To increase environmental health literacy (EHL) and leadership skills in Latino youth in Salinas, CA., we worked from 2012–2015 with 15 members of the CHAMACOS Youth Community Council (YCC), an outreach arm of a longitudinal study of impacts of environmental chemicals on children’s health. The YCC program provided hands-on research experiences related to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) in cosmetics and their possible health effects. We use participatory research principles and Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives to describe the development of EHC and leadership in the youth co-researchers. Using data from multiple qualitative sources, we explore the youths' engagement in a wide range of research and action processes. Promising outcomes, including perceptions of improved youth self-esteem, EHL, leadership, and career orientation are discussed, as are challenges, such as time constraints and high priority youth concerns not addressed by the study. Implications for other youth-engaged participatory science and leadership programs are presented.
IsraelBAEngESchulzAJ. Methods for community-based participatory research for health, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2013.
2.
CargoMMercerSL. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu Rev Public Health2008; 29: 325–350.
3.
MinklerMEnhancing data quality, relevance and use through community-based participatory research. In: CytronNPetitKKingsleyGT (eds). What counts? Harvesting data for American's communities, San Francisco: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and Urban Institute, 2014, pp. 245–259.
4.
Cacari-StoneLWallersteinNGarciaAP. The promise of community-based participatory research for health equity: a conceptual model for bridging evidence with policy. Am J Public Health2014; 104: 1615–1623.
5.
OzerEJYouth-led participatory action research. In: JasonLAGlenwickDS (eds). Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2016.
6.
WilsonNDashoSMartinAC. Engaging young adolescents in social action through photovoice the youth empowerment strategies (YES!) project. J Early Adolesc2007; 27: 241–261.
7.
BergfeldWEBelsitoDVMarksJG. Safety of ingredients used in cosmetics. J Am Acad Dermatol2005; 52: 125–132.
8.
Futran FuhrmanVTalAArnonS. Why endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) challenge traditional risk assessment and how to respond. J Hazard Mater2014; 286C: 589–611.
9.
CDC. Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. Department of Health and Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/pdf/fourthreport.pdf.
Harley KG, Kogut K, Madrigal DS, et al. Reducing phthalate, paraben, and phenol exposure from personal care products in adolescent girls: findings from the HERMOSA intervention study. Environ Health Perspect 2016. DOI: 10.1289/EHP.1510514.
12.
BruggeDReisnerEPadró-MartínezLT. In-home air filtration for improving cardiovascular health: lessons from a CBPR study in public housing. Prog Community Health Partnersh2013; 7: 49–56.
13.
MinklerMVásquezVBShepardP. Promoting environmental health policy through community based participatory research: a case study from Harlem, New York. J Urban Health2006; 83: 101–110.
14.
SaddJMorello-FroschRPastorM. The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the ground-truth: methods to advance environmental justice and researcher-community partnerships. Health Educ Behav2014; 41: 281–290.
15.
LeffSSThomasDEVaughnNA. Using community-based participatory research to develop the PARTNERS youth violence prevention program. Prog Community Health Partnersh2010; 4: 207–216.
16.
BrownPZavestoskiSMcCormickS. Embodied health movements: new approaches to social movements in health. Social Health Ill2004; 26: 50–80.
17.
CushingLMorello-FroschRWanderM. The haves, the have-nots, and the health of everyone: the relationship between social inequality and environmental quality. Annu Rev Public Health2015; 36: 193–209.
18.
FinnSO'FallonL. The emergence of environmental health literacy-from its roots to its future potential. Environ Health Perspect2015.
19.
BloomBS. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals, New York, NY: Longmans, Green, 1956.
20.
IsraelBASchulzAJParkerEA. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health1998; 19: 173–202.
21.
Minkler M and Wallerstein N. Introduction to community-based participatory research. In: Minkler M and Wallerstein N (eds) Community-based participatory research for health from process to outcome. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
22.
O'FallonLRDearryA. Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences. Environ Health Perspect2002; 110: 155–159.
23.
EskenaziB. CHAMACOS, a longitudinal birth cohort study: lessons from the fields. J Child Health2003; 1: 3–27.
24.
MadrigalDSSalvatoreACasillasG. Health in my community: conducting and evaluating photo voice as a tool to promote environmental health and leadership among Latino/a youth. Prog Community Health Partnersh2014; 8: 317–329.
25.
CatalaniCMinklerM. Photovoice: a review of the literature in health and public health. Health Educ Behav2010; 37: 424–451.
26.
WangCBurrisMA. Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Educ Behav1997; 24: 369–387.
27.
GuerreroJMadrigalDSMinklerM. What is …? A research ethics jeopardy “game to help community partners understand human subjects protections and their importance. Prog Community Health Partnersh2014; 8: 405–411.
28.
MinklerGarciaAPRubinV. Community-based participatory research: a strategy for building healthy communities and promoting health through policy change, Oakland, CA: PolicyLink, 2012.
29.
GarciaAPCardenasZPorterC. Engaging homeless youth in Community-based participatory research: a case study from Skid Row, Los Angeles. Health Promot Pract2014; 15: 18–27.
30.
OzerEJRittermanMLWanisMG. Participatory action research (PAR) in middle school: opportunities, constraints, and key processes. Am J Commun Psychol2010; 46: 152–166.
31.
KrathwohlDR. A revision of bloom's taxonomy: an overview. Theory Into Pract2002; 41: 212–218.
32.
BalazsCLMorello-FroschR. The three r's: how community based participatory research strengthens the rigor, relevance and reach of science. Environ Justice2013; 6: 9–16.
33.
JacquezFVaughnLMWagnerE. Youth as partners, participants or passive recipients: a review of children and adolescents in community-based participatory research (CBPR). Am J Commun Psychol2013; 51: 176–189.
34.
OzerEJNewlanSDouglasL. “Bounded” empowerment: analyzing tensions in the practice of youth-led participatory research in urban public schools. Am J Commun Psychol2013; 52: 13–26.
35.
MendenhallTJGagnerNEHuntQA. A call to engage youth in health research. Fam Syst Health2015; 33: 410–412.
36.
BrulleRJPellowDN. Environmental justice: human health and environmental inequalities. Annu Rev Public Health2006; 27: 103–124.
37.
Morello-FroschRZukMJerrettM. Understanding the cumulative impacts of inequalities in environmental health: implications for policy. Health Aff2011; 30: 879–887.
MosavelMSimonCvan StadeD. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) in South Africa: engaging multiple constituents to shape the research question. Soc Sci Med2005; 61: 2577–2587.
