This study explored the hypothesis that explicit performance feedback would moderate sex differences in performance expectations (self-efficacy) and attributions. Within this context, this study investigated whether achievement cognitions differed as a function of grade level. Male and female students in grades six and eight judged their self-efficacy for learning a novel mathematical task (residues), after which they individually completed a written packet that provided instruction and practice opportunities. Students received performance feedback by checking answers to alternate problems. Following training, attributions and self-efficacy for solving residue problems were assessed. Although girls initially judged self-efficacy lower than boys, no sex differences were obtained on any measure following training. Sixth graders made higher effort attributions and demonstrated lower residue skill than eighth-grade students. Implications for teaching are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bandura, A.
(1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
2.
Bandura, A.
(1981). Self-referent thought: A developmental analysis of self-efficacy. In J. H. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Social cognitive development: Frontiers and possible futures (pp. 200-239). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Bandura, A.
(1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
4.
Bandura, A.
, & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586-598.
5.
Broverman, I. K.
, Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59-78.
6.
Crandall, V. C.
(1969). Sex differences in expectancy of intellectual and academic reinforcement. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Achievement-related motives in children (pp. 11-45). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7.
Deaux, K.
(1976). Sex: A perspective on the attribution process. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 335-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Dweck, C. S.
, Davidson, W., Nelson, S., & Enna, B. (1978). Sex differences in leamed helplessness: II. The contingencies of evaluative feedback in the classroom and HI. An experimental analysis. Developmental Psychology, 14, 268-276.
9.
Edwards, A. L.
(1976). An introduction to linear regression and correlation. San Francisco: Freeman.
10.
Etaugh, C.
, & Brown, B. (1975). Perceiving the causes of success and failure of male and female performers. Developmental Psychology, 11, 103.
11.
Fennema, E.
, & Sherman, J. (1978). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement and related factors: A further study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9, 189-203.
12.
Fontaine, G.
(1974). Social comparison and some determinants of expected personal control and expected performance in a novel task situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 487-496.
13.
Frieze, I. H.
(1980). Beliefs about success and failure in the classroom. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), The social psychology of school learning (pp. 39-78). New York: Academic Press.
14.
Harari, O.
, & Covington, M. V. (1981). Reactions to achievement behavior from a teacher and student perspective: A developmental analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 15-28.
15.
Heider, F.
(1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
16.
Heller, K. A.
, & Parsons, J. E. (1981). Sex differences in teachers' evaluative feedback and students' expectancies for success in mathematics. Child Development, 52, 1015-1019.
17.
Kelley, H. H.
(1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
18.
Lenney, E.
(1977). Women's self-confidence in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 1-13.
19.
Lenney, E.
& Gold, J. (1982). Sex differences in self-confidence: The effects of task completion and of comparison to competent others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 74-80.
20.
Maccoby, E. E.
, & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
McHugh, M. C.
(1982, March). The effects of sex linkage of task, ambiguity offeedback, and competition on the performance expectancies of males and females. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
22.
McMahan, I. D.
(1973). Relationships between causal attributions and expectancy of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 108-114.
23.
Meece, J. L.
, Parsons, J. E., Kaczala, C. M., Goff, S. B., & Futterman, R. (1982). Sex differences in math achievement: Toward a model of academic choice. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 324-348.
24.
Nicholls, J. G.
(1978). The development of the concepts of effort and ability, perception of academic attainment, and the understanding that difficult tasks require more ability. Child Development, 49, 800-814.
25.
Nicholls, J. G.
(1979). Development of perception of own attainment and causal attribution for success and failure in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 94-99.
26.
Parsons, J. E.
(1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: Freeman.
27.
Parsons, J. E.
, & Ruble, D. N. (1977). The development of achievement-related expectancies. Child Development, 48, 1075-1079.
28.
Parsons, J. E.
, Ruble, D. N., Hodges, K. L., & Small, A. W. (1976). Cognitive-developmental factors in emerging sex differences in achievement-related expectancies. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 47-61.
29.
Pollis, N. P.
, & Doyle, D. C. (1972). Sex-role status and perceived competence among first graders. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 34, 235-238.
30.
Schunk, D. H.
(1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 93-105.
31.
Schunk, D. H.
(in press, a). Ability versus effort attributional feedback: Differential effects on self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology.
32.
Schunk, D. H.
(in press, b). Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist.
33.
Weiner, B.
(1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3-25.
34.
Weiner, B.
(1983). Some methodological pitfalls in attributional research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 530-543.
35.
Weiner, B.
, Frieze, I., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S., & Rosenbaum, R. M. (1971). Perceiving the causes of success and failure. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 95-120). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
36.
Weiner, B.
, Nierenberg, R., & Goldstein, M. (1976). Social learning (locus of control) versus attributional (causal stability) interruptions of expectancy of success. Journal of Personality, 44, 52-68.
37.
Wolleat, P. L.
, Pedro, J. D., Becker, A. D., & Fennema, E. (1980) Sex differences in high school students' causal attributions of performance in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11, 356-366.
