Heterogeneity Bias: The Difference between Adjusted and Unadjusted Effects

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Kuntz KM, Goldie SJ. Assessing the sensitivity of decisionanalytic results to unobserved markers of risk: defining the effects of heterogeneity bias. Med Decis Making. 2002;22:218–227.

2. GailM, Wieand S, Piantadosi S. Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomised experiments with non linear regressions and omitted covariates. Biometrika. 1984;71:431–444.

3. Robinson LD, Jewell NP. Some surprising results about covariate adjustment in logistic regression models. Int Statist Rev. 1991;58:227–240.

4. Ford I, Norrie J, Ahmadi S. Model inconsistency, illustrated by the Cox proportional hazards model. Stat Med. 1995;14:735–746.

5. Schmoor C, Schumacher M. Effects of covariate omission and categorization when analysing randomized trials with the Cox model. Stat Med. 1997;16:225–237.

6. SteyerbergEW, BossuytPM, Lee KL. Clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction: should we adjust for baseline characteristics? Am Heart J. 2000;139:745–751.