The paper investigates gender differences in coolness dynamics among early and middle adolescents in a Hungarian panel dataset, which followed students from grade 5 (age 11–12) to grade 8 (age 14–15). Drawing on Gender Prototypicality Theory, we expected significantly different gendered patterns in the association between coolness and various forms of aggression, academic performance, physical attractiveness, BMI, and two forms of risk behavior (smoking, drinking). However, our multilevel models showed that behaviors traditionally considered masculine tended to be associated with coolness for both sexes, but in particular for girls. Some traditionally masculine behaviors (such as verbal aggression, smoking, or lower GPA) tended to be more strongly or only associated with status among girls. On the other hand, while physical attractiveness was associated with status for both sexes, this association was stronger among boys. Cultural and contextual explanations, as well as policy implications, are also discussed.
AdlerP. A.AdlerP. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. Rutgers University Press.
2.
AdlerP. A.KlessS. J.AdlerP. (1992). Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and girls. Sociology of Education, 65(3), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112807
3.
AntonakisJ.BastardozN.RönkköM. (2021). On ignoring the random effects assumption in multilevel models: Review, critique, and recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 24(2), 443–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119877457
4.
BellmoreA.VillarrealV. M.HoA. Y. (2011). Staying cool across the first year of middle school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(7), 776–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9590-x
5.
BergerC.BatanovaM.CanceJ. D. (2015). Aggressive and prosocial? Examining latent profiles of behavior, social status, machiavellianism, and empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2230–2244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0298-9
6.
BukowskiW. M. (2011). Popularity as a social concept: Meanings and significance. In CillessenA. H. N.SchwartzD.MayeuxL. (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 3–24). The Guilford Press.
7.
CasperD. M.CardN. A.BarlowC. (2020). Relational aggression and victimization during adolescence: A meta-analytic review of unique associations with popularity, peer acceptance, rejection, and friendship characteristics. Journal of Adolescence, 80(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.012
8.
CillessenA. H. N.MarksP. E. L. (2017). Methodological choices in peer nomination research. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2017(157), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20206
9.
CillessenA. H. N.MayeuxL. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75(1), 147–163.
10.
CillessenA. H. N.MayeuxL. (2007). Expectations and perceptions at school transitions: The role of peer status and aggression. Journal of School Psychology, 45(5), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.05.004
ColemanJ. S. (1961). The adolescent society: The social life of the teenager and its impact on education. Free Press.
13.
CurrieD. H.KellyD. M.PomerantzS. (2007). The power to squash people’: Understanding girls’ relational aggression. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690600995974
14.
de BruynE. H.CillessenA. H. N. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: Prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21(6), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558406293966
15.
DijkstraJ. K.GestS. D. (2015). Peer norm salience for academic achievement, prosocial behavior, and bullying: Implications for adolescent school experiences. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614524303
16.
DuncanN. (2004). It’s important to be nice, but it’s nicer to be important: Girls, popularity and sexual competition. Sex Education, 4(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681810410001678329
EderD. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58(3), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112416
19.
EderD.ColleenC.ParkerS. (1995). School talk: Gender and adolescent culture. Rutgers University Press.
20.
EndersC. K.DuH.KellerB. T. (2020). A model-based imputation procedure for multilevel regression models with random coefficients, interaction effects, and nonlinear terms. Psychological Methods, 25(1), 88–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000228
21.
EngelsM. C.ColpinH.Van LeeuwenK.BijttebierP.Den NoortgateW. V.ClaesS.GoossensL.VerschuerenK. (2017). School engagement trajectories in adolescence: The role of peer likeability and popularity. Journal of School Psychology, 64(October 2017), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.006
22.
EriksenI. M. (2019). Tough femininities: Ethnic minority girls’ aggressive school opposition. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 40(8), 1090–1104. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2019.1646113
FrankenA.HarakehZ.VeenstraR.VolleberghW.DijkstraJ. K. (2017). Social status of adolescents with an early onset of externalizing behavior: The SNARE Study. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 37(8), 1037–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616636478
25.
FurmanW.RoseA. J. (2015). Friendships, romantic relationships, and peer relationships. In Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 1–43). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy322
26.
GarnerR.BootcheckJ.LorrM.RauchK. (2006). The adolescent society revisited: Cultures, crowds, climates, and status structures in seven secondary schools. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(6), 1023–1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9060-7
27.
GommansR.SandstromM. J.StevensG. W. J. M.ter BogtT. F. M.CillessenA. H. N. (2017). Popularity, likeability, and peer conformity: Four field experiments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73(November 2017), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.001
HoffK. E.Reese-WeberM.Joel SchneiderW.StaggJ. W. (2009). The association between high status positions and aggressive behavior in early adolescence. Journal of School Psychology, 47(6), 395–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.07.003
30.
HofstedeG.HofstedeG. J.MinkovM. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
31.
Hopmeyer GormanA.KimJ.SchimmelbuschA. (2002). The attributes adolescents associate with peer popularity and teacher preference. Journal of School Psychology, 40(2), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(02)00092-4
32.
HoxJ. J.MoerbeekM.van de SchootR. (2017). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (3rd ed.). Routledge.
33.
JamisonR. S.WilsonT.RyanA. (2015). Too cool for school? The relationship between coolness and academic reputation in early adolescence. Social Development, 24(2), 384–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12097
34.
JewellJ. A.BrownC. S. (2014). Relations among gender typicality, peer relations, and mental health during early adolescence. Social Development, 23(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12042
KieferS. M.WangJ. H. (2016). Associations of coolness and social goals with aggression and engagement during adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 44(May-June 2016), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2016.02.007
37.
KimJ.CillessenA. H. N. (2023). Peer community and teacher closeness as moderators of the association between peer status and aggression. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 43(8), 1043–1070. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316221142254
38.
KleiserM.MayeuxL. (2021). Popularity and gender prototypicality: An experimental approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(1), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01344-5
39.
Kleiser PolkM.MayeuxL. (2023). Associations between peer-perceived and self-perceived gender typicality and peer status in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 43(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316221105604
40.
KovátsE.PetőA. (2017). Anti-gender discourses in Hungary: A discourse without a movement? In KuharR.PaternotteD. (Eds.), Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality. Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd.
41.
LaFontanaK. M.CillessenA. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19(1), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x
42.
Laninga-WijnenL.HarakehZ.DijkstraJ. K.VeenstraR.VolleberghW. (2018). Aggressive and prosocial peer norms: Change, stability, and associations with adolescent aggressive and prosocial behavior development. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(2), 178–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616665211
43.
LuT.JinS.LiL.NiuL.ChenX.FrenchD. C. (2018). Longitudinal associations between popularity and aggression in Chinese middle and high school adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 54(12), 2291–2301. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000591
44.
MayeuxL.HouserJ. J.DychesK. D. (2011). Social acceptance and popularity: Two distinct forms of peer status. In CillessenA. H. N.SchwartzD.MayeuxL. (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 79–102). The Guilford Press.
45.
MayeuxL.KleiserM. (2020). A Gender prototypicality theory of adolescent peer popularity. Adolescent Research Review, 5(3), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00123-z
MeijsN.CillessenA. H. N.ScholteR. H. J.SegersE.SpijkermanR. (2010). Social intelligence and academic achievement as predictors of adolescent popularity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9373-9
48.
MertenD. E. (1997). The meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition, and conflict among junior high school girls (70, pp. 175–191). JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673207
49.
MurnenS. K.KarazsiaB. T. (2017). A review of research on men’s body image and drive for muscularity. In The psychology of men and masculinities (pp. 229–257). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000023-009
50.
NiuL.JinS.LiL.FrenchD. C. (2016). Popularity and social preference in Chinese adolescents: Associations with social and behavioral adjustment. Social Development, 25(4), 828–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12172
51.
PellegriniA. D.LongJ. D. (2007). An observational study of early heterosexual interaction at middle school dances. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(4), 613–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00538.x
52.
PrinsteinM. J.Choukas-BradleyS. C.HelmsS. W.BrechwaldW. A.RancourtD. (2011). High peer popularity longitudinally predicts adolescent health risk behavior, or does it? An examination of linear and quadratic associations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 36(9), 980–990. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsr053
53.
PuckettM. B.AikinsJ. W.CillessenA. H. N. (2008). Moderators of the association between relational aggression and perceived popularity. Aggressive Behavior, 34(6), 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20280
54.
ReadB.FrancisB.SkeltonC. (2011). Gender, popularity and notions of in/authenticity amongst 12‐year‐old to 13‐year‐old school girls. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2011.547304
55.
RodkinP. C.FarmerT. W.PearlR.AckerR. V. (2006). They’re cool: Social status and peer group supports for aggressive boys and girls. Social Development, 15(2), 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9507.2006.00336.x
56.
RodkinP. C.FarmerT. W.PearlR.Van AckerR. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.36.1.14
57.
RogersL. O.YangR.WayN.WeinbergS. L.BennetA. (2020). “We’re supposed to look like girls, but act like boys”: Adolescent girls’ adherence to masculinity norms. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30(S1), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12475
58.
RoseA. J.GlickG. C.SmithR. L. (2011). Popularity and gender: The two cultures of boys and girls. In CillessenA. H. N.SchwartzD.MayeuxL. (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 103–122). The Guilford Press.
59.
RoseA. J.SwensonL. P.WallerE. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40(3), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.3.378
60.
RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.BowkerJ. C. (2015). Children in peer groups. In Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 1–48). American Cancer Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy405
61.
SandstromM. J. (2011). The power of popularity: Influence processes in childhood and adolescence. In CillessenA. H. N.SchwartzD.MayeuxL. (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 219–244). The Guilford Press.
62.
SchunckR. (2013). Within and between estimates in random-effects models: Advantages and drawbacks of correlated random effects and hybrid models. STATA Journal, 13(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1301300105
63.
SchwartzD.Hopmeyer GormanA. (2011). The high price of high status: Popularity as a mechanism of risk. In CillessenA. H. N.SchwartzD.MayeuxL. (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 245–270). The Guilford Press.
64.
SchwartzD.TomS. R.ChangL.XuY.DuongM. T.KellyB. M. (2010). Popularity and acceptance as distinct dimensions of social standing for Chinese children in Hong Kong. Social Development, 19(4), 681–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00558.x
65.
van den BergY. H. M.BurkW. J.CillessenA. H. N. (2015). Identifying subtypes of peer status by combining popularity and preference: A cohort-sequential approach. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(8), 1108–1137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614554704
66.
van den BergY. H. M.LansuT. A. M.CillessenA. H. N. (2020). Preference and popularity as distinct forms of status: A meta-analytic review of 20 years of research. Journal of Adolescence, 84(October 2020), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.07.010
67.
WaasdorpT. E.BakerC. N.PaskewichB. S.LeffS. S. (2013). The association between forms of aggression, leadership, and social status among urban youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(2), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9837-9
68.
WangS. S.HoushyarS.PrinsteinM. J. (2006). Adolescent girls’ and boys’ weight-related health behaviors and cognitions: Associations with reputation- and preference-based peer status (25, pp. 658–663). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.25.5.658
WiertsemaM.VrijenC.van der PloegR.SentseM.KretschmerT. (2023). Bullying perpetration and social status in the peer group: A meta-analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 95(1), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12109
71.
WilsonT. M.JamisonR. (2019). Perceptions of same-sex and cross-sex peers: Behavioral correlates of perceived coolness during middle childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 65(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.65.1.0001
72.
WilsonT. M.ZhaoJ. (2021). Coolness and admiration diverge in early adolescence among African American students in low-income urban schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000504
73.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2016). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cengage Learning.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
