A decision aid for the surgical treatment of early breast cancer was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. The decision aid, a tape and workbook, includes explicit presentation of probabilities, photographs and graphics, and a values clarification exercise. Community surgeons were randomized to use the decision aid or a control pamphlet. Patients completed a questionnaire prior to using the decision aid, after reviewing it but prior to surgery, and 6 months after enrollment. There was no difference in anxiety, knowledge, or decisional regret across the 2 groups. There was a nonsignificant trend toward lower decisional conflict in the decision aid group. A subgroup of women who were initially leaning toward mastectomy or were unsure had lower decisional conflict. Although the decision aid had minimal impact on the main study outcomes, a subgroup may have benefited. Such subgroups should be identified, and appropriate decision support interventions should be developed and evaluated.
Veronesi A, Saccozzi R, DelVecchio M, et al.Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:6-11.
2.
Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al.Five year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:665-673.
3.
Fisher B, Redmond R, Poisson R, et al.Eight year results with a clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:822-828.
4.
Blichert-Toft M, Rose C, Anderson JA, Overgaard M, Axelsson CK, Andersen KW, Mouridsen HT. Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1992;11:19-25.
5.
van Dongen J, Bartelink H, Fentiman J, et al.Factors influencing local relapse and survival and results of salvage treatment after breast-conserving therapy in operable breast cancer: EORTC trial 1808, breast conservation compared with mastectomy in TNM Stage I and II breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1992;28A:801-805.
6.
Jacobsen JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, et al.Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of Stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:909-911.
7.
Mirsky D, O’Brien SE, McCready DR, et al.Surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer (stage I and II). Cancer Prev Control. 1997;1:10-17.
8.
O’Connor A, Tugwell P, Wells G, et al.Randomized trial of a portable, self-administered decision aid for post-menopausal women considering long-term preventive hormone therapy. Med Decis Making. 1998;18:295-303.
9.
Kroll JC, Rothert ML, Rourer D, et al.Decision support interventions: more is not necessarily better. Med Decis Making. 1994;14:440 (abstract).
10.
Llewellyn-Thomas HA, McGreal MJ, Thiel EC. Patients’ willingness to enter clinical trials: measuring the association with perceived benefit and preference for decision participation. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32:34-42.
11.
Sawka CA, Goel V, Mahut CA, et al.Development of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer. Health Expect. 1998;1:22-36.
12.
Beaver K, Luker K.Readability of patient information booklets for women with breast cancer. Patient Ed Counsel. 1997;37:95-102.
13.
Carter WB, Beach LR, Inui TS. The flu shot: using multiattribute utility theory to design a vaccination intervention. Org Behav Hum Decis Proc. 1986;38:378-391.
Ward S, Griffin J.Developing a test of knowledge of surgical options for breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 1990;13:191-196.
16.
O’Connor A.Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:25-30.
17.
Kerry SM, Bland JM. The intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomisation. BMJ. 1998;316:1455-1460.
18.
Donner A.Some aspects of the design and analysis of cluster randomization trials. Appl Statist. 1998;47:95-113.
19.
Morris J, Royle GT. Offering patients a choice of surgery for early breast cancer: a reduction in anxiety and depression in patients and their husbands. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26:584-585.
20.
Street RL, Voight B.Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life. Med Decis Making. 1997;17:298-306.
21.
Roberts CS, Cox CE, Preintgen DS, Baile WF, Gibertine M.Influence of physician communication on newly diagnosed breast patients’ psychologic adjustment and decision-making. Cancer. 1994;74:336-341.
22.
Report on the National Forum on Breast Cancer, Minister of Supply and Services Canada, p 24, 1994.
23.
Ward S, Heidrich S, Wolberg W.Factors women take into account when deciding upon type of surgery for breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 1989;12:344-351.
24.
Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, et al.Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA. 1997;277:1485-1492.
25.
Whelan T, Levine M, Gafni A, et al.Mastectomy or lumpectomy? Helping women make informed choices. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1727-1735.
26.
Coulter A.Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. J Health Serv Res Pol. 1997;2:112-121.
27.
Fallowfield L.Offering choice of surgical treatment to women with breast cancer. Patient Ed Counsel. 1997;30:209-314.
28.
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T.Shared decision making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681-692.
