The private sector is playing an increasingly important role in family planning services globally. The active participation of private providers is associated with a higher contraceptive prevalence rate.
Objectives
To examine the differentials and determinants of the utilization of private providers for family planning services.
Method
This study used the 2014 Malaysian Population and Family Survey data. Cross-tabulations and logistic regression were performed on 1,817 current users of modern methods.
Results
Overall, 26% of modern method users obtained their supplies from private clinics/pharmacies and 15.2% from other sources, such as drug stores and sundry shops. The odds of utilizing the private sector for family planning services differ significantly across regions and socio-economic groups. The odds of obtaining supply from the private clinics/pharmacies were higher among the Chinese and urban women (AOR > 1), and it was lower among those from the eastern region (AOR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.30–0.73). Non-Bumiputera, urban, higher educated, and working women, and those whose husbands decided on family planning had higher odds of obtaining the supply from the other sources (AOR > 1).
Conclusion
The private sector complements and supplements the public sector in providing family planning services to the public.
BongaartsJClelandJTownsendJW, et al. Family planning programs for the 21st century: rationale and design: The Population Council; 2012.
2.
SonfieldAHasstedtKKavanaughML, et al. The social and economic benefits of women’s ability to determine whether and when to have children. New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2013.
3.
RanaMJGoliS.Tracing long-term trajectories of contraceptive practice across 185 countries. PLoS One2018;
13: e0205927.
4.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World contraceptive use 2020. San Francisco: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2020.
5.
United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. San Francisco: United Nations, 2015.
6.
HamidSStephensonR.Provider and health facility influences on contraceptive adoption in urban Pakistan. Int Family Plann Perspect2006;
32: 71–78.
7.
WinfreyWHeatonLFoxT, et al. Factors influencing the growth of the commercial sector in family planning service provision, Washington, DC: The POLICY Project; 2000.
8.
ShahNMWangWBishaiDM.Comparing private sector family planning services to government and NGO services in Ethiopia and Pakistan: how do social franchises compare across quality, equity and cost?Health Policy Plann2011;
26: i63–i71.
9.
RobinsonWCRossJA.The global family planning revolution: three decades of population policies and programs.
Washington:
World Bank, 2007.
10.
BermanPRoseL.The role of private providers in maternal and child health and family planning services in developing countries. Health Policy Plann1996;
11: 142–155.
11.
JainMLChauhanMTalwarB.Role of private sector in family planning programme in Rajasthan, India - a rapid assessment. Int J Community Med Public Health2016;
3: 869–874.
12.
MillsA.Improving the efficiency of public sector health services in developing countries: bureaucratic versus market approaches. In: CCoclough (ed) Marketizing education and health in developing countries: miracle or mirage?Oxford:
Clarendon Press, 1995. p. 245-306.
13.
World Bank. Worlddevelopment report 1993: investing in health. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
14.
World Health Organization. The world health report 2006: working together for health. Geneva: WHO, 2006.
15.
Ministry of Immigration and Population, Department of Population.Country report on 2007: fertility and reproductive health survey. Nay Pyi Taw: Ministry of Immigration and Population, Department of Population,2009
16.
National Population and Family Planning Board (BKKBN), Statistics Indonesia (BPS), Ministry of Health (Kemenkes), et al. Indonesia demographic and health survey 2017. Jakarta: BKKBN, BPS, Kemenkes, and ICF, 2018.
17.
CampbellOMRBenovaLMacleodD, et al.
Who, what, where: an analysis of private sector family planning provision in 57 low- and middle-income countries. Trop Med Int Health2015;
20: 1639–1656.
18.
ChakrabortyNMSprockettA.Use of family planning and child health services in the private sector: an equity analysis of 12 DHS surveys. Int J Equity Health2018;
17: 1–12.
19.
ForeitKGF.Source of maternal and child health care as an indicator of ability to pay for family planning. Int Family Plann Perspect2002b;
28: 167–169.
20.
GrépinKA.Private sector an important but not dominant provider of key health services in low- and middle-income countries. Health Aff2016;
35: 1214–1221.
21.
KhanAAKhanAJavedW, et al.
Family planning in Pakistan: applying what we have learned. J Pak Med Assoc2013;
63: S3–S10.
22.
MahmoodNRingheimK.Factors affecting contraceptive use in Pakistan.Pak Dev Rev1996;
35: 1–22.
23.
MuhozaDNRutayisirePCUmubyeyiA.Measuring the success of family planning initiatives in Rwanda: a multivariate decomposition analysis. J Popul Res2016;
33: 361–377.
24.
WeinbergerMCallahanS.The private sector: key to achieving family planning 2020 goals. Bethesda, Sustaining Health Outcomes through the Private Sector Project, Abt Associates, 2017.
25.
NairPSFeeneyGMishraVK, et al. Factors affecting source of family planning services in India. Mumbai, India and Honolulu, Hawaii, International Institute for Population Sciences and East-West Center, Population and Health Studies, 1999.
26.
SamuelsonPA.Consumption theory in terms of revealed preference. Economica1948;
15: 243–253.
27.
LandryDJWeiJFrostJJ.Public and private providers' involvement in improving their patients' contraceptive use. Contraception2008;
78: 42–51.
28.
United Nations Population Fund. Global survey ICPD beyond 2014 Malaysia country report. Kuala Lumpur: United Nations Population Fund,2012.
29.
World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific. Malaysia health system review.
Manila:
WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific, 2012.
30.
DOSM. Social statistics bulletin, Malaysia. Putrajaya: DOSM,2019.
31.
World Bank. World development indicators. Geneva: WHO, 2020.
32.
NPFDB. Report on key findings of the fifth Malaysian population and family survey (MPFS-5) 2014. Kuala Lumpur: NPFDB,2016.
33.
MakmorTKhaledTAhmad FaridO, et al.
Demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with access to public clinics. J Health Transl Med2018;
21: 28–33.
34.
ShiLChenC-CNieX, et al.
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in access to primary care among people with chronic conditions. J Am Board Family Med2014;
27: 189–198.
35.
HardeeKWoffordDThatteN.Partnering with the private sector to strengthen provision of contraception.
Geneva: WHO, 2017.
36.
LeoprapaiB.Role of private sector in family planning service delivery. Warasan Prachakon Lae Sangkhom1999;
7: 11–17.
37.
Pandit-RajaniTSharmaSMuramutsaF.Fostering public-private partnerships to improve access to family planning in Rwanda.
Washington, DC: Health Policy Initiative,2010.
38.
RileyCGarfinkelDThanelK, et al.
Getting to FP2020: harnessing the private sector to increase modern contraceptive access and choice in Ethiopia, Nigeria, and DRC.PLoS one2018;
13: e0192522.
39.
UgazJLeegwaterAChatterjiM, et al.
Impact of family planning and business trainings on private-sector health care providers in Nigeria. Int Perspect Sexual Reprod Health2017;
43: 51–65.
40.
van der VeldenTPingC.The introduction of Norplant in Cambodia through the private sector. Asia Pac J Public Health2002;
14: 69–74.
41.
JohnsonDUgazJ.Determinants of quality of family planning counseling among private health facilities in Lagos. Stud Family Plann2016;
47: 239–251.
42.
SharmaSGribbleJNMenottiEP.Creating options in family planning for the private sector in Latin America. Pan Am J Public Health2005;
18: 37–44.
43.
ApostolGBoxshallMSheahanK, et al. Leveraging private sector primary care providers to increase access to family planning in the Philippines.
Washington, DC: ThinkWell, 2019.
44.
KamranINiaziRParveenT, et al. Improving access to family planning services through the private sector in Pakistan: a stakeholder analysis. The Population Council: Islamabad, 2019.
45.
PrashanthNS.Public-private partnerships and health policies. Econ Polit Wkly2011;
46: 13–15.
46.
Sundari RavindranTK.Public-private partnerships in maternal health services. Econ Polit Wkly2011;
46: 43, 45–52.
47.
ForeitKGF.Broadening commercial sector participation in reproductive health: the role of public sector prices on markets for oral contraceptives.
Washington, DC: The Commercial Market Strategies project, 2002.
48.
SharmaSDayaratnaV.Creating conditions for greater private sector participation in achieving contraceptive security. Health Policy2005;
71: 347–357.
49.
LewisMAKenneyG.The private sector and family planning in developing countries: its role, achievements and potential, Washington, DC: World Bank, 1988.
50.
DrakeJKThanhLHTSuraratdechaC, et al.
Stakeholder perceptions of a total market approach to family planning in Viet Nam. Reprod Health Matters2010;
18: 46–55.
51.
RoyBGuptaS.Public-private partnership and user fees in healthcare: evidence from West Bengal. Econ Polit Wkly2011;
46: 74–78.
