This study evaluates the effect of attending a U.S. public middle or junior high school as compared with a K-8 school on eighth graders’ academic and psychosocial outcomes. In a national sample, we conducted propensity score weighted regression analysis. Initial findings indicated that for eighth-grade students, attending a middle or junior high school negatively affected teacher- and self-reported reading/writing competence. After applying population weights, only reading self-concept remained negatively affected by middle school enrollment. Exploratory analysis revealed the negative effects of attending a middle grade school may be present only for the students who enter kindergarten not at risk as measured by socioeconomic status (SES) or academic performance. Taken together, results suggest that negative impacts of middle grade schooling may be limited to teacher- and self-reported reading/writing competence, more pronounced in middle versus junior high school, and more salient for less disadvantaged students. Implications for theory, policy, and practice are discussed.
AlspaughJ. W. (1998). Achievement loss associated with the transition to middle school and high school. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 20-25. doi:10.1080/00220679809597572
2.
AndermanE. M. (2002). School effects on psychological outcomes during adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 795-809. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.795
3.
AndersonM. L. (2008). Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: A reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training projects. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 1481-1495. doi:10.1198/016214508000000841
BlythD. A.SimmonsR. G.BuschD. M. (1978). The transition into early adolescence: A longitudinal comparison of youth in two educational contexts. Sociology of Education, 51, 149-162. doi:10.2307/2112661
6.
BondL.ButlerH.ThomasL.CarlinJ.GloverS.BowesG.PattonG. (2007). Social and school connectedness in early secondary school as predictors of late teenage substance use, mental health, and academic outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(4), 9-18. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.10.013
7.
ByrnesV.RubyA. (2007). Comparing achievement between K–8 and middle schools: A large-scale empirical study. American Journal of Education, 114, 101-135. doi:10.1086/520693
8.
CantinS.BoivinM. (2004). Change and stability in children’s social network and self-perceptions during transition from elementary to junior high school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 561-570. doi:10.1080/01650250444000289
9.
CarolanB. V.WeissC. C.MatthewsJ. (2012, March). Which middle school model works best? Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. Paper presented at the Association for Education Finance and Policy Annual Conference, Boston, MA. Retrieved from http://www.aefpweb.org/sites/default/files/webform/
10.
ChingosM. M.WestM. R. (2011). Promotion and reassignment in public school districts: How do schools respond to differences in teacher effectiveness?Economics of Education Review, 30, 419-433. doi:10. 1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.011
11.
ChungH.EliasM.SchneiderK. (1998). Patterns of individual adjustment changes during middle school transition. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 83-101. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(97)00051-4
12.
ColeD. A.MaxwellS. E.MartinJ. M.PeekeL. G.SeroczynskiA. D.TramJ. M.. . . MaschmanT. (2001). The development of multiple domains of child and adolescent self-concept: A cohort sequential longitudinal design. Child Development, 72, 1723-1746. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00375
13.
CookP. J.MacCounR.MuschkinC.VigdorJ. (2008). The negative impacts of starting middle school in sixth grade. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 104-121. doi:10.1002/pam.20309
14.
CubanL. (1992). What happens to reforms that last? The case of the junior high school. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 227-251. doi:10.3102/00028312029002227
15.
EcclesJ. S.LordS.MidgleyC. (1991). What are we doing to early adolescents? The impact of educational contexts on early adolescents. American Journal of Education, 99(4), 521-542.
16.
EcclesJ. S.MidgleyC. (1989). Stage-environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. Research on Motivation in Education, 3, 139-186.
17.
EcclesJ. S.MidgleyC. (1990). Changes in academic motivation and self-perception. In MontemayorR.AdamsG.GullotaT. (Eds.), From childhood to adolescence: A transition period? (pp. 134-155). Newberry Park, CA: Sage.
18.
EcclesJ. S.MidgleyC.WigfieldA.BuchananC. M.ReumanD.FlanaganC.Mac IverD. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90-101.
19.
GelmanA.HillJ. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GershoffE. T.AberJ. L.RaverC. C.LennonM. C. (2007). Income is not enough: Incorporating material hardship into models of income associations with parenting and child development. Child Development, 78, 70-95. doi:10. 1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00986.x
21.
GreenJ.LiemG. A. D.MartinA. J.ColmarS.MarshH. W.McInerneyD. (2012). Academic motivation, self-concept, engagement, and performance in high school: Key processes from a longitudinal perspective. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1111-1122. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.02.016
22.
GrimmK. J. (2008). Longitudinal associations between reading and mathematics achievement. Development Neuropsychology, 33, 410-426. doi:10.1080/87565640801982486
23.
GuayF.RatelleC. F.RoyA.LitalienD. (2010). Academic self-concept, autonomous academic motivation, and academic achievement: Mediating and additive effects. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 644-653. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.08.001
24.
HeckmanJ.RobbR. (1985). Alternative methods for evaluating the effect of interventions. In HeckmanJ.Singer (Eds.), Longitudinal analysis of labor market data (pp. 156-246). New York, NY: John Wiley.
25.
HiebertJ., (Ed.). (2013). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge.
26.
HillC. J.BloomH. S.BlackA. R.LipseyM. W. (2008). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Development Perspectives, 2, 172-177. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00061.x
27.
ImbensG. (2004). Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 4-29. doi:10.1162/003465304323023651
28.
KeatonP. (2012). Numbers and types of public elementary and secondary education agencies from the Common Core of Data: School year 2010-11 (NCES 2012-325rev). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
29.
KiefferM. J. (2013). Development of reading and mathematics skills in early adolescence: Do K-8 public schools make a difference?Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6, 361-379. doi:10.1080/19345747.2013.822954
30.
KimH. Y.SchwartzK.CappellaE.SeidmanE. (2014). Navigating the middle grades: Role of social context in middle grade school climate. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54, 28-45. doi:10.1007/s10464-014-9659-x
31.
KlingK. C.HydeJ. S.ShowersC. J.BuswellB. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(4), 470-500.
32.
LangerJ. A. (2001). Beating the odds: Teaching middle and high school students to read and write well. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 837-880. doi:10.3102/00028312038004837
33.
LernerR. M.SteinbergL. (2004). Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
34.
LittleR. J. A.RubinD. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
35.
ManningM. L. (2000). A brief history of the middle school. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 73, 192-192. doi:10.1080/00098650009600946
36.
MarshH. W. (1992). Self Description Questionnaire (SDQ) II: A Theoretical and Empirical Basis for the Measurement of Multiple Dimensions of Adolescent Self-Concept: An Interim Test Manual and a Research Monograph. New South Wales, Australia: University of Western Sydney, Faculty of Education.
37.
MarshH. W.HauK. T. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364-376. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.364
38.
MarshH. W.ScalasL. F.NagengastB. (2010). Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles. Psychological Assessment, 22, 366-381. doi:10.1037/a0019225
39.
McCoyD. C.RoyA. L.SirkmanG. M. (2013). Neighborhood crime and school climate as predictors of elementary school academic quality: A cross-lagged panel analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52, 128-140. doi:10.1007/s10464-013-9583-5
40.
McKownC.WeinsteinR. S. (2002). Modeling the role of child ethnicity and gender in children’s differential response to teacher expectations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 159-184. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01425.x
41.
MidgleyC.AndermanE.HicksL. (1995). Differences between elementary and middle school teachers and students: A goal theory approach. Journal of Early Adolescence, 15, 90-113. doi:10.1177/0272431695015001006
42.
NajarianM.PollackJ. M.SorongonA. G. (2009). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998-99 (ECLS-K): Psychometric report for the eighth grade (NCES 2009-002). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
43.
RobinsR. W.TrzesniewskiK. H.TracyJ. L.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2002). Global self-esteem across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 17, 423-434. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.3.423
44.
RockoffJ. E.LockwoodB. B. (2010). Stuck in the middle: Impacts of grade configuration in public schools. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 1051-1061. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.06.017
45.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
46.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
RubinD. B. (1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. Annals of Statistics, 6, 34-58.
48.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
49.
SchwartzA. E.StiefelL.RubensteinR.ZabelJ. (2011). The path not taken: How does school organization affect eighth-grade achievement?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 293-317. doi:10.3102/0162373711407062
50.
SchwerdtG.WestM. R. (2013). The impact of alternative grade configurations on student outcomes through middle and high school. Journal of Public Economics, 97, 308-326. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.10.002
51.
SeidmanE.AberJ. L.FrenchS. E. (2004). The organization of schooling and adolescent development. In MatonK.SchellenbachC.LeadbeaterB.SolarzA. (Eds.), Investing in children, youth, families, and communities: Strengths-based research and policy (pp. 233-250). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
52.
SeidmanE.AllenL.AberJ. L.MitchellC.FeinmanJ. (1994). The impact of school transitions in early adolescence on the self-system and perceived social context of poor urban youth. Child Development, 65, 507-522. doi:10.2307/1131399
53.
SimmonsR. G.BlythD. A. (1987). Moving into adolescence: The impact of pubertal change and school context. New York, NY: Aldine.
54.
SimmonsR. G.BurgesonR.ReefM. J. (1988). Cumulative change at entry to adolescence. In GunnarM. G.CollinsW. A. (Eds.), Development during the transition to adolescence (pp. 123-150). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
ThornburgH. D.JonesR. M. (1982). Social characteristics of early adolescents: Age versus grade. Journal of Early Adolescence, 2, 229-239. doi:10.1177/027243168200200304
57.
TourangeauR.GrovesR. M.KennedyC.YanT. (2009). The presentation of a web survey, nonresponse, and measurement error among members of a web panel. Journal of Official Statistics, 25, 299-321.
58.
WeissC. C.KipnesL. (2006). Reexamining middle school effects: A comparison of middle grades students in middle schools and k–8 schools. American Journal of Education, 112, 239-272. doi:10.1086/498996
59.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S.Mac IverD.ReumanD. A.MidgleyC. (1991). Transitions during early adolescence: Changes in children’s domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27, 552-565. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.4.552
60.
WigfieldA.WagnerA. L. (2005). Competence, motivation, and identity development during adolescence. In ElliotA. J.DweckC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 222-239). New York, NY: Guilford.
61.
WilliamsonR.JohnstonJ. H. (1999). Challenging orthodoxy: An emerging agenda for middle level reform. Middle School Journal, 30(4), 10-17. doi:10.1080/00940771.1999.11494592
62.
WinshipC.MorganS. L. (1999). The estimation of causal effects from observational data. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 659-706.
63.
WoltersC. A.DaughertyS. G. (2007). Goal structures and teachers’ sense of efficacy: Their relation and association to teaching experience and academic level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 181-193. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.181
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
