This study aimed to evaluate the effects of verbal and written feedback in clinical midwifery placement on students’ self-assessed performance and their self-assessment ability. This three-group quasi-experimental study was conducted on 120 students. Participants in the control group received clinical education through the routine method, while in the feedback groups received either verbal or written feedback methods on the basis of the sandwich feedback model. In the last day of clinical education, a checklist was simultaneously filled out by participants and a second instructor. There was significant direct correlation between the scores of performance assessment by both the second instructor and students in the control group (r = .38, p = .01), the verbal feedback group (r = .63, p < .001), and the written feedback group (r = .74, p < .001). The rates of student–instructor agreement in the control, verbal feedback, and written feedback groups were 32.5%, 70%, and 77.5%, respectively. Feedback is effective in significantly improving students’ self-assessment ability.
DelaramMSafdari DahcheshmeFShB, et al. Midwifery students’ self-assessment of their ability in practical skills. Edu Strateg Med Sci2013;
6: 177–182. (in Persian)
2.
KhatibanMSangestaniGOshvandiK.Midwifery students’ experience of role-playing as a teaching strategy: a qualitative study. J Nurs Educ2014;
3: 61–70. (in Persian)
3.
AhmadiGShahriariMKeyvanaraM, et al.
Midwifery students’ experiences of learning clinical skills in Iran: a qualitative study. Int J Med Educ2018;
9: 64–71. (in Persian)
4.
SabetiFANassajiNHaghighizadeMH.Senior nursing students in their pursuit of self-evaluation of clinical skills Nursing - Surgical Medical Sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur in 88 years. Iran J Med Educ2012;
11: 506–515. (in Persian)
5.
MorshedyZMansouriyanNDehnoalianA.Evaluation of clinical competency of nursing students in Medical Sciences Faculty of Neyshabur. J Educ Ethics Nurs2016;
5: 45–53. (in Persian)
6.
Miller EJ and Seldin P. Changing practices in faculty evaluation: Can better evaluation make a difference? Journal of Academic 2014; 100: 35–8.
7.
AsghariNHosseiniSAbediniS, et al.
A comparison of faculty self-assessments of their students. J Hormozgan Univ Med Sci2011;
3: 246–253. (in Persian)
8.
RamaligelaSM.Assessing fourth year student-teachers’ understanding of self-evaluation report writing. Proced Soc Behav Sci2014;
116: 3838–3842.
9.
CukusicMGaracaZJadricM.Online self-assessment and students’ success in higher education institutions. Comput Educ2014;
72: 100–109.
10.
BagherzadehRRabieiZTahmasebiR, et al.
The investigation of relationship between self-esteem and clinical self-assessment among paramedical students. Educ Dev Judishapur2018;
9: 166–175. (in Persian)
11.
MolloyEK.The feed forward mechanism: a way forward in clinical learning?Med Educ2010;
44: 1157–1159.
12.
TayebiVArmatMTavakoli GhouchaniH, et al.
Oral versus written feedback delivery to nursing students in clinical education: a randomized controlled trial. Electron Phys2017;
9: 5008–5014.
13.
EmmersonSTillardGOrmondT, et al.
Questions posed within written feedback in clinical education: a research note. Open Rehabil J2011;
4: 28–31.
14.
EmboMPDriessenEWValckeM, et al.
Assessment and feedback to facilitate self-directed learning in clinical practice of Midwifery students. Med Teach2010;
32: 263–269.
15.
MorozAHorlickMMandalaywalaN, et al.
Faculty feedback that begins with resident self‐assessment: motivation is the key to success. Med Educ2018;
52: 314–323.
FrenchJCColbertCYPienLC, et al.
Targeted feedback in the milestones era: utilization of the ask-tell-ask feedback model to promote reflection and self-assessment. J Surg Educ2015;
72: 274–279.
18.
GhanaSSanaguA, MJouybariL.How would the students evaluate themselves in clinical settings: Results of a Study?Educ Dev Judishapur2012;
3: 226–236. (in Persian)
19.
CarterAGCreedyDKSidebothamM.Critical thinking skills in midwifery practice: Development of a self-assessment tool for students. Midwifery2017;
50: 184–192.
20.
HaghaniFR and EhsanpourS.An investigation of “perceived feedback” in clinical education of midwifery students in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ2014;
14: 571–580. (in Persian)
21.
Bahri N, Tabatabaeichehr M, Roudsari R. Comparative assessment of Iranian midwifery education curriculum against the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) global standards for midwifery education. Future of Medical Education Journal 2018; 8: 25–30.
22.
AllenLMolloyE.The influence of a preceptor-student ‘Daily Feedback Tool ‘on clinical feedback practices in nursing education: A qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today2017;
49: 57–62.
23.
Jafarbegloo E, Raisei M and MehranN.Study of relation between test anxiety and clinical performances in midwifery students. Mod Care J2014;
10: 202–209. (in Persian)
24.
HochbergMBermanROgilvieJ, et al.
Mid clerkship feedback in the surgical clerkship: the “Professionalism, Reporting, Interpreting, Managing, Educating, and Procedural Skills” application utilizing learner self-assessment. Am J Surg2017;
213: 212–216.
25.
LaneJLGottliebRP.Improving the interviewing and self-assessment skills of medical students: is it time to readopt videotaping as an educational tool?Ambul Pediatr2004;
4: 244–248.
26.
Adib-HajbagheryMKarbasi-ValashaniKHeidariHaratmehA.Correlation of clinical skills self-assessment of nursing internship trainees with their teachers’ evaluation. Nurs Midwifery Stud2012;
1: 94–99.
27.
Barangar H, Afshari P and Dariosh R. Scrutiny midwifery students’ clinical competence: self-assessment. Educ Dev Judishapur. (Accessed 23 January 2019). (In Persian).
28.
SadegiTAbdoliFEsmaeelzadehS.Comparison of self and instructor evaluation of pediatric nursing trainees in Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. J Nurs Educ2016;
5: 25–31. (in Persian)
29.
Nejad ShamsiPZaker-JafariHBasiratM, et al.
Self-assessment of senior dental students about acquired skills based on the educational program.Res Med Educ2017;
9: 73–78. (in Persian)
30.
MohammadikiaSABagheriMJahanianI, et al.
Self-evaluation of clinical capability of medical practitioners in Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. Teb VA Tazkieh2017;
26: 237–246. (in Persian)
31.
EzzatiRTafazoliMMazlomR, et al.
Evaluation of extent of achieving clinical competencies in midwifery students and its relation with some of the demographic factors. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac2018;
16: 678–685. (in Persian)
32.
Namadi-Vosoughi M, Tazakkori Z, Habibi A, et al. Assessing nursing graduates’ clinical competency from the viewpoints of graduates and head nurses. Journal of Health and Care 2014; 16: 66–73. (In Persian).
33.
PoorheidariMDelvarian-ZadehMYahyaeeS, et al.
Study of the stressful experiences of midwifery students during clinical education in the labor room. Res Med Educ2018;
9: 58–66. (in Persian)
34.
ZiaeeS.The quantity and quality of feedback in clinical education from the viewpoint of midwifery students. Dev Strategies Med Educ2016;
3: 35–47. (in Persian)
35.
TayebiVTavakoli GhoochaniHArmatM.Student and teachers' point of view on feedback and related factors in clinical education. J North Khorasan Univ Med Sci2011;
3: 69–74. (in Persian)
36.
ReddySTZegarekMHFrommeHB, et al.
Barriers and facilitators to effective feedback: a qualitative analysis of data from multispecialty resident focus groups. J Grad Med Edu2015;
7: 214–219.
