Schwarz N. Accessible content and accessibility experiences: the interplay of declarative and experimental information in judgment. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1998;2:87-99.
4.
Schwarz N. Meta-cognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. J Consumer Psychol. 2004;14:332-348.
5.
Tversky A, Kahneman D. Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognit Psychol. 1973;5:207-232.
6.
Rothman AJ, Schwarz N. Constructing perceptions of vulnerability: personal relevance and the use of experimental information in health judgments. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1998;24:1053-1064.
7.
Schwarz N, Bless H, Strack F, Klump G, Rittenauer-Schatka H, Simons A. Ease of retrieval as information: another look at the availability heuristic. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;61:195-202.
8.
Fischhoff B. Hindsight does not equal foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1975;1:288-299.
9.
Hawkins SA, Hastie R. Hindsight: biased judgment of past events after the outcomes are known. Psychol Bull. 1990;107:311-327.
10.
Sanna LJ, Schwarz N, Stocker SL. When debiasing backfires: accessible content and accessibility experiences in debiasing hindsight. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002;28:497-502.
11.
Sanna LJ, Schwarz N. Debiasing hindsight: the role of accessibility experiences and attributions. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2003;39:287-295.
12.
Sanna LJ, Schwarz N, Small EM. Accessibility experiences and the hindsight bias: I knew it all along versus it could never have happened. Mem Cognit. 2002;30:1288-1296.
13.
Stepper S, Strack F. Proprioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;64:211-220.
14.
Sanna LJ, Schwarz N. Integrating temporal biases: the interplay of focal thoughts and accessibility experiences. Psychol Sci. 2004;17:474-481.
15.
Novemsky N, Dhar R, Schwarz N, Simonson I.The effect of preference fluency on consumer decision making. Unpublished manuscript; 2004.
16.
Reber R, Schwarz N, Winkielman P. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience?Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8:364-382.
17.
Winkielman P, Schwarz N, Fazendeiro T, Reber R.The hedonic marking of processing fluency: implications for evaluative judgment. In: Musch J, Klauer KC, eds. The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 2003. p 189-217.
18.
Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relations. 1954;7:117-140.
19.
Begg IM, Anas A, Farinacci S. Dissociation of processes in belief: source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992;121:446-458.
20.
Hasher L, Goldstein D, Toppino T. Frequency and the conference of referential validity. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav. 1977;16:107-112.
21.
Allport FH, Lepkin M. Wartime rumors of waste and special privilege: why some people believe them. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1945;40:3-36.
22.
Reber R, Schwarz N. Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Conscious Cogn. 1999;8:338-342.
23.
McGlone MS, Tofighbakhsh J. Birds of a feather flock conjointly(?): rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychol Sci. 2000;11:424-428.
24.
Park DC. The basic mechanisms accounting for age-related decline in cognitive function. In: Park DC, Schwarz N, eds. Cognitive Aging: A Primer. Philadelphia (PA): Psychology Press; 2000.
25.
Skurnik I, Yoon C, Park DC, Schwarz N. How warnings become recommendations: paradoxical effects of warnings on beliefs of older consumers. J Consumer Res. 2005; in press.
26.
Schwarz N, Clore GL. Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In: Higgins ET, Kruglanski AW, eds. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. New York: Guilford; 1996.
27.
Wänke M, Bless H, Biller B. Subjective experience versus content of information in the construction of attitude judgments. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1996;22:1105-1113.
28.
McGlone MS, Tofighbakhsh J. The Keats heuristic: rhyme as reason in aphorism interpretation. Poetics. 1999;26:235-244.
