Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Little research has been done to test hypotheses generated from Elkind's theory of adolescent egocentrism and its related construct, the imaginary audience. This study used Elkind and Bowen's Imaginary Audience Scale and investigated the relationship of cognitive developmental level and social experience to heightened sensitivity to the existence of an imaginary audience. It was predicted that social experience, as indicated by grade level and transition from elementary to high school, would relate to heightened sensitivity at least as consistently as cognitive level and that formal operational thought would not occur as prerequisite to this aspect of adolescent egocentrism, depending on social experience. Six hundred and seventy-five students in grades 6, 8, 9, and 12 were studied. Results indicated that higher sensitivity to an imaginary audience occurred at grades 8 and 9 regardless of cognitive level. In fact formal operational thinkers were observed only at grade 12 (n = 8), indicating that formal operational thought is not necessary in accounting for the onset of adolescent egocentrism, at least as represented by an imaginary audience.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams, G. R. , & Jones, R. M. (1981). Imaginary audience behavior: A validation study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 1, 1-10.

Blasi, A. , & Hoeffel, E. C. (1974). Adolescence and formal operations. Human Development, 17, 344-363.

Elkind, D. (1967). Egocentrism in adolescence. Child Development, 38, 1025-1934.

Elkind, D. (1968). Adolescent cognitive development. In J. F. Adams , (Ed.) Understanding adolescence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Elkind, D. (1970). Children and adolescents: Interpretive essays on Jean Piaget. New York: Oxford University Press.

Elkind, D. (1978). The child's reality: Three developmental themes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Elkind, D. , & Bowen, R. (1979). Imaginary audience behavior in children and adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 15, 38-44.

Gray, W. M. , & Hudson, L. M. (1984). Formal operations and the imaginary audience. Developmental Psychology, 20, 619-627.

Lawson, A. E. (1978). The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning. Journal of Research and Science Teaching, 15, 11-24.

10.

Pesce, R. C. (1983). The imaginary audience scale and its relationship to cognitive development, grade level, and gender. Unpublished dissertation, Loyola University of Chicago.

11.

Peterson, C. (1982). The imaginary audience and age, cognition, and dating. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 140, 317-318.

12.

Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.

13.

Piaget, J. (1973). The child in reality. New York: Viking Press.

14.

Shute, G. E. (1984). The assessment of formal-operational reasoning: A caution. Genetic Epistemologist, 12, 6-7.

15.

Simmons, R. G. , Rosenberg, F. , & Rosenberg, M. (1973). Disturbance in the self-image at adolescence. American Sociological Review, 38, 553-568.

16.

Tanner, J. M. (1971). Sequence, tempo, and individual variation in the growth and development of boys and girls aged twelve to sixteen. Daedalus, 907-930.

Imaginary Audience Behavior and its Relationship to Operational thought and Social Experience

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References