Gender Differences in Math and Science Academic Self-Concepts and the Association With Female Climate in 8th Grade Classrooms

Abstract

Although women’s representation in STEM fields and occupations has increased, science and math continue to be stereotyped as male domains. This paper links psychological and sociological explanations for gendered disparities in STEM by examining the relationship between the local “micro-situational” female learning environment and the gender gap in academic self-concept in math and science. We applied hybrid models to TIMSS 2015 data comprised of a pseudo-panel of repeated measures for individual student and peer achievement, academic self-concept, utility value, and interest-enjoyment value in math/science (at age 14). We analyzed data from three countries, including a subsample of students who were taught by the same teacher in both math and science, thus eliminating unobserved teacher heterogeneity. Results indicate that female peer climate in the classroom is important for understanding how girls’ self-concept in math/science is formed, even though it was unrelated to the gender gap.

Keywords

academic self-concept gender gap STEM female peer climate trends in mathematics and science study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allison

P. D.

(2009). Fixed effects regression models In Quantitative applications in the social sciences (p. 160). Sage.

Andersen

I. G.

Reimer

(2019). Same-gender teacher assignment, instructional strategies, and student achievement: New evidence on the mechanisms generating same-gender teacher effects. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 62, 100406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2019.05.001

Anghel

Rodríguez-Planas

Sanz-de-Galdeano

(2020). Is the math gender gap associated with gender equality? Only in low-income countries. Economics of Education Review, 79, 102064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.102064

Archer

DeWitt

(2016). Understanding young people’s science aspirations: How students form ideas about “becoming a scientist. In Archer

DeWitt

(Eds.), Understanding young people’s science aspirations: How students form ideas about “becoming a scientist. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761077

Archer

Moote

Francis

DeWitt

Yeomans

(2017). The “exceptional” physics girl: A sociological analysis of multimethod data from young women aged 10–16 to explore gendered patterns of post-16 participation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 88–126. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216678379

Baker

D. P.

Jones

D. P.

(1993). Creating gender equality: Cross-national gender stratification and mathematical performance. Sociology of Education, 66(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112795

Bong

Skaalvik

E. M.

(2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021302408382

Bradley

(2000). The incorporation of women into higher education: Paradoxical outcomes? Sociology of Education, 73(1), 1–18v. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673196

Breda

Jouini

Napp

Thebault

(2020). Gender stereotypes can explain the gender-equality paradox. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(49), 31063–31069. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008704117

10.

Charles

Bradley

(2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. AJS; American Journal of Sociology, 114(4), 924–976. https://doi.org/10.1086/595942

11.

Correll

S. J.

(2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1691–1730. https://doi.org/10.1086/321299

12.

Correll

S. J.

(2004). Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review, 69(1), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900106

13.

Crosnoe

(2000). Friendships in childhood and adolescence: The life course and new directions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695847

14.

Cvencek

Meltzoff

A. N.

Greenwald

A. G.

(2011). Math-gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child Development, 82(3), 766–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01529.x

15.

Dahlbom

Jakobsson

Kotsadam

(2011). Gender and overconfidence: Are girls really overconfident? Applied Economics Letters, 18(4), 325–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851003670668

16.

Dee

(2007). Dee

T. S.

(2007). Teachers and the gender gaps in student achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 42(3), 528–554. https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:42:y:2007:i3:p528-554

17.

Eccles

(2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520902832368

18.

Eccles

J. S.

(1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x

19.

Eccles

J. S.

Wigfield

(1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295213003

20.

Eccles

J. S.

Wigfield

(2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859

21.

Ellis

Fosdick

B. K.

Rasmussen

(2016). Women 1.5 times more likely to leave stem pipeline after calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PLoS One, 11(7), e0157447. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157447

22.

Else-Quest

N. M.

Hyde

J. S.

Linn

M. C.

(2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018053

23.

Else-Quest

N. M.

Mineo

C. C.

Higgins

(2013). Math and science attitudes and achievement at the intersection of gender and ethnicity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313480694

24.

Festinger

(1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202

25.

Foy

Yin

(2016). Scaling the TIMSS 2015 achievement data. In Martin

M. O.

Mullis

I. V. S.

Hooper

(Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://timss.bc.edu/publications/timss/2015-methods/chapter-13.html

26.

Frank

K. A.

Muller

Schiller

K. S.

Riegle-crumb

Mueller

A. S.

Crosnoe

Pearson

(2008). The social dynamics of mathematics coursetaking in high school. AJS; American Journal of Sociology, 113(6), 1645–1696. https://doi.org/10.1086/587153

27.

Fryer

R. G.

Levitt

S. D.

(2010). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(2), 210–240. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.2.2.210

28.

Goldman

A. D.

Penner

A. M.

(2016). Exploring international gender differences in mathematics self-concept. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 21(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2013.847850

29.

Guiso

Monte

Sapienza

Zingales

(2008). Diversity. Culture, gender, and math. Science, 320(5880), 1164–1165. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154094

30.

Hägglund

A. E.

Leuze

(2021). Gender differences in STEM expectations across countries: How perceived labor market structures shape adolescents’ preferences. Journal of Youth Studies, 24(5), 634–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2020.1755029

31.

Hilts

Part

Bernacki

M. L.

(2018). The roles of social influences on student competence, relatedness, achievement, and retention in STEM. Science Education, 102(4), 744–770. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21449

32.

Hyde

J. S.

Fennema

Ryan

Frost

L. A.

Hopp

(1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect: A meta‐analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14(3), 299–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1990.tb00022.x

33.

Hyde

J. S.

Lindberg

S. M.

Linn

M. C.

Ellis

A. B.

Williams

C. C.

(2008). Diversity. Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321(5888), 494–495. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160364

34.

International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) (2013). TIMSS 2015 assessment frameworks. IEA.

35.

Jacobs

J. E.

Lanza

Osgood

D. W.

Eccles

J. S.

Wigfield

(2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73(2), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00421

36.

Jakobsson

Levin

Kotsadam

(2013). Gender and overconfidence: Effects of context, gendered stereotypes, and peer group. Advances in Applied Sociology, 3(2), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2013.32018

37.

Joncas

Foy

(2012). Sample design in TIMSS and PIRLS. Methods and procedures In TIMSS and PIRLS international study center. Lynch School of Education. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/methods/pdf/TP_Sampling_Design.pdf

38.

Kurtz-Costes

Copping

K. E.

Rowley

S. J.

Kinlaw

C. R.

(2014). Gender and age differences in awareness and endorsement of gender stereotypes about academic abilities. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(4), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0216-7

39.

Kurtz-Costes

Rowley

S. J.

Harris-Britt

Woods

T. A.

(2008). Gender stereotypes about mathematics and science and self-perceptions of ability in late childhood and early adolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 54(3), 386–409. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.0001

40.

Laukaityte

Wiberg

(2017). Using plausible values in secondary analysis in large-scale assessments. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 46(22), 11341–11357. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2016.1267764

41.

Lavy

(2012). Expanding school resources and increasing time on task: Effects of a policy experiment in Israel on student academic achievement and behavior (No. w18369). National Bureau of Economic Research.

42.

Legewie

DiPrete

T. A.

(2012). School context and the gender gap in educational achievement. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412440802

43.

Legewie

DiPrete

T. A.

(2014). The high school environment and the gender gap in science and engineering. Sociology of Education, 87(4), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040714547770

44.

Mann

DiPrete

(2016). The consequences of the national math and science performance environment for gender differences in STEM aspiration. Sociological Science, 3(25), 568–603. https://doi.org/10.15195/v3.a25

45.

Mann

Legewie

DiPrete

T. A.

(2015). The role of school performance in narrowing gender gaps in the formation of STEM aspirations: A cross-national study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00171

46.

Marsh

H. W.

Parker

J. W.

(1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don’t learn to swim as well? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(1), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.213

47.

Marsh

H. W.

Trautwein

Lüdtke

Köller

(2008). Social comparison and big-fish-little-pond effects on self-concept and other self-belief constructs: Role of generalized and specific others. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 510–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.510

48.

Martin

M. O.

Mullis

I. V. S.

Hooper

(2016). Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

49.

Martin

M. O.

Mullis

I. V. S.

Hooper

Yin

Foy

Palazzo

(2016). Creating and interpreting the TIMSS 2015 context questionnaire scales. In Martin

M. O.

Mullis

I. V. S.

Hooper

(Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015. https://timss.bc.edu/publications/timss/2015-methods/chapter-15.html

50.

Miller

D. I.

Eagly

A. H.

Linn

M. C.

(2015). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000005

51.

Mouganie

Wang

(2020). High-performing peers and female STEM choices in school. Journal of Labor Economics, 38(3), 805–841. https://doi.org/10.1086/706052

52.

Muntoni

Wagner

Retelsdorf

(2021). Beware of stereotypes: Are classmates’ stereotypes associated with students’ reading outcomes? Child Development, 92(1), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13359

53.

Nagy

Trautwein

Baumert

Köller

Garrett

(2006). Gender and course selection in upper secondary education: Effects of academic self-concept and intrinsic value. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600765687

54.

Nowicki

E. A.

Lopata

(2017). Children’s implicit and explicit gender stereotypes about mathematics and reading ability. Social Psychology of Education, 20(2), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9313-y

55.

O’Brien

R. M.

(2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6

56.

Parker

P. D.

Van Zanden

Parker

R. B.

(2018). Girls get smart, boys get smug: Historical changes in gender differences in math, literacy, and academic social comparison and achievement. Learning and Instruction, 54, 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.002

57.

Patall

E. A.

Steingut

R. R.

Freeman

J. L.

Pituch

K. A.

Vasquez

A. C.

(2018). Gender disparities in students’ motivational experiences in high school science classrooms. Science Education, 102(5), 951–977. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21461

58.

Penner

A. M.

(2008). Gender differences in extreme mathematical achievement: An international perspective on biological and social factors. AJS; American Journal of Sociology, 114(Suppl), S138–S170. https://doi.org/10.1086/589252

59.

Raabe

I. J.

Boda

Stadtfeld

(2019). The social pipeline: How friend influence and peer exposure widen the STEM gender gap. Sociology of Education, 92(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040718824095

60.

Retelsdorf

Schwartz

Asbrock

(2015). Michael can’t read!” teachers’ gender stereotypes and boys’ reading self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037107

61.

Ridgeway

C. L.

Correll

S. J.

(2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18(4), 510–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265269

62.

Riegle-Crumb

Farkas

Muller

(2006). The role of gender and friendship in advanced course taking. Sociology of Education, 79(3), 206–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070607900302

63.

Riegle-Crumb

Humphries

(2012). Exploring bias in math teachers’ perceptions of students’ ability by gender and race/ethnicity. Gender & Society, 26(2), 290–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211434614

64.

Riegle-Crumb

King

Grodsky

Muller

(2012). The more things change, the more they stay the same? Prior achievement fails to explain gender inequality in entry into STEM college majors over time. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1048–1073. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211435229

65.

Riegle-Crumb

Moore

(2014). The gender gap in high school physics: Considering the context of local communities. Social Science Quarterly, 95(1), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12022

66.

Riegle-Crumb

Morton

(2017). Gendered expectations: Examining how peers shape female students’ intent to pursue STEM fields. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 329. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00329

67.

Risman

B. J.

(2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society, 18(4), 429–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265349

68.

Robinson

J. P.

Lubienski

S. T.

(2011). The development of gender achievement gaps in mathematics and reading during elementary and middle school: Examining direct cognitive assessments and teacher ratings. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 268–302. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210372249

69.

Robnett

R. D.

(2016). Gender bias in STEM fields: Variation in prevalence and links to STEM self-concept. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315596162

70.

Rosenqvist

(2018). Two functions of peer influence on upper-secondary education application behavior. Sociology of Education, 91(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040717746113

71.

Rubin

D. B.

(1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in sample surveys. John Wiley.

72.

Rüschenpöhler

Markic

(2019). Self-concept research in science and technology education—theoretical foundation, measurement instruments, and main findings. Studies in Science Education, 55(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1645533

73.

Salikutluk

Heyne

(2017). Do gender roles and norms affect performance in maths? The impact of adolescents’ and their peers’ gender conceptions on maths grades. European Sociological Review, 33(3), 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcx049

74.

Sax

L. J.

Kanny

M. A.

Riggers-Piehl

T. A.

Whang

Paulson

L. N.

(2015). But I’m not good at math”: The changing salience of mathematical self-concept in shaping women’s and men’s STEM aspirations. Research in Higher Education, 56(8), 813–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9375-x

75.

Schøne

von Simson

Strøm

(2017). Girls helping girls—the impact of female peers on grades and educational choices. SSRN Electronic Journal, 10586. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2923672

76.

Schunck

(2013). Within and between estimates in random-effects models: Advantages and drawbacks of correlated random effects and hybrid models. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 13(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1301300105

77.

Schunck

Perales

(2017). Within- and between-cluster effects in generalized linear mixed models: A discussion of approaches and the xthybrid command. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 17(1), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1701700106

78.

Schwerdt

Wuppermann

A. C.

(2011). Is traditional teaching really all that bad? A within-student between-subject approach. Economics of Education Review, 30(2), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.11.005

79.

Sikora

Pokropek

(2012). Gender segregation of adolescent science career plans in 50 countries. Science Education, 96(2), 234–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20479

80.

Skaalvik

E. M.

(2004). Gender differences in math and verbal self-concept, performance expectations, and motivation. Sex Roles, 50(3/4), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:sers.0000015555.40976.e6

81.

Skinner

O. D.

Kurtz-Costes

Vuletich

Copping

Rowley

S. J.

(2021). Race differences in black and white adolescents’ academic gender stereotypes across middle and late adolescence. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 27(3), 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000384

82.

Stake

J. E.

Nickens

S. D.

(2005). Adolescent girls’ and boys’ science peer relationships and perceptions of the possible self as scientist. Sex Roles, 52(1-2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1189-4

83.

Stoet

Geary

D. C.

(2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719

84.

Suls

Martin

Wheeler

(2002). Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00191

85.

Thijs

Verkuyten

Helmond

(2010). A further examination of the big-fish-little-pond effect: Perceived position in class, class size, and gender comparisons. Sociology of Education, 83(4), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040710383521

86.

Trautwein

Möller

(2016). Self-Concept: Determinants and consequences of academic self-concept in school contexts. In Lipnevich

A. A.

Preckel

Roberts

R. D.

(Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century: Theory, research, and practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28606-8_8

87.

van der Vleuten

Steinmetz

van de Werfhorst

(2019). Gender norms and STEM: The importance of friends for stopping leakage from the STEM pipeline. Educational Research and Evaluation, 24(6-7), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2019.1589525

88.

Van Klaveren

(2011). Lecturing style teaching and student performance. Economics of Education Review, 30(4), 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.08.007

89.

Vinni-Laakso

Guo

Juuti

Loukomies

Lavonen

Salmela-Aro

(2019). The relations of science task values, self-concept of ability, and stem aspirations among Finnish students from first to second grade. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01449

90.

Wang

M.-T.

Degol

(2015). Math achievement is important, but task values are critical, too: Examining the intellectual and motivational factors leading to gender disparities in STEM careers. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00036

91.

Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

(2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015