We illustrate how early adolescents use different patterns of ability feedback to promote a positive self-concept of ability (SCA) in mathematics. Students can simultaneously use ability appraisals from parents and teachers, while also drawing information from peer, dimensional, and temporal comparisons. Although we find these five sources are equally important for promoting students’ positive SCA, on average, we use a pattern-centered approach to show that students who believe they are good at math often select certain feedback sources as more important to develop this belief. We find that students’ patterns of ability feedback are unstable, with evidence suggesting different patterns may emerge depending on the availability of ability feedback. Findings suggest early adolescents attempting to promote their own positive SCA in mathematics may know to seek different feedback sources depending on their individual circumstances. Implications are discussed through the lens of social comparison theory.
AguilarS. J. (2018). Examining the relationship between comparative and self-focused academic data visualizations in at-risk college students’ academic motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50, 84-103. doi:10.1080/15391523.2017.1401498
2.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
3.
BergmanL. R.MagnussonD.El-KhouriB. M. (2003). Studying individual development in an interindividual context: A person-oriented approach (Vol. 1). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
BongM. (2008). Effects of parent-child relationships and classroom goal structures on motivation, help-seeking avoidance, and cheating. Journal of Experimental Education, 76, 191-217. doi:10.3200/JEXE.76.2.191-217
5.
BongM.ClarkR. E. (2010). Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 34, 139-153. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_1
6.
BongM.SkaalvikE. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really?Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1-40. doi:10.1023/A:1021302408382
7.
BurnettP. C.CravenR. G.MarshH. W. (1999, November27-December2). Enhancing students’ self-concepts and related constructs: A critical longitudinal analysis capitalising on and combining promising enhancement techniques for educational settings. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE), Australian Association for Research in Education (NZARE) Conference, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
8.
ChmielewskiA. K.DumontH.TrautweinU. (2013). Tracking effects depend on tracking type: An international comparison of students’ mathematics self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 925-957. doi:10.3102/0002831213489843
9.
ConleyA. M. (2012). Patterns of motivation beliefs: Combining achievement goal and expectancy-value perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 32-47. doi:10.1037/a0026042
10.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
11.
EcclesJ. S. (1993). School and family effects on the ontogeny of children’s interests, self-perceptions, and activity choices. In JacobsJ. E. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: 1992—Developmental perspectives on motivation (pp. 145-208). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
12.
EcclesJ. S.AdlerT. F.FuttermanR.GoffS. B.KaczalaC. M.MeeceJ. L.MidgleyC. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behavior. In SpenceJ. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
13.
EcclesJ. S.BarberB. L.UpdegraffK.O’BrienK. M. (1998). An expectancy-value model of achievement choices: The role of ability self-concepts, perceived task utility and interest in predicting activity choice and course enrollment. In HoffmannA. K. L.RenningerK. A.BaumertJ. (Eds.), Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 267-280). Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel.
14.
EcclesJ. S.MidgleyC. (1989). Stage-environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In AmesC.AmesR. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Goals and cognitions (Vol. 3., pp. 13-44). New York, NY: Academic Press.
15.
ElliotA. J.MapesR. R. (2005). Approach-avoidance motivation and self-concept evaluation. In TesserA.WoodJ. B.StapelD. A. (Eds.), On building, defending, and regulating the self: A psychological perspective (pp. 171-196). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
16.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202
17.
GniewoszB.EcclesJ. S.NoackP. (2011). Secondary school transition and the use of different sources of information for the construction of the academic self-concept. Social Development, 21, 537-557. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00635.x
18.
GreenJ.SedikidesC. (2004). Retrieval selectivity in the processing of self-referent information: Testing the boundaries of self-protection. Self and Identity, 3, 69-80. doi:10.1080/13576500342000059a
19.
GuayF.RatelleC. F.RoyA.LitalienD. (2010). Academic self-concept, autonomous academic motivation, and academic achievement: Mediating and additive effects. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 644-653. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.08.001
20.
GuoJ.MarshH. W.MorinA. J. S.ParkerP. D.KaurG. (2015). Directionality of the associations of high school expectancy-value, aspirations, and attainment: A longitudinal study. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 371-402. doi:10.3102/0002831214565786
21.
HarterS. (1998). The development of self-representations. In DamonW.EisenbergN. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional and personality development (Vol. 3., 5th ed., pp. 553-617). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
22.
HarterS. (2012). The construction of the self (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
HattieJ. A. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
JansenM.SchroedersU.LüdtkeO.MarshH. W. (2015). Contrast and assimilation effects of dimensional comparisons in five subjects: An extension of the I/E model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 1086-1101. doi:10.1037/edu0000021
25.
KaminskiD. M.EricksonE. L.RossM.BradfieldL. (1976, August30-September3). Why females don’t like mathematics: The effect of parental expectations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York, NY.
26.
MarshH. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129-149. doi:10.3102/00028312023001129
27.
MarshH. W.AbduljabbarA. S.ParkerP. D.MorinA. J. S.AbdelfattahF.NagengastB.Abu-HilalM. M. (2015). The internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept and achievement relations: Age-cohort and cross-cultural differences. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 168-202. doi:10.3102/0002831214549453
28.
MarshH. W.KuyperH.SeatonM.ParkerP. D.MorinA. J. S.MöllerJ.AbduljabbarA. S. (2014). Dimensional comparison theory: An extension of the internal/external frame of reference effect on academic self-concept formation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 326-341. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.003
29.
MarshH. W.LudtkeO.NagengastBTrautweineU.SalahA.FaisalA.JansendA. M. (2015). Dimensional Comparison Theory: Paradoxical relations between self-beliefs and achievements in multiple domains. Learning and Instruction, 35, 16-32. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.005
30.
MarshH. W.MartinA. J.YeungA. S.CravenR. G. (2017). Competence self-perceptions. In ElliotAndrew J.DweckC. S.YeagerD. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (2nd ed., pp. 85-115). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
31.
MarshH. W.ParkerJ. W. (1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don’t learn to swim as well?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 213-231. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.213
32.
McLachlanG. J. (2011). Commentary on Steinley and Brusco (2011): Recommendations and cautions. Psychological Methods, 16, 80-81. doi:10.1037/a0021141
33.
MidgleyC.FeldlauferH.EcclesJ. S. (1989a). Change in teacher efficacy and student self- and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 247-258. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.247
34.
MidgleyC.FeldlauferH.EcclesJ. S. (1989b). Student/teacher relations and attitudes toward mathematics before and after the transition to junior high school. Child Development, 60, 981-992. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1131038
35.
MöllerJ. (2005). Paradoxical effects of praise and criticism: Social, dimensional and temporal comparisons. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 275-295. doi:10.1348/000709904X24744
MollerJ.RetelsdorfJ.KollerO.MarshH. W. (2011). The reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model: An integration of models of relations between academic achievement and self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1315-1346. doi:10.3102/0002831211419649
38.
MurayamaK.ElliotA. J.FriedmanR. (2012). Achievement goals and approach-avoidance motivation. In RyanR. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 191-207). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39.
Musu-GilletteL. E.WigfieldA.HarringJ. R.EcclesJ. S. (2015). Trajectories of change in students’ self-concepts of ability and values in math and college major choice. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21, 343-370. doi:10.1080/13803611.2015.1057161
40.
NagyG.TrautweinU.BaumertJ.KöllerO.GarrettJ. (2006). Gender and course selection in upper secondary education: Effects of academic self-concept and intrinsic value. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 323-345. doi:10.1080/13803610600765687
41.
NeuenschwanderM. P.VidaM.GarrettJ. L.EcclesJ. S. (2007). Parents’ expectations and students’ achievement in two western nations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 474-482. doi:10.1177/0165025407080589
42.
NichollsJ. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/rev/91/3/328/
43.
O’MaraA. J.MarshH. W.CravenR. G.DebusR. L. (2006). Do self-concept interventions make a difference? A synergistic blend of construct validation and meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 41, 181-206. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4103_4
44.
RobinsonK. A.RanellucciJ.LeeY.WormingtonS. V.RosethC. J.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (2017). Affective profiles and academic success in a college science course. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 209-221. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.08.004
45.
RosenbergM. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York, NY: Basic Books.
46.
SedikidesC. (1993). Personnality processes and individual differences assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 317-338.
47.
SedikidesC.SkowronskiJ. J.GaertnerL. (2004). Self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: From the laboratory to an evolutionary context. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 2, 61-79.
48.
ShavelsonR. J.HubnerJ. J.StantonG. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441. doi:10.3102/00346543046003407
49.
SimpkinsS. D.FredricksJ. A.EcclesJ. S. (2012). Charting the Eccles’ expectancy-value model from mothers’ beliefs in childhood to youths’ activities in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1019-1032. doi:10.1037/a0027468
50.
SkipperY.DouglasK. (2015). The influence of teacher feedback on children’s perceptions of student-teacher relationships. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 276-288. doi:10.1111/bjep.12070
51.
SpinathB.SpinathF. M. (2005). Development of self-perceived ability in elementary school: The role of parents’ perceptions, teacher evaluations, and intelligence. Cognitive Development, 20, 190-204. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.01.001
52.
SteinleyD.BruscoM. J. (2011a). Evaluating mixture modeling for clustering: Recommendations and cautions. Psychological Methods, 16, 63-79. doi:10.1037/a0022673
53.
SteinleyD.BruscoM. J. (2011b). K-means clustering and mixture model clustering: Reply to McLachlan (2011) and Vermunt (2011). Psychological Methods, 16, 89-92. doi:10.1037/a0022679
54.
TiedemannJ. (2000). Parents’ gender stereotypes and teachers’ beliefs as predictors of children’s concept of their mathematical ability in elementary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 144-151. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.144
55.
UmarjiO.McPartlanP.EcclesJ. (2018). Patterns of Math and English self-concepts as motivation for college major selection. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 146-158. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.03.004
56.
UpdegraffK. A.EcclesJ. S.BarberB. L.O’BrienK. M. (1996). Course enrollment as self-regulatory behavior: Who takes optional high school math courses?Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 239-259.
57.
VarghaA.TormaB.BergmanL. R. (2015). ROPstat: A general statistical package useful for conducting person-oriented analysis. Journal for Person-Oriented Research, 1, 87-98. doi:10.17505/jpor.2015.09
58.
VermuntJ. K. (2011). K-means may perform as well as mixture model clustering but may also be much worse: Comment on Steinley and Brusco (2011). Psychological Methods, 16, 82-88. doi:10.1037/a0020144
59.
von EyeA.Gutiérrez PeñaE. (2004). Configural frequency analysis: The search for extreme cells. Journal of Applied Statistics, 31, 981-997. doi:10.1080/0266476042000270545
60.
von EyeA.MairP.MunE.-Y. (2010). Advances in configural frequency analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
61.
WagnerB. M.PhillipsD. A. (1992). Beyond beliefs: Parent and child behaviors and children’s perceived academic competence. Child Development, 63, 1380-1391. doi:10.2307/1131563
62.
WolffF.HelmF.MöllerJ. (2018). Testing the dimensional comparison theory: When do students prefer dimensional comparisons to social and temporal comparisons?Social Psychology of Education, 21, 875-895. doi:10.1007/s11218-018-9441-2
63.
WormingtonS. V.CorpusJ. H.AndersonK. G. (2012). A person-centered investigation of academic motivation and its correlates in high school. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 429-438. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.004
64.
WormingtonS. V.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (2016). A new look at multiple goal pursuit: The promise of a person-centered approach. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 407-445. doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9358-2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
