Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background. The time tradeoff (TTO) method of preference elicitation allows respondents to value a state as worse than dead, generally either through the Torrance protocol or the Measurement and Valuation of Health (MVH) protocol. Both of these protocols have significant weaknesses: Valuations for states worse than dead (SWD) are elicited through procedures different from those for states better than dead (SBD), and negative values can be extremely negative. Purpose. To provide an account of the different TTO designs for SWD, to identify any alternatives to the MVH and Torrance approaches, and to consider the merits of the approaches identified. Methods. Medline was searched to identify all health state valuation studies employing TTO. The ways in which SWD were handled were recorded. Furthermore, to ensure that there are no unpublished but feasible TTO variants, the authors developed a theoretical framework for identifying all potential variants. Results. The search produced 593 hits, of which 218 were excluded. Of the remaining 375 articles, only 29 included protocols for SWD. Of these, 23 used the MVH protocol and 4 used the Torrance protocol. The other 2 used 1 protocol for SBD and SWD, one making use of lead time and the other using a 2-stage procedure with chaining. The systematic framework did not identify any alternatives to the Torrance and MVH protocols that were superior to the lead time approach. Conclusions. Few studies elicit values for SWD. The lead time approach is a potential alternative to the Torrance and MVH protocols. Key words: QALY; states worse than dead; health state valuation; preference elicitation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Drummond MF , Sculpher MJ , Torrance GW , O’Brien BJ , Stoddart GL Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford (UK): Oxford Medical Publications ; 2005.

Parkin D. , Devlin N. Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost utility analysis? Health Econ. 2006;15:653-64.

Torrance GW , Sackett D. , Thomas W. A utility maximisation model for evaluation of health care programmes . Health Serv Res. 1972;7(2):118-33.

Torrance GW Multi-attribute utility theory as a method of measuring social preferences for health states in long-term care. In: Kane R , Kane R , eds. Values and Long-term Care. Lexington (MA): Lexington Books; 1982. p 127-56.

Dolan P. Modelling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997;35(11):1095-108.

Brooks R. EuroQoL: the current state of play. Health Pol. 1996; 37:53-72.

Gudex C. Time trade-off user manual: props and self-completion method. In: Occasional Paper Series. York (UK): Centre for Health Economics, University of York; 1994.

Robinson A. , Dolan P. , Williams A.

Valuing health status using VAS and TTO: what lies behind the numbers?

Soc Sci Med. 1997; 45(8):1289-97.

Broome J. QALYs. J Public Econ. 1993;50(2):149-67.

10.

Patrick DL , Starks HE , Cain KC , Uhlmann RF , Pearlman RA Measuring preferences for health states worse than death. Med Decis Making. 1994;14(1):9-18.

11.

Lamers LM The transformation of utilities for health states worse than death: consequences for the estimation of EQ-5D value sets. Med Care . 2007;45(3):238-44.

12.

Richardson J. , Hawthorne G. Negative Utility Scores and Evaluating the AQoL All Worst Health State. Monash Working Paper 113; 2001.

13.

Stalmeier PF , Busschbach JJ , Lamers LM , Krabbe PF The gap effect: discontinuities of preferences around dead. Health Econ. 2005;14(7):679-85.

14.

Arnesen T. , Trommald M. Roughly right or precisely wrong? Systematic review of quality of life weights elicited with the time trade-off method. J Health Serv Res Pol. 2004;9(1):43-50.

15.

Arnesen T. , Trommald M. Are QALYs based on time trade-off comparable? A systematic review of TTO methodologies . Health Econ. 2005;14(1):39-53.

16.

Torrance GW Utility measurement in health care: the things I never got to. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(11):1069-78.

17.

Rittenhouse BE Healthy years equivalents versus time trade-off: ambiguity on certainty and uncertainty. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13(1):35-48.

18.

Hawthorne G. , Osborne RH , Elliott P. Commentary on: a psychometric analysis of the measurement level of the rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble, by Cook et al. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(4):895-7.

19.

Tilling C. , Devlin N. , Tsuchiya A. , Buckingham K. Protocols for TTO valuations of health states worse than dead: a literature review and framework for systematic analysis. Health Economics and Decision Science Discussion Paper Series, 08/09, University of Sheffield.

20.

Robinson A. , Spencer A. Exploring challenges to TTO utilities: valuing states worse than dead. Health Econ. 2006;15: 393-402.

21.

Detsky AS , McLaughlin JR , Abrams HB , et al. Quality of life of patients on long-term total parenteral nutrition at home. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1(1):26-33.

22.

Konig HH , Roick C. , Angermeyer MC Validity of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with schizophrenic, schizotypal or delusional disorders. Eur Psychiatr . 2007; 22(3):177-87.

23.

Dolan P. , Gudex C. , Kind P. , Williams A. Valuing health states: a comparison of methods. J Health Econ . 1996;15(2):209-31.

24.

Richardson J. , Day N. , Peacock S. , Iezzi A. Measurement of quality of life for economic evaluation and the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Mark II instrument . Aust Econ Rev. 2004; 37:62-88.

25.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal . London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2008.

26.

Stalmeier PFM , Goldstein MK , Hokmes AM , et al. What should be reported in a methods section on utility assessment? Med Decis Making. 2007;21(3):200-7.

27.

Stalmeier PFM , Lamers LM , Busschbach JJ , Krabbe P. On the assessment of Preferences for health and duration: maximal endurable time and better than dead preferences. Med Care. 2007; 45(9):835-41.

28.

Buckingham K. , Devlin N. A theoretical framework for TTO valuations of health. Health Econ. 2006;15(10):1149-54.

29.

Vershchurren M. Quality Adjusted Life Years and Time Trade Off Exercises: Exploring Methodology and Validity. PhD thesis, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2006.

Protocols for Time Tradeoff Valuations of Health States Worse than Dead: A Literature Review

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References