Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-6
Beliefs About Fighting and Their Relations to Urban Adolescents’ Frequency of Aggression and Victimization: Evaluation of the Beliefs About Fighting Scale
This study investigated the structure and concurrent validity of the Beliefs About Fighting Scale (BAFS). Participants were 2,118 students from three urban middle schools who completed measures of their beliefs, frequency of physical aggression, victimization, and nonviolent intentions. Ratings of students’ frequency of physical aggression, physical victimization, and nonviolent behavior were also obtained from their teachers. The majority of the sample was African American (81%). Confirmatory factor analyses supported a model with separate factors representing beliefs against fighting, beliefs that fighting is sometimes necessary, beliefs supporting reactive aggression, and beliefs supporting proactive aggression. Support was also found for strong measurement invariance across sex, grade, and groups that differed in whether a violence-prevention program was being implemented at their school. The four BAFS factors were associated with adolescents’ frequency of aggression, victimization, and nonviolent behavior. This study underscores the importance of assessing multiple aspects of beliefs associated with aggressive behavior.
BellmoreA. D.WitkowM. R.GrahamS.JuvonenJ. (2005). From beliefs to behavior: The mediating role of hostile response selection in predicting aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 31, 453-472. doi:10.1002/ab.20094
3.
BettencourtA. F.FarrellA. D. (2013). Individual and contextual factors associated with patterns of aggression and peer victimization during middle school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 285-302. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9854-8
4.
BoxerP.DubowE. F. (2002). A social-cognitive information-processing model for school-based aggression reduction and prevention programs: Issues for research and practice. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 10, 177-192. doi:10.5993/AJHB.24.4.3
5.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BorwnT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.
7.
CardN. A.LittleT. D. (2006). Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 466-480. doi:10.1177/0165025406071904
8.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
9.
Copeland-LinderN.JonesV. C.HaynieD. L.Simons-MortonB.WrightJ. L.ChengT. L. (2007). Factors associated with retaliatory attitudes among African American adolescents who have been assaulted. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32, 760-770. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsm007
10.
CraigW.PeplerD.ConnollyJ.HendersonK. (2001). Developmental context of peer harassment in early adolescence. In JuvonenJ.GrahamS. (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 242-261). New York, NY: Guilford.
11.
CrickJ. R.DodgeK. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74-101. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74
12.
FarrellA. D.BettencourtA. F. (2018). Adolescents’ appraisal of responses to problem situations and their relation to aggression and nonviolent behavior. Manuscript in preparation.
13.
FarrellA. D.BettencourtA.MaysS.KramerA.SullivanT.KliewerW. (2012). Patterns of adolescents’ beliefs about fighting and their relation to behavior and risk factors for aggression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 787-802. doi:10.1007/s10802-011-9609-0
14.
FarrellA. D.ErwinE. H.BettencourtA.MaysS.Vulin-ReynoldsM.SullivanT.. . . MeyerA. (2008). Individual factors influencing effective nonviolent behavior and fighting in peer situations: A qualitative study with urban African American adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37, 397-411. doi:10.1080/15374410801955821
15.
FarrellA. D.GoncyE. A.SullivanT. N.ThompsonE. L. (2018). Evaluation of the Problem Behavior Frequency Scale–Teacher Report form for assessing behavior in a sample of urban adolescents. Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/pas0000571
16.
FarrellA. D.MaysS.BettencourtA.ErwinE. H.Vulin-ReynoldsM.AllisonK. W. (2010). Environmental influences on fighting versus nonviolent behavior in peer situations: A qualitative study with urban African American adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 19-35. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9331-z
17.
FarrellA. D.MehariK. R.Kramer-KuhnA. M.MaysS. A.SullivanT. N. (2015). A qualitative analysis of factors influencing middle school students’ use of skills taught by a violence prevention curriculum. Journal of School Psychology, 53, 179-194. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2015.03.001
18.
FarrellA. D.SullivanT. N.GoncyE. A.LeA. H. (2016). Assessment of adolescents’ victimization, aggression, and problem behaviors: Evaluation of the Problem Behavior Frequency Scale. Psychological Assessment, 28, 702-714. doi:10.1037/pas0000225
19.
FarrellA. D.SullivanT. N.SutherlandK. S.CoronaR.MashoS. (2018). Evaluation of the Olweus Bully Prevention Program in an urban school system in the USA. Prevention Science, 19, 833-847. doi:10.1007/s11121-018-0923-4
20.
FarrellA. D.ThompsonE. L.MehariK. R.SullivanT. N.GoncyE. A. (in press). Assessment of in-person and cyber aggression and victimization, substance use, and delinquent behavior during early adolescence. Assessment. doi: 10.1177/1073191118792089
21.
FarrellA. D.Vulin-ReynoldsM. (2007). Violent behavior and the science of prevention. In FlanneryD. J.VazsonyiA. T.WaldmanI. D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of violent behavior and aggression (pp. 767-786). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511816840.041
22.
FelixE. D.McMahonS. D. (2007). The role of gender in peer victimization among youth. Journal of School Violence, 6, 27-44. doi:10.1300/J202v06n03_03
23.
FiteP. J.RaineA.Stouthamer-LoeberM.LoeberR.PardiniD. A. (2010). Reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent males: Examining differential outcomes 10 years later in early adulthood. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 141-157. doi:10.1177/0093854809353051
24.
GoodboyA. K.KlineR. B. (2017). Statistical and practical concerns with published communication research featuring structural equation modeling. Communication Research Reports, 34, 68-77. doi:10.1080/08824096.2016.1214121
25.
GrahamJ. W.TaylorB. J.CumsilleP. E. (2001). Planned missing data designs in the analysis of change. In CollinsL. M.SayerA. G. (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 335-353). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10409-011
HenryD. B.FarrellA. D.SchoenyM. E.TolanP. H.DymnickiA. B. (2011). Influence of school-level variables on aggression and associated attitudes of middle school students. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 481-503. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04.007
28.
HenryD. B.GuerraN.HuesmannR.TolanP.VanAckerR.EronL. (2000). Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 59-81. doi:10.1023/A:1005142429725
29.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
30.
HuangF. L.CornellD. G.KonoldT. R. (2015). Aggressive attitudes in middle schools: A factor structure and criterion-related validity study. Assessment, 22, 497-512. doi:10.1177/1073191114551016
31.
HuesmannL. R. (1998). The role of social information processing and cognitive schema in the acquisition and maintenance of habitual aggressive behavior. In GeenR. G.DonnersteinE. (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research, and implications for social policy (pp. 73-109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012278805-5/50005-5
32.
HuesmannL. R.EronL. D.DubowE. F. (2002). Childhood predictors of adult criminality: Are all risk factors reflected in childhood aggressiveness?Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 12, 185-208. doi:10.1002/cbm.496
33.
HuesmannL. R.GuerraN. G. (1997). Children’s normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 408-419. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.408
34.
MarshH. W.MuthénB.AsparouhovT.LüdtkeO.RobitzschA.MorinA. J. S.TrautweinU. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 439-476. doi:10.1080/10705510903008220
35.
Miller-JohnsonS.MooreB. L.UnderwoodM. K.CoieJ. D. (2005). African-American girls and physical aggression: Does stability of childhood aggression predict later negative outcomes? In PeplerD. J.MadsenK. C.WebsterC.LeveneK. S. (Eds.), The development and treatment of girlhood aggression (pp. 75-95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
MoffittT. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674
NanselT. R.HaynieD. L.Simons-MortonB. G. (2003). The association of bullying and victimization with middle school adjustment. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 45-61. doi:10.1300/J008v19n02_04
40.
NashJ. K.KimJ. S. (2007). Patterns of change over time in beliefs legitimizing aggression in adolescents and young adults: Risk trajectories and their relationship with serious aggression. Social Work Research, 31, 231-240. doi:10.1093/swr/31.4.231
41.
OlweusD.LimberS. P. (2010). Bullying in school: Evaluation and dissemination of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80, 124-134. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01015.x
42.
PellegriniA. D. (2002). Bullying, victimization, and sexual harassment during the transition to middle school. Educational Psychologist, 37, 151-163. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3703_2
43.
SlabyR.GuerraN. (1988). Cognitive mediators of aggression in adolescent offenders: 1. Assessment. Developmental Psychology, 24, 580-588. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.4.580
44.
WernerN. E.HillL. G. (2010). Individual and peer group normative beliefs about relational aggression. Child Development, 81, 826-836. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01436.x
45.
WidamanK. F.ReiseS. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In BryantK. J.WindleM.WestS. G. (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281-324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10222-009
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
