Despite ample evidence on the negative association between sibship size and educational attainment, relatively fewer studies have directly addressed the immediate effect of sibship size on children’s family resources. With data from a nationally representative survey in China, this study estimated the effects of sibship size on various family resources for Chinese adolescents between ages 10 and 15, with a particular interest in the possible role of gender on resource allocation. Consistent with prior research on educational attainment, sibship size was negatively associated with the amount of resources a child received from the family. Siblings who were closer in ages had equal or more negative effects on family resources a child received compared with widely spaced siblings. A more rapid decrease was observed in economic resources than in interpersonal resources. Furthermore, brothers showed greater negative effects than sisters. The current findings provided direct evidence for the resource dilution theory.
BaydarN.HyleP.Brooks-GunnJ. (1997). A longitudinal study of the effects of the birth of a sibling during preschool and early grade school years. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 957-965.
2.
BlakeJ. (1981). Family size and the quality of children. Demography, 18, 421-442.
3.
BonesronningH.MassihS. S. (2011). Birth order effects on young students’ academic achievement. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 824-832.
4.
ButcherK. F.CaseA. (1994). The effect of sibling sex composition on women’s education and earnings. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 531-563. doi:10.2307/2118413
5.
ChengC.-C. J.WangW.-L.SungY.-T.WangY.-C.SuS.-Y.LiC.-Y. (2013). Effect modification by parental education on the associations of birth order and gender with learning achievement in adolescents. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39, 894-902. doi:10.1111/j.1365–2214.2012.01427.x
6.
ChuC. Y. C.XieY.YuR.-r. (2007). Effects of sibship structure revisited: Evidence from intrafamily resource transfer in Taiwan. Sociology of Education, 80, 91-113.
7.
ConleyD. (2000). Sibship sex composition: Effects on educational attainment. Social Science Research, 29, 441-457. doi:10.1006/ssre.2000.0678
8.
DayiogluM.KirdarM. G.TanselA. (2009). Impact of sibship size, birth order and sex composition on school enrollment in urban Turkey. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71, 399-426. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00540.x
9.
DowneyD. B. (1995). When bigger is not better: Family size, parental resources, and children’s educational performance. American Sociological Review, 60, 746-761.
10.
DowneyD. B. (2001). Number of siblings and intellectual development: The resource dilution explanation. American Psychologist, 56, 497-504.
11.
de HaanM. (2010). Birth order, family size and educational attainment. Economics of Education Review, 29, 576-588. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.10.012
12.
HauserR. M.KuoH.-H. D. (1998). Does the gender composition of sibships affect women’s educational attainment?The Journal of Human Resources, 33, 644-657. doi:10.2307/146336
13.
HeskethT.LuL.XingZ. W. (2005). The effect of China’s One-Child Family Policy after 25 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 353, 1171-1176. doi:10.1056/NEJMhpr051833
14.
JacobM. (2011). Do brothers affect their sisters’ chances to graduate? An analysis of sibling sex composition effects on graduation from a university or a Fachhochschule in Germany. High Education, 61, 277-291. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9377-8
15.
JagerM. M. (2009). Sibship size and educational attainment. A joint test of the confluence model and the resource dilution hypothesis. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 27, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2009.01.002
16.
KanazawaS. (2012). Intelligence, birth order, and family size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1157-1164. doi:10.1177/0146167212445911
17.
KangC. (2011). Family size and educational investments in children: Evidence from private tutoring expenditures in South Korea. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 73, 59-78. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2010.00607.x
18.
LuY.TreimanD. J. (2008). The effect of sibship size on educational attainment in China: Period variations. American Sociological Review, 73, 813-834. doi:10.1177/000312240807300506
19.
MarjoribanksK.WalbergH. J.BargenM. (1975). Mental abilities: Sibling constellation and social class correlates. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14(2), 109-116.
20.
MarteletoL. (2010). Family size and schooling throughout the demographic transition: Evidence from Brazil. Demographic Research, 23, Article 15.
21.
SenA.ClementeA. (2010). Intergenerational correlations in educational attainment: Birth order and family size effects using Canadian data. Economics of Education Review, 29, 147-155.
22.
SillesM. A. (2010). The implications of family size and birth order for test scores and behavioral development. Economics of Education Review, 29, 795-803.
23.
SingerJ. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 323-355. doi:10.3102/10769986023004323
24.
SteelmanL. C.PowellB.WerumR.CarterS. (2002). Reconsidering the effects of sibling configuration: Recent advances and challenges. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 243-269.
25.
TsuiM.RichL. (2002). The only child and educational opportunity for girls in urban China. Gender and Society, 16, 74-92. doi:10.2307/3081877
26.
WangJ. (2003). Estimation of TFR level with changing childbearing pattern in China: 1990-2000. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 4, 32-38.
27.
XieY. (2012). The user’s guide of the China Family Panel Studies (2010). Beijing, China: Institute of Social Science Survey, Peking University.
28.
XuH.XieY. (2013, August). The causal effects of rural-to-urban migration on children’s wellbeing in China (PSC Research Report No. 13-798). University of Michigan, MI: Population Studies Center.
29.
ZajoncR. B. (2001). The family dynamics of intellectual development. American Psychologist, 56, 490-496.
