Hersh WR, Greenes RA. Information retrieval in medicine: state of the art. MD Comput. 1990;7:302-311.
2.
Marshall JG. Characteristics of early adopters of end-user online searching in the health professions. Bull Med Library Assoc. 1989;77:48-55.
3.
Fox S, Fallows D. Internet health resources: health searches and e-mail have become more commonplace, but there is room for improvement in searches and overall Internet access. Washington (DC): Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2003. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Health_Report_July_2003.pdf
4.
Gorman PN, Helfand M. Information seeking in primary care: how physicians choose which clinical questions to pursue and which to leave unanswered. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:113-119.
5.
Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, et al.Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care. Br Med J. 1999;319:358-361.
6.
Hersh WR, Crabtree MK, Hickam DH, et al.Factors associated with success for searching MEDLINE and applying evidence to answer clinical questions. J Am Med Informat Assoc. 2002;9:283-293.
7.
Haynes RB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ, et al.More informative abstracts revisited. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:69-76.
8.
Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, et al.A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and recommendations of clinical experts: treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1992;268:240-248.
9.
Hersh WR, Hickam DH. How well do physicians use electronic information retrieval systems? A framework for investigation and review of the literature. JAMA. 1998;280:1347-1352.
10.
Westbrook JI, Gosling AS, Coiera EW. The impact of an online evidence system on confidence in decision making in a controlled setting. Med Decis Making. 2005;25(2):178-185.
