Improving Access to Delivery Care and Reducing the Equity Gap Through Voucher Program in Bangladesh: Evidence From Difference-in-Differences Analysis

Abstract

To test a statistically significant change in delivery by medically trained providers following introduction of a demand-side financing voucher, a population-based quasi-experimental study was undertaken, with 3,300 mothers in 2010 and 3,334 mothers at follow-up in 2012 in government-implemented voucher program and control areas. Results found that voucher program was significantly associated with increased public health facility use (difference-in-differences (DID) 13.9) and significantly increased delivery complication management care (DID 13.2) at facility although a null effect was found in facility-based delivery increase. A subset analysis of the five well-functioning facilities showed that facility deliveries increased DID 5.3 percentage points. Quintile-based analysis of all facilities showed that facility delivery increased more than threefold in lower quintile households comparing to twofold in control sites. The program needs better targeting to the beneficiaries, ensuring available gynecologist–anesthetist pair and midwives, effective monitoring, and timely fund reimbursements to facilities.

Keywords

equity access delivery care voucher Bangladesh difference-in-differences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bellows

Warren

. The use of vouchers for reproductive health services in developing countries: systematic review. Trop Med Int Health 2011; 16: 84e96.

Bhatia

Gorter

. Improving access to reproductive and child health services in developing countries: are competitive voucher schemes an option?. J Int Dev 2007; 19: 975e981.

Donaldson

Sethi

Sharma

. Vouchers to improve access by the poor to reproductive health services: Design and early implementation experience of a pilot voucher scheme in Agra district, Uttar Pradesh, India. Health Policy Initiative, Task Order 1, Washington, DC: Futures Group International, 2008.

Horemans

Souk

et al.

Using targeted vouchers and health equity funds to improve access to skilled birth attendants for poor women: a case study in three rural health districts in Cambodia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010; 10: 1. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-1.

Janisch

Albrecht

Wolfschuetz

et al.

Vouchers for health: a demand side output-based aid approach to reproductive health services in Kenya. Global Publ Health 2010; 5: 578e594.

Anwar

Sami

Akhter

et al.

Inequity in maternal health care services: evidence from home-based skilled birth-attendant programmes in Bangladesh. Bul World Health Organ 2008; 86: 252e259.

Behrman

James

. Population and reproductive health: an economic framework for policy evaluation. Popul Dev Rev 1998; 24: 697e737.

Bellows

Kyobutungi

Mutua

et al.

Increase in facility-based deliveries associated with a maternal health voucher programme in informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. Health Policy Plan 2013; 28(2): 134e142.

Meuwissen

Gorter

Knottnerus

AJA

. Impact of accessible sexual and reproductive health care on poor and underserved adolescents in Managua, Nicaragua: a quasi-experimental intervention study. J Adolesc Health 2006; 38: 56.e1e56.e9.

10.

Obare

Warren

Njuki

et al.

Community-level impact of the reproductive health vouchers program on service utilization in Kenya. Health Policy Plan 2013; 28: 165e175.

11.

Rob

Rahman

Bellows

. Evaluation of the impact of the voucher and accreditation approach on improving reproductive behaviors and RH status: Bangladesh. BMC Public Health 2011; 11: 257.

12.

Watt

Abuya

Warren

et al.

Can reproductive health voucher programs improve quality of postnatal care? A quasi-experimental evaluation of Kenya's safe motherhood voucher scheme. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0122828. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122828.

13.

Ahmed

Khan

. Is demand-side financing equity enhancing? Lessons from a maternal health voucher scheme in Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med 2011; 72: 1704–1710.

14.

Nguyen

HTH

Hatt

Islam

et al.

Encouraging maternal health service utilization: An evaluation of the Bangladesh voucher program. Soc Sci Med 2012; 74: 989–996. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.030.

15.

Koehlmoos TLP, Ashraf A, Kabir H, et al. Rapid assessment of demand-side financing experiences in Bangladesh. Working Paper 170, September 2008. Bangladesh, Dhaka: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh.

16.

Bajracharya

Bellows

Dingle

. Evaluation of a voucher programme in reducing inequities in maternal health utilisation in Cambodia: a quasi-experimental study. Lancet 2013; 381: S12. .

17.

Gorter AC and Bellows B. Do competitive voucher schemes improve the provision of health care to underserved and/or vulnerable population groups? Experiences from Nicaragua, India and Africa. In: Invited seminar, Bristol, UK, 24 April 2008.

18.

Gupta

Joe

Rudra

. Demand side financing in health: how far can it address the issue of low utilization in developing countries? World Health report, 2010. Background Paper no. 27, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2010.

19.

United Nations Population Fund. Rapid assessment of Chiranjeevi Yojana in Gujarat, New Delhi, India: United Nations Population Fund, 2006.

20.

Barros

AJD

Ronsmans

Axelson

et al.

Equity in maternal, newborn, and child health interventions in Countdown to 2015: a retrospective review of survey data from 54 countries. Lancet 2012; 379: 1225–1233.

21.

Houweling

TAJ

Ronsmans

Campbell

OMR

et al.

Huge poor-rich inequalities in maternity care: an international comparative study of maternity and child care in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 2007; 85: 745–754.

22.

Creanga

Gillespie

Karklins

Tsui

. Low use of contraception among poor women in Africa: an equity issue. Bull World Health Organ 2011; 89: 258–266.

23.

National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), Mitra and Associates and ICF International. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Dhaka, Bangladesh: NIPORT, Mitra and Associates; Calverton, MD: ICF International, 2014.

24.

Rob

Islam

Anwar

et al.

Population and development: pilot research at community level on linkages between reproductive health and poverty, Dhaka, Bangladesh: Population Council, 2006.

25.

Rahman

Rob

Ahmed

et al.

Voicing the community: A study for the community to identify and prioritize family planning and reproductive health problems, Dhaka, Bangladesh: Population Council, 2006.

26.

National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), Measure Evaluation, and icddr,b. Bangladesh maternal mortality and Health Care Survey 2010, Dhaka, Bangladesh: NIPORT, Measure Evaluation, and icddr,b, 2012.

27.

Directorate General of Health services. Demand side financing orientation manual, Dhaka, Bangladesh: Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, 2007.

28.

Hatt

Nguyen

Sloan

et al.

Economic evaluation of demand-side financing (DSF) for Maternal Health in Bangladesh, Bethesda, MD: Abt Associate, 2010. . Project no. 81107242/03-2255.2-001-00, February 2010.

29.

Bollen

Glanville

Stecklov

. Socioeconomic status and class in studies of fertility and health in developing countries. Ann Rev Sociol 2001; 27: 153e185.

30.

Filmer

Pritchett

. Estimating wealth effect without expenditure data or tears: an application to educational enrollments in States of India. Demography 2001; 38: 115e132.

31.

Filmer

Pritchett

. The effect of household wealth on educational attainment: evidence from 35 countries. Popul Dev Rev 1999; 25: 85e120.

32.

Wagstaff

Watanabe

. What difference does the choice of SES make in health inequality measurement?. Health Econ 2003; 12: 885e890.

33.

Vyas

Kumaranayake

. Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Pol Plan 2006; 21(6): 459–468. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czl029.

34.

O'Donnel

Van Doorsslaer

Wagstaff

et al.

Analyzing health equity using household survey data: a guide to techniques and their implementation, Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2008.

35.

Skiles

Curtis

Basinga

et al.

An equity analysis of performance-based financing in rwanda: are services reaching the poorest women? . Health Pol Plan 2013; 28: 825–837.

36.

Castro-Leal

Dayton

Demery

et al.

Public spending on health care in Africa: do the poor benefit?. Bull World Health Organ 2000; 78: 66e74.

37.

Brazier

Andrzejewski

Perkins

et al.

Improving poor women's access to maternity care: findings from a primary care intervention in Burkina Faso. Soc Sci Med 2009; 69: 682e690.

38.

Bajracharya

Veasnakiry

Rathavy

et al.

Increasing uptake of long-acting reversible contraceptives in Cambodia through a voucher program: Evidence from a difference-in-differences analysis. Glob Health Sci Pract 2016; 4: S109–S121.

39.

Mohanan

Bauhoff

Forgia

et al.

Effect of Chiranjeevi Yojana on institutional deliveries and neonatal and maternal outcomes in Gujarat, India: a difference-in-differences analysis. Bull World Health Organ 2014; 92: 187–194.

40.

Keya

Rahman

Rob

et al.

Distance, mode of transport and transportation cost in the utilization of facility-based maternity services: evidence from rural Bangladesh. Int Q Community Health Educ 2014; 35: 37–51.

41.

Anwar I, Blaakman A, Akhter S. Program evaluation for demand side financing maternal health voucher scheme in Bangladesh. Draft Final Report, Bangladesh, September 2013.

42.

Schmidt

Ensor

Hossain

et al.

Vouchers as demand side financing instruments for health care: a review of the Bangladesh maternal voucher scheme. Health Pol 2010; 96: 98–107.

43.

Rob

Rahman

Bellows

. Using vouchers to increase access to maternal healthcare in Bangladesh. Int Q Community Health Educ 2010; 30: 293–309.

44.

Grainger

Gorter

Okal

et al.

Lessons from sexual and reproductive health voucher program design and function: a comprehensive review. Int J Equity Health 2014; 13: 33. DOI: 10.1186/1475-9276-13-33.