The authors provide a simple calculation for the unbiased estimation of the area under the ROC curve for a binary diagnostic test or a continuously valued test result that is effectively used in a binary way. The formula described can be used to interpret the discriminative ability of a diagnostic test. Key words: ROC curve analysis, binary diagnostic test; discriminative ability. (Med Decis Making 2000;20:468-470)
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Metz CEBasic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med.1978;8:283-98.
2.
Cantor SB, Sun CC, Tortolero-Luna G., Richards-Kortum R., Follen M.A comparison of C/B ratios from studies using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:885-92.
3.
Hilden J., Glasziou P.Regret graphs, diagnostic uncertainty and Youden's index. Stat Med. 1996;15:969-86.
4.
Slawin KM, Kattan MW, Scher HI, Scardino PTProstate-specific antigen in screening, prognosis of the primary tumor and monitoring of recurrent disease. In: Perry MC (ed). 2000Spring Educational Book . Alexandria, VA: American Society of Clinical Oncology , 2000:596-608.
5.
Obuchowski NASample size calculations in studies of test accuracy. Stat Meth Med Res. 1998;7:371-92.
6.
Dorfman DD, Alf E.Jr.Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—rating—method data. J Math Psychol.1969; 6:487-96.
7.
Hanley JA, McNeil BJThe meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve. Radiology1982,143: 29-36.
8.
Weinstein MC , Fineberg HVClinical Decision Analysis. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders, 1980.
9.
Biggerstaff BJComparing diagnostic tests: a simple graphic using likelihood ratios. Stat Med. 2000;19:649-63.
