Employing a social capital framework, this study investigates teachers’ role in influencing the peer dynamics between English learners (ELs) and their non-EL peers. Participants include 713 students (211 EL students). Observed teacher-student interaction quality and teacher self-reports of their peer network management were used to operationalize the teacher-directed, classroom-level factors. Peer nominations of friendships within the classroom were used to operationalize students’ same-language-status (bonding capital) and cross-language-status (bridging capital) friendships. Multilevel models reveal teachers’ reported practices and observed interaction quality account for a small proportion of the variance in students’ bridging and bonding relationships at the classroom level overall, but with differential effects for EL and non-EL students. For example, in classrooms with greater reported use of bonding practices, EL students reported more bonding and fewer bridging friendships in the fall, and showed relatively less fall-to-spring growth in bridging friendships. Implications for future research and teacher training are discussed.
AhnH. J.RodkinP. C.GestS. (2013). Teacher–student agreement on “bullies and kids they pick on” in elementary school classrooms: Gender and grade differences. Theory Into Practice, 52, 257-263. doi:10.1080/00405841.2013.829728
2.
Audley-PiotrowskiS.SingerA.PattersonM. (2015). The role of the teacher in children’s peer relations: Making the invisible hand intentional. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1, 192-200. doi:10.1037/tps0000038
3.
BlakemoreS. J.MillsK. L. (2014). Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing?Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 187-207.
4.
BodnerT. E. (2017). Standardized effect sizes for moderated conditional fixed effects with continuous moderator variables. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 562.
5.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). Contexts of child rearing: Problems and prospects. American Psychologist, 34(10), 844-850.
6.
BrownB. B.LarsonJ. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In LernerR. M.SteinbergL. (Eds). Handbook of adolescent psychology (Vol. 2). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
7.
CappellaE.HughesD. L.McCormickM. P. (2017). The hidden role of teachers: Child and classroom predictors of change in interracial friendships. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 37, 1093-1124.
8.
Carhill-PozaA. (2015). Opportunities and outcomes: The role of peers in developing the oral academic English proficiency of adolescent English learners. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 678-695. doi:10.1111/modl.12271
9.
ChangL. (2003). Variable effects of children’s aggression, social withdrawal, and prosocial leadership as functions of teacher beliefs and behaviors. Child Development, 74, 535-548.
10.
CohenJ. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 98-101.
11.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple correlation/ regression analysis for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
DelgadoM. Y.EttekalA. V.SimpkinsS. D.SchaeferD. R. (2016). How do my friends matter? Examining Latino adolescents’ friendships, school belonging, and academic achievement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 1110-1125. doi:10.1007/s10964-015-0341-x
13.
DownerJ. T.LópezM. L.GrimmK. J.HamagamiA.PiantaR. C.HowesC. (2012). Observations of teacher–child interactions in classrooms serving Latinos and dual language learners: Applicability of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System in diverse settings. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 21-32. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.07.005
14.
FarmerT. W.ChenC.-C.HammJ. V.MoatesM. M.MehtajiM.LeeD.HunekeM. R. (2016). Supporting teachers’ management of middle school social dynamics: The scouting report process. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52, 67-76.
15.
FarmerT. W.McAuliffe LinesM.HammJ. V. (2011). Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children’s peer experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 247-256. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2011.04.006
16.
GarcíaO.BartlettL. (2007). A speech community model of bilingual education: Educating Latino newcomers in the USA. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 1-25. doi:10.2167/beb364.0
17.
GestS. D. (2006). Teacher reports of children’s friendships and social groups: Agreement with peer reports and implications for studying peer similarity. Social Development, 15, 248-259.
18.
GestS. D.MadillR. A.ZadzoraK. M.MillerA. M.RodkinP. C. (2014) Teacher management of elementary classroom social dynamics: Associations with chagnes in student adjustment. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22(3), 107-118.
19.
GestS. D.OsgoodD. W.FeinbergM. E.BiermanK. L.MoodyJ. (2011). Strengthening prevention program theories and evaluations: Contributions from social network analysis. Prevention Science, 12, 349-360. doi:10.1007/s11121-011-0229-2
20.
GestS. D.RodkinP. C. (2011). Teaching practices and elementary classroom peer ecologies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 288-296. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2011.02.004
21.
Gifford-SmithM. E.BrownellC. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 235-284. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(03)00048-7
22.
GrahamS.MunniksmaA.JuvonenJ. (2014). Psychosocial benefits of cross-ethnic friendships in urban middle schools. Child Development, 85, 469-483. doi:10.1111/cdev.12159
23.
HammJ. V.Bradford BrownB.HeckD. J. (2005). Bridging the ethnic divide: Student and school characteristics in African American, Asian-Descent, Latino, and White adolescents’ cross-ethnic friend nominations. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 21-46.
24.
HanedaM.WellsG. (2008). Learning an additional language through dialogic inquiry. Language and Education, 22, 114-136. doi:10.2167/le730.0
25.
HartupW. W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67, 1-13. doi:10.2307/1131681
26.
HektnerJ. M.SwensonC. A. (2012). Links from teacher beliefs to peer victimization and bystander intervention: Tests of mediating processes. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 32, 516-536. doi:10.1177/0272431611402502
27.
KawabataY.CrickN. R. (2015). Direct and interactive links between cross-ethnic friendships and peer rejection, internalizing symptoms, and academic engagement among ethnically diverse children. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21, 191-200. doi:10.1037/a0038451
28.
KiblerA. K.Molloy ElredaL.HemmlerV. L.ArbeitM.R.BeesonJohnsonH.E. (2019) Building linguistically integrated classroom communities: The Role of teacher practices. American Educational Research Journal, 56, 3, 676-715. doi: 10.3102/0002831218803872.
29.
Kochenderfer-LaddB.PelletierM. E. (2008). Teachers’ views and beliefs about bullying: Influences on classroom management strategies and students’ coping with peer victimization. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 431-453. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.07.005
30.
LazoD.HendersonL.DickersonK.JohnsonH. E.WilliamsJ. L. (2018, April). “You can hear them talking about you”: The role of language in middle school friendships. Paper presented at Society for Research on Adolescence Biennial meeting, Minneapolis, MN.
31.
LucknerA. E.PiantaR. C. (2011). Teacher–student interactions in fifth grade classrooms: Relations with children’s peer behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 257-266. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2011.02.010
32.
MashburnA. J.PiantaR. C.HamreB. K.DownerJ. T.BarbarinO. A.BryantD.. . .HowesC. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79, 732-749.
33.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
34.
MikamiA. Y.GregoryA.AllenJ. P.PiantaR. C.LunJ. (2011). Effects of a teacher professional development intervention on peer relationships in secondary classrooms. School Psychology Review, 40, 367-385.
35.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
PiantaR. C.la ParoK. M.PayneC.CoxM. J.BradleyR. (2002). The relation of kindergarten classroom environment to teacher, family, and school characteristics and child outcomes. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 225-238.
38.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
SaundersW. M.MarcellettiD. J. (2013). The gap that can’t go away: The catch-22 of reclassification in monitoring the progress of English learners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35, 139-156. doi:10.3102/0162373712461849
40.
SelyaA. S.RoseJ. S.DierkerL. C.HedekerD.MermelsteinR. J. (2012). A practical guide to calculating Cohen’s f2, a measure of local effect size, from PROC MIXED. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 111.
41.
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (2004). Social capital among working-class minority students. In GibsonM. A.GandaraP. C.KoyamaJ. P. (Eds.), School connections: U.S. Mexican youth, peers, and school achievement (pp. 18-28). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
42.
TsengV.SeidmanE. (2007). A systems framework for understanding social settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 217-228. doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9101-8
43.
ValdésG. (2004). The teaching of academic language to minority send language learners. In BallA. F.WarshauerS. (Eds.), Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning (pp. 66-198). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
WilliamsJ. (2001). Classroom conversations: Opportunities to learn for ESL students in mainstream classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 54, 750-757.
45.
WoolleyM. E.KolK. L.BowenG. L. (2009). The Social context of school success for Latino middle school students: Direct and indirect influences of teachers, family, and friends. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 29, 43-70. doi:10.1177/0272431608324478
46.
ZengZ.XieY. (2008). A preference-opportunity-choice framework with applications to intergroup friendship. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 615-648.
