Patterns of Use of Handheld Clinical Decision Support Tools in the Clinical Setting

Abstract

Objectives. To assess the patterns of use of handheld clinical decision support tools by internal medicine residents in clinical settings. Methods. Eighty-two internal medicine residents were given personal digital assistants (PDAs) containing a suite of clinical decision support (CDS) programs. A tracking program was used to prospectively track program use during the study period, and a follow-up survey regarding self-reported program use was administered after the study period. Patterns of program use from the tracking data were compared to the data from the self-report survey. Results. Sixty-eight residents were followed using the tracking data. Residents used an average of 1.81 CDS programs (SD: 1.57; range, 0—5) per month. Forty-nine residents completed the self-report survey. Residents reported using an average of 3.15 (SD: 1.61) and 3.92 (SD: 1.40) CDS programs during a typical clinic session and inpatient day, respectively. In both inpatient and outpatient settings and for both methods of assessing program use, 2 programs (Epocrates and MedCalc) were used more often than the other programs. No association was observed between age, gender, race, and PGY level with the use of handheld clinical decision support tools for either tracked or self-report data. The self-report data show higher estimates of CDS program use than the tracking data in the clinical setting. Conclusions. The data show that physicians prefer to use certain handheld CDS tools in clinical settings. Drug references and medical calculators have been consistently used more than clinical prediction rules and diagnostic systems. Self-report survey instruments may overestimate recorded use of CDS programs.

Keywords

decision support systems clinical computers handheld decision making computer assisted internal medicine.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fischer S. , Stewart TE , Mehta S. , Wax R. , Lapinsky SE Handheld computing in medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc . 2003;10: 139—49.

Keplar KE , Urbanski CJ Personal digital assistant applications for the healthcare provider . Ann Pharmacother. 2003;37: 287—96.

Robinson RL , Burk MS Identification of drug-drug interactions with personal digital assistant-based software. Am J Med. 2004; 116:357—8.

Raman B. , Raman R. , Raman L. , Beaulieu CF Radiology on handheld devices: image display, manipulation, and PACS integration issues. Radiographics. 2004;24:299—310.

Luo J. Portable computing in psychiatry. Can J Psychiatry . 2004;49:24—30.

Magos A. , Sharma M. , Buck L. Handheld computers in clinical practice: are useful in informing and educating patients. BMJ. 2004;328:1565.

Joy S. , Benrubi G. Personal digital assistant use in Florida obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. South Med J. 2004;97: 430—3.

Laskin RS , Davis JP The use of a personal digital assistant in orthopaedic surgical practice . Clin Orthop. 2004;421:91—8.

Carroll AE , Christakis DA Pediatricians' use of and attitudes about personal digital assistants . Pediatrics. 2004;113:238—42.

10.

VanDenKerkhof EG , Goldstein DH , Lane J. , Rimmer MJ , Van Dijk JP Using a personal digital assistant enhances gathering of patient data on an acute pain management service: a pilot study . Can J Anaesth. 2003 ;50:368—75.

11.

Torre DM , Wright SM Clinical and educational uses of handheld computers. South Med J. 2003;96:996—9.

12.

Smith-Stoner M. 10 uses for personal digital assistants in home care. Home Healthcare Nurse. 2003;21:797—800.

13.

ACP-ASIM survey finds nearly half of US members use handheld computers. 2001. Available at: http://www.acponline.org/college/pressroom/handheld_survey.htm. Accessed 19 April 2005.

14.

Criswell DF , Parchman ML Handheld computer use in U.S. family practice residency programs. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9:80—6.

15.

Chin T. Untapped power: a physician's handheld. Am Med News . 2005;48:25—6.

16.

Ruland CM Handheld technology to improve patient care: evaluating a support system for preference-based care planning at the bedside. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9:192—201.

17.

Grasso BC , Genest R. , Yung K. , Arnold C. Reducing errors in discharge medication lists by using personal digital assistants . Psychiatr Serv. 2002;53:1325—6.

18.

PDAs help nurses improve care and save time. Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv. 2002;9:44—6.

19.

McLeod TG , Ebbert JO , Lymp JF Survey assessment of personal digital assistant use among trainees and attending physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:605—7.

20.

Rothschild JM , Lee TH , Bae T. , Bates DW Clinician use of a palmtop drug reference guide. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9: 223—9.

21.

Clauson KA , Seamon MJ , Clauson AS , Van TB Evaluation of drug information databases for personal digital assistants . Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004;61:1015—24.

22.

Reisman Y. Computer-based clinical decision aids: a review of methods and assessment of systems. Med Inform (London). 1996;21:179—97.

23.

Engle RL Jr. Attempts to use computers as diagnostic aids in medical decision making: a thirty-year experience. Perspect Biol Med. 1992;35:207—19.

24.

Garg AX , Adhikari NK , McDonald H. , et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005; 293:1223—38.

25.

Elstein AS Heuristics and biases: selected errors in clinical reasoning. Acad Med. 1999;74:791—4.

26.

Andre M. , Borgquist L. , Foldevi M. , Molstad S. Asking for ``rules of thumb'': a way to discover tacit knowledge in general practice. Fam Pract. 2002;19:617—22.

27.

Friedman CP , Gatti GG , Franz TM , et al. Do physicians know when their diagnoses are correct? Implications for decision support and error reduction. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:334—9.

28.

Lu YC , Lee JK , Xiao Y. , Sears A. , Jacko JA , Charters K.

Why don't physicians use their personal digital assistants?

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:405—9.

29.

Barrett JR , Strayer SM , Schubart JR Assessing medical residents' usage and perceived needs for personal digital assistants. Int J Med Inform. 2004 ;73:25—34.

30.

Homan MM , Armstrong TJ Evaluation of three methodologies for assessing work activity during computer use. AIHA J (Fairfax, VA). 2003;64:48—55.

31.

Greenberg R. Use of the personal digital assistant (PDA) in medical education. Med Educ. 2004;38:570—1.

32.

Miller J. , Shaw-Kokot JR , Arnold MS , et al. A study of personal digital assistants to enhance undergraduate clinical nursing education. J Nurs Educ. 2005 ;44:19—26.

33.

Lapinsky SE , Wax R. , Showalter R. , et al. Prospective evaluation of an Internet-linked handheld computer critical care knowledge access system. Crit Care. 2004;8:R414—21.

34.

Brown SH , Coney RD Changes in physicians' computer anxiety and attitudes related to clinical information system use. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994;1:381—94.

35.

Cork RD , Detmer WM , Friedman CP Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure physicians' use of, knowledge about, and attitudes toward computers. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5:164—76.

36.

Lu YC , Xiao Y. , Sears A. , Jacko JA A review and a framework of handheld computer adoption in healthcare . Int J Med Inform. 2005;74:409—22.

37.

Gillingham W. , Holt A. , Gillies J.

Hand-held computers in healthcare: what software programs are available?

N Z Med J. 2002;115:U185.

38.

McAlearney AS , Schweikhart SB , Medow MA Doctors' experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study. BMJ. 2004;328:1162.

39.

McAlearney AS , Schweikhart SB , Medow MA Organizational and physician perspectives about facilitating handheld computer use in clinical practice: results of a cross-site qualitative study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12:568—75.

40.

Rosenbloom MJW , Adams J. Patient care efficiency and medical error reduction using PDA-based medical information. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:587—8.