This study examines whether sex moderates the relationship between peer delinquency and participant delinquency as mediated by moral neutralization. Participants for this study were 2209 early adolescent youth (1053 boys and 1156 girls) from the Gang Resistance Education and Training (GREAT) study. In the current moderated mediation analysis, peer delinquency served as the independent variable, moral neutralization served as the mediating variable, delinquency variety served as the dependent variable, and sex acted as a moderating variable. Results showed that the peer influence effect (peer delinquency → moral neutralization → delinquency variety), while significant in both boys and girls, was stronger in girls than in boys. This provides further evidence that sex is capable of moderating important criminological relationships and that a fine-tuned analysis of crime and delinquency requires that we investigate potentially important sex differences in criminological constructs and the theories upon which they are based.
AfshordiN.LibermanZ. (2021). Keeping friends in mind: Development of friendship concepts in early childhood. Social Development, 30(2), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12493
2.
AkersR. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Northeastern University Press.
3.
AllisonP. D. (2002). Missing data. Sage.
4.
BanduraA. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724022014322
5.
BurkW. J.van der VorstH.KerrM.StattinH. (2012). Alcohol use and friendship dynamics: Selection and socialization in early-, middle-, and late-adolescent peer networks. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2012.73.89
6.
CarsonD. C. (2013). Perceptions of prosocial and delinquent peer behavior and the effect on delinquent attitudes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(3), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.01.005
7.
Chesney-LindM.PaskoL. (2004). The female offender: Girls, women and crime (2nd ed.). Sage.
8.
ChuD. C.HebentonB.TohA. (2021). Gender equality and female offending: Evidence from international data sources. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 65(13-14), 1496–1519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20986527
DavisC.TangC.KoJ. (2004). The impact of peer, family and school on delinquency: A study of at-risk Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. International Social Work, 47(4), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872804046255
12.
DoljanacR. F.ZimmermanM. A. (1998). Psychosocial factors and high-risk sexual behavior: Race differences among urban adolescents. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21(5), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018784326191
13.
DongB.KrohnM. D. (2016). Dual trajectories of gang affiliation and delinquent peer association during adolescence: An examination of long-term offending outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(4), 746–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0417-2
14.
ElwertF.WinshipC. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043455
15.
EsbensenF.-A. (2002). National evaluation of the gang resistance education and training (G.R.E.A.T.) program: Final report (94-IJ-CX-0058): U.S. Department of Justice.
16.
FaganA. A.Van HornM. L.HawkinsJ. D.ArthurM. W. (2007). Gender similarities and differences in association between risk and protective factors and self-reported serious delinquency. Prevention Science: The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 8(2), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-006-0062-1
17.
FoscoW. D.HawkL. W.ColderC. R.MeiselS. N.LenguaL. J. (2019). The development of inhibitory control in adolescence and prospective relations with delinquency. Journal of Adolescence, 76, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.08.008
18.
Gómez-TabaresA. S. (2024). Social-cognitive mechanisms of moral disengagement, gender differences and psychological predictors in young populations. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 32(2), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v32n2.102537
19.
GraifC. (2015). Delinquency and gender moderation in the moving to opportunity intervention: The role of extended neighborhoods. Criminology, 53(3), 366–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12078
20.
HalpernD. F. (2011). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). Psychology Press.
21.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford.
22.
HaynieD. L.DooganN. J.SollerB. (2014). Gender, friendship networks, and delinquency: A dynamic network approach. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 52(4), 688–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12052
IBM Corporation. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Author.
25.
JenningsW. G.Maldonado-MolinaM. M.KomroK. A. (2010). Sex similarities/differences in trajectories of delinquency among urban Chicago youth: The role of delinquent peers. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-009-9066-2
26.
JohnsonR. E. (1979). Juvenile delinquency and its origins: An integrated theoretical approach. Cambridge University Press.
27.
KerrM.Van ZalkM.StattinH. (2012). Psychopathic traits moderate peer influence on adolescent delinquency. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 53(8), 826–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02492.x
28.
KollerováL.JanošováP.RičanP. (2014). Moral disengagement from bullying: The effects of gender and classroom. The New Educational Review, 37(3), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.14.37.3.22
29.
LightJ. M.GreenanC. C.RusbyJ. C.NiesK. M.SnijdersT. A. B. (2013). Onset to first alcohol use in early adolescence: A network diffusion model. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12064
30.
LiuL. (2023). Is peer influence gender and age specific? Findings from a sample of justice-involved individuals. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 67(13-14), 1425–1446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X231172647
31.
Lutgen-NievesL.PettyT. (2024). “I had some memories that popped up again from my childhood:” Perspectives of incarcerated women on the initiation and continuation of substance use. Feminist Criminology, 19(2), 154–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851231220105
McMillanC.FelmleeD.OsgoodD. W. (2018). Peer influence, friend selection, and gender: How network processes shape adolescent smoking, drinking, and delinquency. Social Networks, 55, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.05.008
34.
McNeeleyS. (2019). Gendered pathways into co-offending among a sample of adult burglary and robbery offenders. Minnesota Department of Corrections.
35.
MercerN.CrocettiE.MeeusW.BranjeS. (2018). An experimental investigation of the influence of deviant peers on own deviancy: A replication study. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 14(3), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-017-9305-3
MotivansM. (2022). Federal justice statistics, 2021 (NCJ 305127). Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
38.
MowenT. J.BomanJ. H. (2019). (Re)Recognizing the multidimensional roles of family and peers on crime. Sociology Compass, 14(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12762
39.
MüllerC. M.HofmannV.ArmS. (2017). Susceptibility to classmates’ influence on delinquency during early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 37(9), 1221–1253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616653475
40.
PaternosterR.McGloinJ. M.NguyenH.ThomasK. J. (2013). The causal impact of exposure to deviant peers: An experimental investigation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50(4), 476–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427812444274
41.
PierceJ.SchmidtC.StoddardS. A. (2015). The role of feared possible selves in the relationship between peer influence and delinquency. Journal of Adolescence, 38, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.10.009
42.
PiqueroN. L.GoverA. R.MacDonaldJ. M.PiqueroA. R. (2005). The influence of delinquent peers on delinquency: Does gender matter?Youth & Society, 36(3), 251–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X04265652
43.
RyaliS.ZhangY.de los AngelesC.Supekark.MemonV. (2024). Deep learning models reveal replicable, generalizable, and behaviorally relevant sex differences in human functional brain organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(9), Article e231001212. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2310012121
44.
SalisburyE. J.Van VoorhisP. (2009). Gendered pathways: A quantitative investigation of women probationers’ paths to incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 541–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809334076
45.
SijtsemaJ. J.LindenbergS. M. (2018). Peer influence in the development of adolescent antisocial behavior: Advances from dynamic social network studies. Developmental Review, 50, 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.08.002
46.
SteffensmeierD.AllanE. (1996). Gender and crime: Toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 459–487. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.459
47.
SteketeeM.JungerM.Junger-TasJ. (2013). Sex differences in the predictors of juvenile delinquency: Females are more susceptible to poor environments; Males are influenced more by low self-control. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 29(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986212470888
48.
SutherlandE. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). J. B. Lippincott.
UrbergK. A.DeğirmencioğluS. M.PilgrimC. (1997). Close friend and group influence on adolescent cigarette smoking and alcohol use. Developmental Psychology, 33(5), 834–844. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.33.5.834
51.
WaltersG. D. (2016). Friends, cognition, and delinquency: Proactive and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the peer influence and peer selection effects among male delinquents. Justice Quarterly, 33(6), 1055–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2015.1039048
52.
WaltersG. D. (2020). Perceived peer delinquency, proactive criminal thinking, neighborhood disorder, and serious offending: Moderated mediation and theoretical integration. Journal of Crime and Justice, 43(4), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.2019.1701527
53.
WaltersG. D. (2022). Criminality and crime: A social-cognitive-developmental theory of delinquent and criminal behavior. Lexington Books.
54.
WardJ. T.ForneyM. (2020). Unpacking within- and between-person effects of unstructured socializing and differential association on solo- and co-offending. Journal of Criminal Justice, 70, 101720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101720
WeermanF. M. (2011). Delinquent peers in context: A longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence effects. Criminology, 49(1), 253–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00223.x
57.
WeermanF. M.HoeveM. (2012). Peers and delinquency among girls and boys: Are sex differences in delinquency explained by peer factors?European Journal of Criminology, 9(3), 228–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370811435736
YinglingJ. (2016). Gendered pathways to crime. In HuebnerB. M.BynumT. S. (Eds.), The handbook of measurement issues in criminology and criminal justice (pp. 181–201). Wiley Blackwell.
