A research report in the present issue of Medical Decision Making raises questions about the definition of heuristic strategies, the validity of conclusions drawn from the analysis of verbal protocols, and the tradeoff between rigor and relevance in research on the psychology of patient decision making.
1. Volk RJ, Cantor SB, Spann SJ, Cass AR, Cardenas MP, Warren MM. Preferences of husbands and wives for prostate cancer screening. Arch Fam Med.1997;6:72-76.
2.
2. Chodak GW, Thisted RA, Gerber GS, et al.Results of conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med.1994;330:242-248.
3.
3. Middleton RG, Thompson IM, Austenfeld MS, et al.Prostate cancer clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol.1995;154:2144-2148.
4.
4. Steginga SK, Occhipinti S. The application of the heuristic-systematic processing model to treatment decision making about prostate cancer. Med Decis Making. 2004;24:in this issue.
5.
5. Chaiken S, Liberman A, Eagly AH. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In: Uleman JS, Bargh JA, eds. Unintended Thought. New York: Guilford; 1989. p 212-252.
6.
6. Polya G. How to Solve It. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1957.
7.
7. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211:453-458.
8.
8. Simon HA. A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Econ.1955;69:99-118.
9.
9. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, eds. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
10.
10. Hogarth RM. Judgement and Choice: The Psychology of Decision. New York: John Wiley; 1980.
11.
11. Detmer DE, Fryback DG, Gassner K. Heuristics and biases in medical decision-making. J Med Educ.1978;53:682-683.
12.
12. Dawson NV, Arkes HR. Systematic errors in medical decision making: judgment limitations. J Gen Intern Med.1987;2:183-187.
13.
13. Chapman GB, Elstein AS. Cognitive processes and biases in medical decision making. In: Chapman GB, Sonnenberg FA, eds. Decision Making in Health Care: Theory, Psychology, and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000. p 183-210.
14.
14. Redelmeier DA, Rozin P, Kahneman D. Understanding patients’ decisions: cognitive and emotional perspectives. JAMA. 1993;270:72-76.
15.
15. Heller RF, Saltzstein HD, Caspe WB. Heuristics in medical and non-medical decision-making. Q J Exp Psychol A.1992;44:211-235.
16.
16. Edgell SE, Harbison JI, Neace WP, Nahinsky ID, Lajoie AS. What is learned from experience in a probabilities environment?J Behav Decis Making. 2004;17:213-229.
17.
17. Christensen C, Heckerling P, Mackesy-Amiti ME, Bernstein LM, Elstein AS. Pervasiveness of framing effects among physicians and medical students. J Behav Decis Making. 1995;8:169-180.
18.
18. Bergus GR, Chapman GB, Gjerde C, Elstein AS. Clinical reasoning about new symptoms despite preexisting disease: sources of error and order effects. Fam Med.1995;27:314-320.
19.
19. Poses RM, Anthony M. Availability, wishful thinking, and physicians’ diagnostic judgments for patients with suspected bacteremia. Med Decis Making. 1991;11:159-168.
20.
20. Poses RM, Bekes C, Copare FJ, Scott WE. What difference do two days make? The inertia of physicians’ sequential prognostic judgments for critically ill patients. Med Decis Making. 1990;10:6-14.
21.
21. McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Sox HC Jr, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med.1982;306:1259-1262.
22.
22. Redelmeier DA, Tversky A. Discrepancy between medical decisions for individual patients and for groups. N Engl J Med.1990;322:1162-1164.
23.
23. Redelmeier DA, Kahneman D. Patients’ memories of painful medical treatments: real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain. 1996;66:3-8.
24.
24. Siminoff LA, Fetting JH. Effects of outcome framing on treatment decisions in the real world: impact of framing on adjuvant breast cancer decisions. Med Decis Making. 1989;9:262-271.
25.
25. Connolly T, Ordonez L. Judgment and decision making. In: Borman WC, ed. Handbook of Psychology. Vol. 12, Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York: John Wiley; 2003. p 493-518.
26.
26. Hastie R. Social inference. Annu Rev Psychol.1983;34:511-542.
27.
27. Arkes HR. Costs and benefits of judgment errors: implications for debiasing. Psychol Bull.1991;110:486-498.
28.
28. Hamm RM, Scheid DC, Smith WR, Tape TG. Opportunities for applying psychological theory to improve medical decision making: two case histories. In: Chapman GB, Sonnenberg FA, eds. Decision Making in Health Care: Theory, Psychology, and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000. p 386-421.
29.
29. Poses RM, Cebul RD, Wigton RS. You can lead a horse to water: improving physicians’ knowledge of probabilities may not affect their decisions. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:65-75.
30.
30. Christensen-Szalanski JJ, Diehr PH, Bushyhead JB, Wood RW. Two studies of good clinical judgment. Med Decis Making. 1982;2:275-283.
31.
31. Hammond KR. How convergence of research paradigms can improve research on diagnostic judgment. Med Decis Making. 1996;16:281-287.
32.
32. Gigerenzer G. Striking a blow for sanity in theories of rationality. In:Augier M, March JG, eds. Models of a Man: Essays in Memory of Herbert A. Simon. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2004. p 389-409.
33.
33. Gigerenzer G. The psychology of good judgment: frequency formats and simple algorithms. Med Decis Making. 1996;16:273-280.
34.
34. Anderson JR. Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1993.
35.
35. Abernathy CM, Hamm RM. Surgical Intuition. Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus; 1995.
36.
36. Hamm RM. Medical decision scripts: combining cognitive scripts and judgment strategies to account fully for medical decision making. In: Hardman D, Macchi L, eds. Thinking: Psychological Perspectives on Reasoning, Judgment and Decision Making. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2003. p 315-345.
37.
37. Patel VL, Arocha JF, Kaufman DR. Medical cognition. In: Durso FT, ed. Handbook of Applied Cognition. Chichester (UK): John Wiley and Sons; 1999. p 663-693.
38.
38. Harries C, Forrest D, Bowling A, Harvey N, Hemmingway H. The role of physician decision making in age-related inequalities in health care [Abstract]. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:577.
39.
39. Kleinmuntz DN, Thomas JB. The value of action and inference in dynamic decision making. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1987;39:341-364.
40.
40. Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EG. The Adaptive Decision Maker. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
41.
41. Dougherty MRP, Gettys CF, Ogden EE. MINERVA DM: a memory processes model for judgments of likelihood. Psychol Rev.1999;106:180-209.
42.
42. Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol.1980;39:752-766.
43.
43. Chaiken S, Giner-Sorolla R, Chen S. Beyond accuracy: defense and impression motives in heuristic and systematic information processing. In: Golwitzer PM, Bargh JA, eds. The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior. New York: Guilford; 1996. p 553-578.
44.
44. Hershberger PJ, Part HM, Markert RJ, Cohen SM, Finger WW. Development of a test of cognitive bias in medical decision making. Acad Med.1994;69:839-842.
45.
45. Stanovich KE, West RF. Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?Behav Brain Sci.2000;23:645-726.
46.
46. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185:1124-1131.
47.
47. Taylor SE. The availability bias in social perception and interaction. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, eds. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1982. p 190-200.
48.
48. Dhami MK, Ayton P. Bailing and jailing the fast and frugal way. J Behav Decis Making. 2001;14:141-168.
49.
49. Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1984.
50.
50. Hamm RM. Moment by moment variation in experts’ analytic and intuitive cognitive activity. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern.1988;18:757-776.
