Fryback DG.A US valuation of the EQ-5D. Med Care. 2005;43:199-200.
2.
Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ.US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care. 2005;43:203-220.
3.
Gold MR, Patrick DL, Torrance GW, et al.Identifying and valuing outcomes. In: Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC, eds. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. p 82-134.
4.
The EuroQoL Group. EuroQoL—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16: 199-208.
5.
Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, et al.Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index Mark 3 system. Med Care. 2002;40:113-128.
6.
Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M.The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21:271-292.
7.
Tsuchiya A, Brazier J, Roberts J.Comparison of valuation methods used to generate the EQ-5D and the SF-6D value sets. J Health Econ. 2006;25:334-346.
8.
Connor-Spady B, Suarez-Almazor ME.Variation in the estimation of quality-adjusted life-years by different preference-based instruments. Med Care. 2003;41:791-801.
9.
Oostenbrink R, Moll HA, Essink-Bot ML.The EQ-5D and the Health Utilities Index for permanent sequelae after meningitis: a head-to-head comparison. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:791-799.
10.
Marra CA, Woolcott JC, Kopec JA, et al.A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1571-1582.
11.
O’Brien BJ, Spath M, Blackhouse G, Severens JL, Dorian P, Brazier J.A view from the bridge: agreement between the SF-6D utility algorithm and the Health Utilities Index. Health Econ. 2003;12:975-981.
12.
McDonough CM, Grove MR, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Hilibrand AS, Tosteson ANA. Comparison of EQ-5D, HUI, and SF-36-derived societal health state values among spine patient outcomes research trial (SPORT) participants. Qual Life Res. 2005;14: 1321-1332.
13.
Winkelmayer WC, Benner JS, Glynn RJ, et al.Assessing health state utilities in elderly patients at cardiovascular risk. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:247-254.
14.
Avorn J, Benner J, Ford I, et al.Measuring the cost-effectiveness of lipid-lowering drugs in the elderly: the outcomes research and economic analysis components of the PROSPER trial. Control Clin Trials2002;23:757-773.
15.
Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, Torrance GW.Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995;7:490-502.
16.
Revicki DA, Leidy NK, Brennan-Diemer F, Sorensen S, Togias A.Integrating patient preferences into health outcomes assessment: the multiattribute Asthma Symptom Utility Index. Chest. 1999;114:998-1007.