This study examined whether adolescent students’ externalizing behavior and prosocial behavior affects their academic achievement (i.e., school grades and standardized test scores) in two major academic domains (i.e., mathematics and German) over and above well-established determinants of school achievement (i.e., prior achievement, intelligence, and domain-specific self-concepts). The study draws on longitudinal data from two independent samples of students (A/B) who were each followed from Grade 7 to Grade 9 (NA/B = 1143/1345). In each academic domain, structural equation models showed that externalizing behavior negatively predicted and prosocial behavior positively predicted academic achievement. When both behaviors were included simultaneously, prosocial behavior particularly predicted school grades in both domains, whereas externalizing behavior particularly predicted test scores in mathematics. Further analyses did not suggest differences between boys and girls in the effects of social behavior on academic achievement. Implications for future research and educational practice are discussed.
AchenbachT. M. (1991). Manual for the Teacher’s report form and 1991 profile. University of Vermont.
2.
AchenbachT. M.IvanovaM. Y.RescorlaL. A.TurnerL. V.AlthoffR. R. (2016). Internalizing/externalizing problems: Review and recommendations for clinical and research applications. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 55(8), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2016.05.012
3.
AdamsJ. W.SnowlingM. J.HennessyS. M.KindP. (1999). Problems of behaviour, reading and arithmetic: Assessments of comorbidity using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(4), 571–585. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709999157905
Arbeitsgruppe Deutsche Child Behavior Checklist (1993). Lehrerfragebogen über das Verhalten von Kindern und Jugendlichen; deutsche Bearbeitung der Teacher's Report Form der Child Behavior Checklist (TRF) [Teacher questionnaire about student behavior: German version of the Teacher’s Report Form of the Child Behavior Checklist (TRF)]. Arbeitsgruppe Kinder-, Jugend- und Familiendiagnostik (KJFD).
6.
ArendasyM. E.HergovichA.SommerM. (2008). Investigating the ‘g’-saturation of various stratum-two factors using automatic item generation. Intelligence, 36(6), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2007.11.005
7.
BatsonC. D.PowellA. A. (2003). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In WeinerI. B. (Ed), Handbook of psychology (5, pp. 463–484). Wiley.
8.
BechererJ.KöllerO.ZimmermannF. (2017). Sozialverhalten und Schulleistungen: Spielt die Beliebtheit in der Klasse eine Rolle? [social behavior and school achievement: Does peer acceptance play a role?]. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 20(3), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-017-0771-1
9.
BechererJ.KöllerO.ZimmermannF. (2021). Externalizing behaviour, task-focused behaviour, and academic achievement: An indirect relation?The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12347
10.
BurtS. A. (2012). How do we optimally conceptualize the heterogeneity within antisocial behavior? An argument for aggressive versus non-aggressive behavioral dimensions. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(4), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.02.006
11.
CapraraG. V.BarbaranelliC.PastorelliC.BanduraA.ZimbardoP. G. (2000). Prosocial foundations of children’s academic achievement. Psychological Science, 11(4), 302–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00260
12.
ChenC.LeeS.StevensonH. W. (1996). Long-term prediction of academic achievement of American, Chinese, and Japanese adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 750–759. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.88.4.750
13.
CoulombeB. R.YatesT. M. (2018). Prosocial pathways to positive adaptation: The mediating role of teacher-child closeness. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 58, 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.08.003
14.
CurleeA. S.AikenL. S.LutharS. S. (2019). Middle school peer reputation in high-achieving schools: Ramifications for maladjustment versus competence by age 18. Development and Psychopathology, 31(2), 683–697. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579418000275
15.
DeightonJ.HumphreyN.BelskyJ.BoehnkeJ.VostanisP.PatalayP. (2018). Longitudinal pathways between mental health difficulties and academic performance during middle childhood and early adolescence. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12218
16.
DeVriesJ. M.RathmannK.GebhardtM. (2018). How does social behavior relate to both grades and achievement scores?Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 857–858. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00857
17.
DoctoroffG. L.GreerJ. A.ArnoldD. H. (2006). The relationship between social behavior and emergent literacy among preschool boys and girls. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2005.12.003
18.
DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P.DymnickiA. B.TaylorR. D.SchellingerK. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
19.
EaglyA. H.WoodW.DiekmanA. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In EckesT.TrautnerH. M. (Eds), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
20.
EIKA. (2009). Projekt Entwicklung und Implementierung eines neuen Konzeptes zur Eingliederung Jugendlicher in die Berufs- und Arbeitswelt in Schulen mit erhöhtem Förderbedarf (EIKA) [development and implementation of a school-to-work transition concept for schools serving disadvantaged communities (EIKA)]. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg, Leibniz-Institut für die. Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik an der Universität Kiel.
21.
EisenbergN.MillerP. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91
22.
FinnJ. D.FishR. M.ScottL. A. (2008). Educational sequelae of high school misbehavior. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(5), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.101.5.259-274
23.
GanzeboomH. B. G.TreimanD. J. (1996). Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 international standard classification of occupations. Social Science Research, 25(3), 201–239. https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1996.0010
24.
GerbinoM.ZuffianòA.EisenbergN.CastellaniV.Luengo KanacriB. P.PastorelliC.CapraraG. V. (2018). Adolescents’ prosocial behavior predicts good grades beyond intelligence and personality traits. Journal of Personality, 86(2), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12309
25.
GoodmanR. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 38(5), 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x
26.
GuoQ.ZhouJ.FengL. (2018). Pro-social behavior is predictive of academic success via peer acceptance: A study of Chinese primary school children. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.010
27.
HalonenA.AunolaK.AhonenT.NurmiJ.-E. (2006). The role of learning to read in the development of problem behaviour: A cross-lagged longitudinal study. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(Pt 3), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X51590
28.
HattieJ. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
29.
HinshawS. P. (1992). Externalizing behavior problems and academic underachievement in childhood and adolescence: Causal relationships and underlying mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 127–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.127
30.
HuangC. (2011). Self-concept and academic achievement: A meta-analysis of longitudinal relations. Journal of School Psychology, 49(5), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.001
31.
JoptU. J. (1978). Selbstkonzept und Ursachenerklärung in der Schule [Self-concept and attribution in school. Kamp.
32.
KliemeE.ArteltC.HartigJ.JudeN.KöllerO.PrenzelM.SchneiderW.StanatP. (Eds), (2010). PISA 2009: Bilanz nach einem Jahrzehnt [PISA 2009: Review after one decade. Waxmann.
33.
KokkoK.TremblayR. E.LacourseE.NaginD. S.VitaroF. (2006). Trajectories of prosocial behavior and physical aggression in middle childhood: Links to adolescent school dropout and physical violence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16(3), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00500.x
34.
KrämerS.ZimmermannF. (2020). Zum Einfluss von störendem Schülerverhalten im Unterricht auf Leistungsbeurteilungen: Explizite Einschätzungen und experimentelle Befunde. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 34(2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000250
35.
KulkarniT.SullivanA. L.KimJ. (2021). Externalizing behavior problems and low academic achievement: Does a causal relation exist?Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 915–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09582-6
36.
LehmannR. H.GänsfußR.PeekR. (1999). And school learning among pupils in the city of Hamburg - grade 7]. Aspekte der Lernausgangslagen und der Lernentwicklung von Schülerinnen und Schülern an Hamburger Schulen - Klassenstufe 7. Hamburger Schulbehörde. [Components of initial achievement.
37.
LehmannR. H.PeekR.GänsfußR.HusfeldtV. (2002). Hamburger Schulbehörde. LAU 9: Aspekte der Lernausgangslage und der Lernentwicklung -Klassenstufe 9- [LAU 9: Components of initial achievement and school learning - Grade 9 -].
38.
LongobardiC.PrinoL. E.MarengoD.SettanniM. (2016). Student-teacher relationships as a protective factor for school adjustment during the transition from middle to high school. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1988–1989. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01988
39.
LovelandJ. M.LounsburyJ. W.WelshD.BuboltzW. C. (2007). The validity of physical aggression in predicting adolescent academic performance. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(Pt 1), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X79563
40.
McMahonR. J. (1994). Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of externalizing problems in children: The role of longitudinal data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(5), 901–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.62.5.901
41.
MetsäpeltoR. L.PakarinenE.KiuruN.PoikkeusA. M.LerkkanenM. K.NurmiJ. E. (2015). Developmental dynamics between children’s externalizing problems, task-avoidant behavior, and academic performance in early school years: A 4-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037389
42.
MeyerJ.FleckensteinJ.RetelsdorfJ.KöllerO. (2019). The relationship of personality traits and different measures of domain-specific achievement in upper secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.005
43.
MoilanenK. L.ShawD. S.MaxwellK. L. (2010). Developmental cascades: Externalizing, internalizing, and academic competence from middle childhood to early adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 22(3), 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000337
44.
MontroyJ. J.BowlesR. P.SkibbeL. E.FosterT. D. (2014). Social skills and problem behaviors as mediators of the relationship between behavioral self-regulation and academic achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(3), 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.03.002
45.
MurisP.MeestersC.van den BergF. (2003). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): Further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of dutch children and adolescents. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 12(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-003-0298-2
46.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus (version 8. Muthén and Muthén.
47.
NoftleE. E.RobinsR. W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.116
48.
NurmiJ. E. (2012). Students’ characteristics and teacher–child relationships in instruction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.03.001
49.
OberleE.JiX. R.MolyneuxT. M. (2022). Pathways from prosocial behaviour to emotional health and academic achievement in early adolescence. The Journal of early adolescence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316221113349
50.
OECD (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework – mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills.
51.
OkanoL.JeonL.CrandallA.PowellT.RileyA. (2020). The cascading effects of externalizing behaviors and academic achievement across developmental transitions: Implications for prevention and intervention. Prevention Science: The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 21(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01055-9
52.
OrpwoodG.GardenR. A. (1998). Assessing mathematics and science literacy In: TIMSS monograph no 4). Pacific Educational Press.
53.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarloG. (2014). The study of prosocial behavior: Past, present, and future. In Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarloG. (Eds), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach (pp. 3–16). Oxford University Press.
54.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.Memmott-ElisonM. K.CoyneS. M. (2018). Associations between prosocial and problem behavior from early to late adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5), 961–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0736-y
55.
RomanoE.BabchishinL.PaganiL. S.KohenD. (2010). School readiness and later achievement: Replication and extension using a nationwide Canadian survey. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 995–1007. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018880
56.
RoordaD. L.JakS.ZeeM.OortF. J.KoomenH. M. Y. (2017). Affective teacher-student relationships and students’ engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement. School Psychology Review, 46(3), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0035.V46-3
57.
RothB.BeckerN.RomeykeS.SchäferS.DomnickF.SpinathF. M. (2015). Intelligence and school grades: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 53, 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.002
58.
SchröderL.SeehagenS.ZmyjN.HebebrandJ. (2016). Wie du mir, so ich dir? Die Entwicklung von prosozialem Verhalten und der Zusammenhang mit externalisierenden und internalisierenden Auffälligkeiten [“Tit for tat?” The development of prosocial behavior and its relationship to externalizing and internalizing problems]. Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 44(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1024/1422-4917/a000396.
59.
SpinathB.Harald FreudenthalerH.NeubauerA. C. (2010). Domain-specific school achievement in boys and girls as predicted by intelligence, personality and motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.028
60.
SpinathB.SpinathF. M.HarlaarN.PlominR. (2006). Predicting school achievement from general cognitive ability, self-perceived ability, and intrinsic value. Intelligence, 34(4), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.11.004
61.
StangerC.AchenbachT. M.VerhulstF. C. (1997). Accelerated longitudinal comparisons of aggressive versus delinquent syndromes. Development and Psychopathology, 9(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579497001053
62.
StanovichK. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.21.4.1
63.
ThorndikeE. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071663
64.
TremblayR. E.VitaroF.GagnonC.PichéC.RoyerN. (1992). A prosocial scale for the preschool behaviour questionnaire: Concurrent and predictive correlates. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 15(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502549201500204
65.
van der EndeJ.VerhulstF. C.TiemeierH. (2016). The bidirectional pathways between internalizing and externalizing problems and academic performance from 6 to 18 years. Development and Psychopathology, 28(3), 855–867. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579416000353
66.
van LierP. A. C.KootH. M. (2010). Developmental cascades of peer relations and symptoms of externalizing and internalizing problems from kindergarten to fourth-grade elementary school. Development and Psychopathology, 22(3), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000283
67.
van LierP. A. C.VitaroF.BarkerE. D.KootH. M.TremblayR. E. (2009). Developmental links between trajectories of physical violence, vandalism, theft, and alcohol-drug use from childhood to adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(4), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9289-6
68.
VannattaK.GartsteinM. A.ZellerM.NollR. B. (2009). Peer acceptance and social behavior during childhood and adolescence: How important are appearance, athleticism, and academic competence?International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(4), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025408101275
69.
VeenstraR.LindenbergS.OldehinkelA. J.De WinterA. F.VerhulstF. C.OrmelJ. (2008). Prosocial and antisocial behavior in preadolescence: Teachers’ and parents’ perceptions of the behavior of girls and boys. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(3), 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025408089274
70.
VinnickL. A.EricksonM. T. (1992). Relationships among accumulated lifetime life events, prosocial skills, and behavior problems in elementary school children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01321282
71.
WeißR. H. (1998). CFT 20: Grundintelligenztest Skala 2 [CFT 20: General intelligence test scale 2 (4th ed.). Hogrefe.
72.
WentzelK. R. (1993). Does being good make the grade? Social behavior and academic competence in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.357
73.
WentzelK. R. (2005). Peer relationships, motivation, and academic performance at school. In ElliottA. J.DweckC. S. (Eds), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 279–296). Guilford Publications.
74.
WentzelK. R.CaldwellK. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68(6), 1198–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01994.x
75.
WeynsT.ColpinH.De LaetS.EngelsM.VerschuerenK. (2018). Teacher support, peer acceptance, and engagement in the classroom: A three-wave longitudinal study in late childhood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(6), 1139–1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0774-5
76.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
77.
WuM. L.AdamsR. J.WilsonM. (1998). ConQuest: Generalized item response modeling software [computer software]. Australian Council for Educational Research.
78.
ZhangW.ZhangL.ChenL.JiL.Deater-DeckardK. (2019). Developmental changes in longitudinal associations between academic achievement and psychopathological symptoms from late childhood to middle adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 60(2), 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12927
79.
ZimmermannF.SchütteK.TaskinenP.KöllerO. (2013). Reciprocal effects between adolescent externalizing problems and measures of achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 747–761. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032793
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
