Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Self-reported health status is often measured using utility indices that provide a score intended to summarize an individual’s health. Measurements of health status can be subject to a ceiling effect. Frequently, researchers want to examine relationships between determinants of health and measures of health status. In this article, Bayesian extensions of the classical Tobit model are used to study the relationship between health status and predictors of health. The author examined models where the conditional distribution of health status was either normal or lognormal, and allowed for both homoscedasticity and heteroscedasticity. Bayes factors were then used to compare the evidence for a given model against that for a competing model. The author found very strong evidence that the distribution of the Health Utilities Index, conditional on age, gender, income adequacy, and number of chronic conditions, was normal with nonuniform variance, compared to the competing models.

Keywords

Tobit model Health Utilities Index health status ceiling effect Bayesian statistics Bayes factors

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Stewart AL , Hays RD , Ware JE . Methods of constructing health measures. In: Stewart AL , Ware JE , eds. Measuring Function and Well-Being. The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992. p. 67-85.

Froberg DG , Kane RL . Methodology for measuring health-state preferences—I: Measurement strategies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42: 345-354.

Feeny DH , Torrance GW , Furlong WJ . Health Utilities Index. In: Spilker B , ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996. p. 239-252.

Austin PC , Kopec JA , Escobar M. The use of the Tobit model for measures of health status. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:901-910.

Maddala GS . Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

Austin PC . Robust Methods for Analyzing Measures of Health Status. Value in Health. 2002; (in press).

Chib S. Bayes inference in the Tobit censored regression model. J Econometrics. 1992;51:79-99.

Hamilton BH . HMO selection and medicare costs: Bayesian MCMC estimation of a robust panel data Tobit model with survival. Health Econ. 1999;8:403-414.

Cowles MK , Carlin BP , Connet JE . Bayesian Tobit modeling of longitudinal ordinal clinical trial compliance data with nonignorable missingness. J Am Stat Assoc. 1996;91:86-98.

10.

Li K. Bayesian Inference in a simultaneous equation model with limited dependent variables. J Econometrics. 1998;85:387-400.

11.

Wei SX . A Bayesian approach to dynamic Tobit models. Econometric Rev. 1999;18:417-439.

12.

Statistics Canada . NPHS Public Use Microdata Documentation. Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada, 1995.

13.

Torrance GW , Feeny DH , Furlong WJ , et al. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med Care. 1996;34:702-722.

14.

The Ontario Health Survey . 1990. User Guide Volume 1 Documentation. Ottawa, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Health, 1991.

15.

Statistics Canada . General Social Survey (91); Public Use Microdata File Documentation and User’s Guide. Ottawa, Ontario: Ministry of Industry, Science and Technology, 1992.

16.

Tobin J. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica. 1958;26:24-36.

17.

Lee PM . Bayesian Statistics, an Introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Arnold, 1989.

18.

Gelman A , Carlin JB , Stern HS , Rubin DB . Bayesian Data Analysis. London: Chapman & Hall, 1995.

19.

Gilks WR , Richardson S , Spiegelhalter DJ . Introducing Markov chain Monte Carlo. In: Gilks WR , Richardson S , Spiegelhalter DJ , eds. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. London: Chapman & Hall, 1996. p. 1-19.

20.

Spiegelhalter DJ , Thomas A , Best NG , Gilks W. BUGS: Bayesian Inference Using Gibbs Sampling, Version 0.603. Cambridge, UK: Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, 1995.

21.

Geweke J. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to calculating posterior moments. In: Bernardo JM , Berger JO , Dawid AP , Smith AFM , eds. Bayesian Statistics 4. Oxford, UK: Clarendon, 1994. p. 169-193.

22.

Kopec JA , Williams JI , To T , Austin PC . Measuring population health: correlates of the Health Utilities Index among English and French Canadians. Can J Public Health. 2000;91:465-470.

23.

Raftery AE . Hypothesis testing and model selection. In: Gilks WR , Richardson S , Spiegelhalter DJ , eds. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. London: Chapman & Hall, 1996. p. 163-187.

24.

MathSoft Inc. S-Plus 5.1. Cambridge, MA: MathSoft, 1999.

25.

Lang JM , Rothman KJ , Cann CI . That confounded P-value. Epidemiology. 1998;9:7-8.

26.

Kass RE , Raftery AE . Bayes factors. J Am Stat Assoc. 1995;90:773-795.

Bayesian Extensions of the Tobit Model for Analyzing Measures of Health Status

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References