The purpose of this study was to develop a peer-report measure of social transactions used to infer liking by peers. Sixty-five early adolescents were interviewed concerning the behavioral basis of their impressions of who liked or disliked them in their class. Twenty-two behavioral cues for liking between children were then tentatively identified. To confirm the communicative potential of these behaviors, another sample of 260 Grade 5 students read a series of hypothetical vignettes. All positive behaviors led to inferences of liking. The six negative behaviors were consistently associated with inferences of disliking. These behaviors were incorporated into a rating scale and administered, along with a set of other peer-report measures, to a third sample of Grade 5 students. Results of this last study suggest that this scale is a reasonably good measure of social transactions that may be important for communicating levels of liking and relational interest between children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berndt, T. J.
, & Das, R. (1987). Effects of popularity and friendship on perceptions of the personality and social behavior of peers. Journal of Early Adolescence, 7, 429-439.
2.
Berndt, T. J.
, & Perry, T. B. (1986). Children's perceptions of friendships as supportive relationships. Developmental Psychology, 22, 640-648.
3.
Bierman, K. L.
, & McCauley, E. (1987). Children's descriptions of their peer interactions: Useful information for clinical child assessment. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 16, 9-18.
4.
Bukowski, W. M.
, & Hoza, B. (1989). Popularity and friendship: Issues in theory, measurement and outcome. In T. J. Berndt & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relations in child development (pp. 15-45). New York: Wiley.
5.
Bukowski, W. M.
, & Kramer, T. L. (1986). Judgments of the features of friendship among early adolescent boys and girls. Journal of Early Adolescence, 6, 331-338.
6.
Carlson, D. L.
, Lahey, B. B., & Neeper, R. (1984). Peer assessment of the social behavior of accepted, rejected and neglected children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 189-198.
7.
Coie, J. D.
, & Dodge, K. A. (1988). Multiple sources of data on social behavior and social status in the school: A cross-age comparison. Child Development, 59, 815-829.
8.
Coie, J.
, Dodge, K., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions of social status, a cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-571.
9.
Coie, J. D.
, Dodge, K. A., & Kuperschmidt, J. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Children's status in the peer group. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Foster, S. L.
, DeLawyer, D. D., & Guevremont, D. C. (1986). A critical incidents analysis of liked and disliked peer behaviors and their situational parameters in childhood and adolescence. Behavioral Assessment, 8, 115-133.
11.
Fry, E.
(1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 2, 513-518.
12.
Furman, W.
, & Robbins, P. (1985). What's the point? Issues in the selection of treatment objectives. In B. Schneider, K. Rubin, & J. Ledingham (Eds.), Children's peer relations: Issues in assessment and intervention (pp. 141-154). New York: Springer-Verlag.
13.
Greenwood, C. R.
, Walker, H. M., & Hops, H. (1977). Issues in social interaction/withdrawal assessment. Exceptional Children, 43, 490-499.
14.
Ladd, G. W.
(1985). Documenting the effects of social skills training with children: Process and outcome assessment. In B. H. Schneider, K. H. Rubin, & J. E. Ledingham (Eds.), Children's peer relations: Issues in assessment and intervention (pp. 243-270). New York: Springer-Verlag.
15.
Masten, A.
, Morison, P., & Pellegrini, D. S. (1985). A revised class play method of peer assessment. Developmental Psychology, 21, 523-533.
16.
Milich, R.
, & Landau, S. (1984). A comparison of the social status and social behavior of aggressive and aggressive/withdrawn boys. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 189-198.
17.
Murphy, K.
, & Schneider, B. (1994). Coaching socially rejected early adolescents regarding behaviors used by peers to infer liking: A dyad-specific intervention. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14 (1), 82-94.
18.
Newcomb, A.
, & Bukowski, W. (1983). Social impact and social preference as determinants of children's peer group status. Developmental Psychology, 19, 856-867.
19.
Newcomb, A. F.
, & Bukowski, W. (1984). A longitudinal study of the utility of social preference and social impact classification schemes. Child Development, 55, 1434-1447.
20.
Parker, J. G.
, & Gottman, J. M. (1989). Social and emotional development in a relational context: Friendship interaction from early childhood to adolescence. In T. J. Berndt & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships in child development (pp. 95-131). New York: Wiley.
21.
Pekarik, E.
, Prinz, R., Liebert, D., Weintraub, S., & Neale, J. (1976). The Pupil Evaluation Inventory: A sociometric technique for assessing children's social behaviors. Journal of Abnormal and Clinical Psychology, 4, 83-97.
22.
Serbin, L. A.
, Lyons, J. A., Marchessault, K., Schwartzman, A. E., & Ledingham, J. E. (1987). Observational validation of a peer nomination technique for identifying aggressive, withdrawn and aggressive/withdrawn children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 109-110.
23.
Welkowitz, J.
, Ewen, R. B., & Cohen, J. (1982). Introductory statistics for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
