populations and more distal outcomes.

Keywords

risk stratification decision aids patient decision making provider decision making risk communication or risk perception shared decision making.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

O’Connor AM , Legare F. , Stacey D. Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids. BMJ. 2003;327: 736-40.

Sheridan SL , Harris RP , Woolf SH Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention: a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:56-66.

O’Connor AM , Stacey D. , Entwistle V. , et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD001431.

O’Connor AM , Bennett CL , Stacey D. , et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD001431.

Elwyn G. , O’Connor A. , Stacey D. , et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006;333:417.

International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration. IPDAS Collaboration Background Document [Web page]. 17 February 2005. Available from: http://www.ipdas.ohri.ca/IPDAS_Background.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2009.

Pignone M. , Sheridan SL , Lee YZ , et al. Heart to Heart: a computerized decision aid for assessment of coronary heart disease risk and the impact of risk-reduction interventions for primary prevention. Prev Cardiol. 2004 ;7:26-33.

Sheridan SL , Shadle J. , Simpson RJ Jr , Pignone MP The impact of a decision aid about heart disease prevention on patients’ discussions with their doctor and their plans for prevention: a pilot randomized trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6: 121.

Sheridan SL , Behrend L. , Vu MB , Meier A. , Griffith JM , Pignone MP Individuals’ responses to global CHD risk: a focus group study. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;76:233-9.

10.

Pasternak RC , Abrams J. , Greenland P. , Smaha LA , Wilson PW , Houston-Miller N.

34th Bethesda Conference: Task force #1-Identification of coronary heart disease risk: is there a detection gap?

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1863-74.

11.

Wilson PW , D’Agostino RB , Levy D. , Belanger AM , Silbershatz H. , Kannel WB Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998;97:1837-47.

12.

O’Connor AM User Manual-Decisional Conflict Scale [Web page]. 1999. Available from: http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_DecConflict2006.pdf . Accessed 30 May 2007.

13.

O’Connor AM User Manual-Decisional Conflict Scale [Web page]. 2005. Available from: http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_Decisional_Conflict.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2009.

14.

Davison BJ , Kirk P. , Degner LF , Hassard TH Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;37:255-63.

15.

Lalonde L. , O’Connor AM , Drake E. , Duguay P. , Lowensteyn I. , Grover SA Development and preliminary testing of a patient decision aid to assist pharmaceutical care in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Pharmacotherapy . 2004;24:909-22.

16.

O’Connor AM , Wells GA , Tugwell P. , Laupacis A. , Elmslie T. , Drake E. The effects of an ‘explicit’ values clarification exercise in a woman’s decision aid regarding postmenopausal hormone therapy. Health Expect. 1999;2:21-32.

17.

Holmes-Rovner M. , Kroll J. , Rovner DR , et al. Patient decision support intervention: increased consistency with decision analytic models. Med Care . 1999;37:270-84.

18.

Montgomery AA , Fahey T. , Peters TJ A factorial randomised controlled trial of decision analysis and an information video plus leaflet for newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. Br J Gen Pract. 2003 ;53:446-53.

19.

Driscoll DL , Rupert DJ , Golin CE , et al. Promoting prostate-specific antigen informed decision-making: evaluating two community-level interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35:87-94.

20.

Rothert ML , Holmes-Rovner M. , Rovner D. , et al. An educational intervention as decision support for menopausal women. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20:377-87.

21.

Dodin S. , Legare F. , Daudelin G. , Tetroe J. , O’Connor A. Making a decision about hormone replacement therapy. A randomized controlled trial [in French]. Can Fam Physician. 2001 ;47:1586-93.

Effect of Adding a Values Clarification Exercise to a Decision Aid on Heart Disease Prevention: A Randomized Trial

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References