This study examined the longitudinal and bidirectional relations between same-sex (SS) and other-sex (OS) popularity and preference across one school year. Participants were 271 sixth-grade students who completed peer nomination measures at three time points in their schools. Tests of cross-lagged autoregressive models indicated that SS popularity predicted later OS popularity and vice versa. OS preference predicted later SS preference but not vice versa. Findings highlight the importance of more carefully considering the distinctions and associations between SS and OS popularity and preference during early adolescence while setting the stage for future group-level peer relations research.
ArndorferC.L.StormshakE.A. (2008). Same-sex versus other-sex best friendship in early adolescence: Longitudinal predictors of antisocial behavior throughout adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 1059-1070. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9311-x.
2.
AsherS.R.McDonaldK. L. (2009). The behavioral basis of acceptance, rejection, and perceived popularity. In RubinK.H.BukowskiW.LaursenB. (Eds.), The handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 232-248). New York: Guilford.
3.
Booth-LaForceC.OhW.KennedyA. E.RubinK. H.Rose-KrasnorL.LaursenB. (2012). Parent and peer links to trajectories of anxious withdrawal from grades 5 to 8. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 41, 138-149. doi:10.1080/15374416.2012.651995
4.
BorelliJ. L.PrinsteinM. (2006). Reciprocal, longitudinal associations among adolescents’ negative feedback-seeking, depressive symptoms, and peer relations. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 159-169. doi:10.1007/s10802-005-9010-y
5.
BowkerJ. C.SpencerS. V.ThomasK. K.GyoerkoeE. A. (2012). Having and being an other-sex crush during early adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111, 629-643. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.11.008
6.
BuckK. A.DixT. (2012). Can developmental changes in inhibition and peer relationships explain why depressive symptoms increase in early adolescence?Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 403-413. doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9651-9
7.
BukowskiW.M.GauzeC.HozaB.NewcombA.F. (1993). Differences and consistency between same-sex and other-sex peer relationships during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 29, 255-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.2.255
8.
BukowskiW. M.SippolaL. K.HozaB. (1999). Same and other: Interdependency between participation in same- and other-sex friendships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28, 439-459. doi:10.1023/A:1021664923911
9.
CardN. A.HodgesE. V. E.LittleT.HawleyP. H. (2005). Gender effects in peer nominations for aggression and social status. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 146-155. doi:10.1080/01650250444000414
10.
CarlsonW.RoseA.J. (2007). The role of reciprocity in romantic relationships in middle childhood and early adolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 53, 262-290. doi:10.1353/mpq.2007.0008
11.
CillessenA. H. N.MayeuxL. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147-163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x
12.
CoieJ.DodgeK.CoppotelliH. (1982). Dimensions and types of status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-570. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557
13.
ConnollyJ.CraigW.GoldbergA.PeplerD. (2004). Mixed-gender groups, dating and romantic relationships in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 14, 185-207. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2004.01402003.x
14.
ConnollyJ.FurmanW.KonarskiR. (2000). The role of peers in the emergence of heterosexual romantic relationships in adolescence. Child Development, 71, 1395-1408. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00235
15.
DijkstraJ. K.CillessenA. H. N.LindenbergS. M.VeenstraR. (2010). Basking in reflected glory and its limits: Why adolescents hang out with popular peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 942-958.
16.
DijkstraJ. K.LindenbergS.VeenstraR. (2007). Same-gender and cross-gender peer acceptance and rejection and their relation to bullying and helping among preadolescents: Comparing predictions from gender-homophily and goal-framing approaches. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1377-1389. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1377
17.
DunphyD. C. (1963). The social structure of urban adolescent peer groups. Sociometry, 26, 230-246. doi:10.2307/2785909
18.
FrazierS. L.AtkinsM. S.OlsonL. H.LyonA. R. (2009). Same-sex and other-sex peer reports: Unique contributors to understanding children’s school adjustment. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31, 152-158. doi:10.1007/s10862-008-9105-1
19.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
20.
KlineR.B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Third Edition). New York: Guilford Press.
21.
LaFontanaK. M.CillessenA. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19, 130-147. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x
22.
MarksP.E.L.BabcockBCillessenA.H.N.CrickN.R. (2013). The effects of participation rate on the internal reliability of peer nomination measures. Social Development, 22, 609-622. doi:10.1111/j.1467-95-7.2012.00661.x
23.
McDonaldK. L.Dashiell-AjeE.MenzerM. M.RubinK.OhW.BowkerJ. C. (2013). Contributions of racial and sociobehavioral homophily to friendship stability and quality among same-race and cross-race friends. Journal of Early Adolescence, 33, 897-919. doi:10.1177/0272431612472259
24.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2011). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
25.
OhW.RubinK. H.BowkerJ. C.Booth-LaForceC.Rose-KrasnorL.LaursenB. (2008). Trajectories of social withdrawal from middle childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 553-566. doi:10.1007/s10802-007-9199-z
26.
PoulinF.DenaultA. (2012). Other-sex friendships as a mediator between parental monitoring and substance use in girls and boys. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 1488-1501. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9770-y
27.
RothM. A.ParkerJ. G. (2001). Affective and behavioral responses to friends who neglect their friends for dating partners: Influences of gender, jealousy and perspective. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 281-296. doi:10.1006/jado.2001.0408
28.
RubinK.H.BukowskiW.ParkerJ. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In EisenbergN. (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology (6th edition): Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 571-645). New York: Wiley.
29.
SainioM.VeenstraR.LittleT.D.KarnaA.RonkkoM.SalmivalliC. (2013). Being bullied by same- verus other-sex peers: Does it matter for adolescent victims?Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 42, 454-466. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.769172
30.
SeligJ. P.LittleT. D. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In LaursenB.LittleT. D.CardN. A. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 265-278). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
31.
SullivanH. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
32.
Troop-GordonW.RanneyJ. (2014). Popularity among same-sex and cross-sex peers: A process-oriented examination of links to aggressive behaviors and depressive affect. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1721-1733. doi:10.1037/a0036417
33.
VaillancourtT.HymelS. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer-valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 396-408. doi:10.1002/ab.20138
34.
Wojslawowicz BowkerJ. C.RubinK. H.BurgessK. B.Booth-LaForceC.Rose-KrasnorL. (2006). Behavioral characteristics associated with stable and fluid best friendship patterns in middle childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 671-693. doi:10.1353/mpq.2006.0000
