Abstract
Studies have consistently shown emotion dysregulation to be a transdiagnostic risk factor for psychological and behavioral outcomes, yet less work has identified environmental predictors of such dysregulation. Taking a social ecological approach, we investigated if proximal processes associated with micro-contexts of family, school, and peers (e.g., family conflict), as well as macro-contexts (neighborhood and socioeconomic status) and their interactions predicted overall emotional dysregulation and use of emotion regulation (ER) strategies in early adolescence. Data from Wave 4 of the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) study were used (N = 6251). Results showed support for hypotheses with multiple micro-contexts being associated with each ER outcome at varying strengths. Contrary to expectations, there was little evidence for macro-contexts and associated interactions as predictors of ER. Future directions are explored, with an emphasis on what factors may be more relevant to ER in early adolescence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
