Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-6
Good Character Is What We Look for in a Friend: Character Strengths Are Positively Related to Peer Acceptance and Friendship Quality in Early Adolescents
This study investigates the role of character strengths in peer relationships among early adolescents. A sample of students (N = 339; age = 12.84 years, 53.1% female) nominated friends in the classroom and completed assessments of character strengths, the desirability and importance of character strengths in a friend, and friendship quality. Results indicate that the character strengths of honesty, humor, kindness, and fairness were most desirable and important in a friend. Perspective, love, kindness, social intelligence, teamwork, leadership, and humor were associated with higher peer acceptance. Dyadic analyses of mutual best friends suggested that a number of character strengths were also positively related to friend-rated friendship quality. Overall, the results demonstrate the relevance of character strengths for positive peer relationships in adolescents.
BagwellC. L.SchmidtM. E. (2011). Friendships in childhood and adolescence. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
4.
BerndtT. J. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 7-10. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00157
5.
BonoG.FrohJ. J. (2009). Gratitude in school: Benefits to students and schools. In GilmanR.HuebnerE. S.FurlongM. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in the schools: Promoting wellness in children and youth (pp. 77-88). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
BukowskiW. M.CillessenA. H. N.VelásquezA. M. (2012). Peer ratings. In LaursenB. P.LittleT. D.CardN. A. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 211-228). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
8.
BukowskiW. M.SippolaL. K.NewcombA. F. (2000). Variations in patterns of attraction of same- and other-sex peers during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 36, 147-154.
9.
BuschorC.ProyerR. T.RuchW. (2013). Self- and peer-rated character strengths: How do they relate to satisfaction with life and orientations to happiness?The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 116-127. doi:10.1080/17439760.2012.758305
10.
CillessenA. H. N.RoseA. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102-105. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x
11.
CottrellC. A.NeubergS. L.LiN. P. (2007). What do people desire in others? A sociofunctional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 208-231. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.208
12.
DahlsgaardK.PetersonC.SeligmanM. E. P. (2005). Shared virtue: The convergence of valued human strengths across culture and history. Review of General Psychology, 9, 203-213. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.3.203
13.
DavisD. E.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.HookJ. N.EmmonsR. A.HillP. C.BollingerR. A.TongerenD. R. V. (2013). Humility and the development and repair of social bonds: Two longitudinal studies. Self and Identity, 12, 58-77. doi:10.1080/15298868.2011.636509
14.
FlanneryK. M.SmithR. L. (2017). Are peer status, friendship quality, and friendship stability equivalent markers of social competence?Adolescent Research Review, 2, 331-340. doi:10.1007/s40894-016-0042-z
15.
FrohJ. J.EmmonsR. A.CardN. A.BonoG.WilsonJ. A. (2011). Gratitude and the reduced costs of materialism in adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 289-302. doi:10.1007/s10902-010-9195-9
16.
FurmanW.BuhrmesterD. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63, 103-115. doi:10.2307/1130905
17.
GarandeauC. F.AhnH.-J.RodkinP. C. (2011). The social status of aggressive students across contexts: The role of classroom status hierarchy, academic achievement, and grade. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1699-1710. doi:10.1037/a0025271
18.
GarciaR. L.KennyD. A.LedermannT. (2015). Moderation in the actor–partner interdependence model. Personal Relationships, 22, 8-29. doi:10.1111/pere.12060
19.
GestS. D.Graham-BermannS. A.HartupW. W. (2001). Peer experience: Common and unique features of number of friendships, social network centrality, and sociometric status. Social Development, 10, 23-40. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00146
20.
GignacG. E.SzodoraiE. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74-78. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
21.
GlickG. C.RoseA. J. (2011). Prospective associations between friendship adjustment and social strategies: Friendship as a context for building social skills. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1117-1132. doi:10.1037/a0023277
22.
GrotpeterJ. K.CrickN. R. (1996). Relational aggression, overt aggression, and friendship. Child Development, 67, 2328-2338. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01860.x
23.
HartupW. W.StevensN. (1999). Friendships and adaptation across the life span. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 76-79. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00018
24.
Jensen-CampbellL. A.AdamsR.PerryD. G.WorkmanK. A.FurdellaJ. Q.EganS. K. (2002). Agreeableness, extraversion, and peer relations in early adolescence: Winning friends and deflecting aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 224-251. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2002.2348
25.
KennyD. A.CookW. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships, 6, 433-448. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00202.x
26.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27.
LaddG. W.KochenderferB. J.ColemanC. C. (1997). Classroom peer acceptance, friendship, and victimization: Distinct relation systems that contribute uniquely to children’s school adjustment?Child Development, 68, 1181-1197. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01993.x
28.
LarsonJ. J.WhittonS. W.HauserS. T.AllenJ. P. (2007). Being close and being social: Peer ratings of distinct aspects of young adult social competence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 136–148. doi:10.1080/0022389070146850
29.
McCallisterC.NashW. R.MeckstrothE. (1996). The social competence of gifted children: Experiments and experience. Roeper Review, 18, 273-276. doi:10.1080/02783199609553758
30.
McGheeP. E. (1989). Chapter 5: The contribution of humor to children’s social development. Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 20, 119-134. doi:10.1300/J274v20n01_09
31.
MendelsonM. J.AboudF. E. (1999). Measuring friendship quality in late adolescents and young adults: McGill Friendship Questionnaires. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 31, 130-132. doi:10.1037/h0087080
32.
ParkN.PetersonC. (2006). Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 891-909. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.011
33.
ParkN.PetersonC. (2009). Character strengths: Research and practice. Journal of College and Character, 10(4), 1-10. doi:10.2202/1940-1639.1042
34.
ParkerJ. G.AsherS. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 611-621. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.611
35.
ParkerJ. G.RubinK. H.ErathS. A.WojslawowiczJ. C.BuskirkA. A. (2006). Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment: A developmental psychopathology perspective. In CicchettiD.CohenD. J. (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology (pp. 419-493). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470939383.ch12
36.
PetersonC.SeligmanM. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
PeughJ. L.DiLilloD.PanuzioJ. (2013). Analyzing mixed-dyadic data using structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 314-337. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.769395
38.
PijlS. J.FrostadP.MjaavatnP.-E. (2011). Segregation in the classroom: What does it take to be accepted as a friend?Social Psychology of Education, 14, 41-55. doi:10.1007/s11218-010-9135-x
39.
PinheiroJ.BatesD.DebRoyS.SarkarD., & R Core Team. (2017). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models (R package version 3.1-131). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
40.
PlattT.WagnerL.RuchW. (2016). The association between class clown dimensions, school experiences and accomplishment. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 327-332. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.036
41.
RoseA. J.RudolphK. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98-131. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98
42.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
43.
RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.BowkerJ. C. (2015). Children in peer groups. In BornsteinM. H.LeventhalT.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Ecological settings and processes (7th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 175-222). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy405
44.
RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.ParkerJ. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In EisenbergN. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3, pp. 571-645). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0310
45.
RuchW.PlattT.HofmannJ. (2014). The character strengths of class clowns. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1075. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01075
46.
RuchW.ProyerR. T. (2015). Mapping strengths into virtues: The relation of the 24 VIA-strengths to six ubiquitous virtues. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 460. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00460
47.
RuchW.WeberM.ParkN.PetersonC. (2014). Character strengths in children and adolescents: Reliability and initial validity of the German Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth (German VIA-Youth). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 57-64. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000169
48.
RyanA. M. (2000). Peer groups as a context for the socialization of adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 35, 101-111. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3502_4
49.
SeligmanM. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York, NY: The Free Press.
50.
ShoshaniA.AvivI. (2012). The pillars of strength for first-grade adjustment—Parental and children’s character strengths and the transition to elementary school. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 315-326. doi:10.1080/17439760.2012.691981
51.
ShoshaniA.SloneM. (2013). Middle school transition from the strengths perspective: Young adolescents’ character strengths, subjective well-being, and school adjustment. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1163-1181. doi:10.1007/s10902-012-9374-y
52.
SmithR. L.RoseA. J. (2011). The “cost of caring” in youths’ friendships: Considering associations among social perspective taking, co-rumination, and empathetic distress. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1792-1803. doi:10.1037/a0025309
53.
SmithT. W.HoutM.MarsdenP. V. (2015). General Social Surveys, 1972-2014: Cumulative codebook. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
54.
SokatchA. (2017). Toward a research agenda: Building character strengths in school settings. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 1238-1239. doi:10.1007/s10964-017-0657-9
55.
SprecherS.ReganP. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 463-481. doi:10.1177/0265407502019004048
56.
ThomasK. K.BowkerJ. C. (2013). An investigation of desired friendships during early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 33, 867-890. doi:10.1177/0272431612469725
57.
VaillancourtT.HymelS. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer-valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 396-408. doi:10.1002/ab.20138
58.
WagnerL.GanderF.ProyerR. T.RuchW. (in press). Character strengths and PERMA: Investigating the relationships of character strengths with a multidimensional framework of well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life. doi: 10.1007/s11482-018-9695-z
59.
WagnerL.RuchW. (2015). Good character at school: Positive classroom behavior mediates the link between character strengths and school achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 610. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00610
60.
WaldripA. M.MalcolmK. T.Jensen-CampbellL. A. (2008). With a little help from your friends: The importance of high-quality friendships on early adolescent adjustment. Social Development, 17, 832-852. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00476.x
61.
WanzerM. B.Booth-ButterfieldM.Booth-ButterfieldS. (1996). Are funny people popular? An examination of humor orientation, loneliness, and social attraction. Communication Quarterly, 44, 42-52. doi:10.1080/01463379609369999
62.
WeberM.RuchW. (2012). The role of character strengths in adolescent romantic relationships: An initial study on partner selection and mates’ life satisfaction. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1537-1546. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.06.002
63.
WentzelK. R.CaldwellK. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198-1209. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01994.x
64.
WilsonR. E.HarrisK.VazireS. (2015). Personality and friendship satisfaction in daily life: Do everyday social interactions account for individual differences in friendship satisfaction?European Journal of Personality, 29, 173-186. doi:10.1002/per.1996
