The Role of Social Networking Sites in Early Adolescents’ Social Lives

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the role of social networking sites (SNSs) in early adolescents’ social lives. First, we investigated the relation between SNS use and several aspects of early adolescents’ social lives (i.e., friendship quality, bridging social capital, and bonding social capital). Second, we examined whether there are differences between SNS users and nonusers in terms of their social lives. Drawing on a survey among 3,068 early adolescents, results showed positive relations between SNS use and friendship quality, bridging social capital, and bonding social capital. Furthermore, we found positive effects of SNS membership on these social indicators. In sum, even though concerns have been voiced about a possible negative impact of SNS use on adolescents’ social lives, we found no evidence of this. Results of this study show that the role of SNSs in early adolescents’ social lives is positive at least concerning friendship quality, bridging social capital, and bonding social capital.

Keywords

communication friendship media and technology (music,TV,magazines,Internet,gaming,iphones,and messaging)peer relationships

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler

P. A.

Adler

(1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Ahn

(2012). Teenagers’ experiences with social network sites: Relationship to bridging and bonding social capital. The Information Society: An International Journal, 28, 99-109.

Antheunis

M. L.

Schouten

A. P.

(2011). The effects of other-generated and system-generated cues on adolescents’ perceived attractiveness on social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 391-406.

Antheunis

M. L.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Peter

(2010). Getting acquainted through social network sites: Testing a model of online uncertainty reduction and social attraction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 100-109.

Barker

(2009). Older adolescents’ motivations for social network site use: The influence of gender, group identity and collective self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 209-213.

Baumeister

R. F.

Leary

M. R.

(1995). The need to belong—Desire for interpersonal attachments as fundamental human-motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.

Berndt

T. J.

Keefe

(1995). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ adjustment to school. Child Development, 66, 1312-1329.

Bourdieu

Wacquant

(1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Boyd

D. M.

(2004, April 24-29). Friendster and publicly articulated social networking. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria.

10.

Brandtzaeg

P. B.

(2012). Social networking sites: Their users and social implications—A longitudinal study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 467-488.

11.

Brown

B. B.

(1990). Peer groups and peer culture. In Feldman

S. S.

Elliott

G. R.

(Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 171-196). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

12.

Bryant

J. A.

Sanders-Jackson

Smallwood

A. M. K.

(2006). IMing, text messaging, and adolescent social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 577-592.

13.

Buhrmester

(2002, April). The development of interpersonal competence during adolescence: A six year longitudinal study. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, New Orleans, LA.

14.

Crockett

Losoff

Petersen

A. C.

(1984). Perception of the peer group and friendship in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 4, 155-181.

15.

Donath

J. S.

Boyd

(2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71-82.

16.

Douvan

Adelson

(1966). The adolescent experience. New York, NY: John Wiley.

17.

Ellison

N. B.

Steinfield

Lampe

(2007). The benefits of Facebook “Friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.

18.

Ellison

N. B.

Steinfield

Lampe

(2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13, 873-892.

19.

Ellison

N. B.

Vitak

Gray

Lampe

(2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 855-870.

20.

Erath

S. A.

Flanagan

K. S.

Bierman

K. L.

(2007). Social anxiety and peer relationships in early adolescence: Behavioral and cognitive factors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 405-416.

21.

Erdley

C. A.

Nangle

D. W.

Newman

J. E.

Carpenter

E. M.

(2001). Children’s friendship experiences and psychological adjustment: Theory and research. In Nangle

D. W.

Erdley

C. A.

(Eds.), New directions for child development: No. 91. The role of friendship in psychological adjustment (pp. 5-23). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

22.

Fitzpatrick

K. M.

Piko

B. F.

Wright

D. R.

LaGory

(2005). Depressive symptomatology, exposure to violence, and the role of social capital among African American adolescents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75, 262-274.

23.

Furman

Buhrmester

(1985). Children’s perceptions of the personal relationship in their social networks. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1016-1024.

24.

Granovetter

(1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233.

25.

Gross

E. F.

(2004). Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 633-649.

26.

Halliman

M. T.

(1995). Patterns of cliquing among youth. In Foot

H. C.

Chapman

A. J.

Smith

J. R.

(Eds.), Friendship and social relations in children (pp. 321-342). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

27.

Hargittai

(2008). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 276-297.

28.

Harter

(1999). The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

29.

Hartup

W. W.

(1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67, 1-13.

30.

Haythornthwaite

(2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8, 125-147.

31.

Hetherington

E. M.

Morris

W. M.

(1978). Introductory psychology in depth: Developmental topics. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

32.

Hinduja

Patchin

J. W.

(2008). Personal information of adolescents on the Internet: A quantitative content analysis of MySpace. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 125-146.

33.

Huang

(2010). Internet use and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 241-249.

34.

Joinson

A. N.

(2008, April 5-10). “Looking at,” “looking up” or “keeping up with” people? Motives and uses of Facebook. Paper presented at the CHI, Florence, Italy.

35.

Keefe

Berndt

T. J.

(1996). Relations of friendship quality to self-esteem in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 16, 110-129.

36.

Kenski

Stroud

N. J.

(2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 173-192.

37.

Kobayashi

Ikeda

K. I.

Miyata

(2006). Social capital online: Collective use of the Internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy. Information, Communication, & Society, 9, 582-611.

38.

Kroger

(2000). Identity development. Adolescence through adulthood. London, England: SAGE.

39.

Kross

Verduyn

Demiralp

Park

Lee

D. S.

Lin

. . . Ybarra

(2013). Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e69841.

40.

La Greca

A. M.

Lopez

(1998). Social anxiety among adolescents: Linkages with peer relations and friendships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 83-94.

41.

Lampe

Ellison

N. B.

Steinfield

(2006, November 4-6). A Face(book): In the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. Paper presented at the 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Banff, Alberta, Canada.

42.

Lampe

Vitak

Ellison

N. B.

(2013). Users and nonusers: Interaction between levels of Facebook adoption and social capital. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 809-820). New York, NY: ACM.

43.

Lenhart

Madden

Smith

Purcell

Zickur

Rainie

(2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites: How American teens navigate the new world of “digital citizenship.” Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.

44.

Lin

(1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22, 28-51.

45.

Livingstone

(2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10, 393-411.

46.

Livingstone

Haddon

Görzig

Olafsson

(2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. Full findings and policy implications from the EU Kids Online survey of 9-16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries. London, England: LSE, EU Kids Online.

47.

Marketingfacts. (2013). Social media in Nederland: Jongeren blijven Facebook trouw [Social media use in the Netherlands: Adolescents stick to Facebook]. Retrieved from http://www.marketingfacts.nl/berichten/nationale-social-media-onderzoek-2014

48.

Nangle

D. W.

Erdley

C. A.

Newman

J. E.

Mason

C. A.

Carpenter

E. M.

(2003). Popularity, friendship quantity, and friendship quality: Interactive influences on children’s loneliness and depression. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 32, 546-555.

49.

Nie

N. H.

(2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 420-435.

50.

Ojanen

Sijtsema

J. J.

Hawley

P. H.

Little

T. D.

(2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in early adolescents’ friendship development: Friendship selection, influence, and prospective friendship quality. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 837-851.

51.

Ong

E. Y. L.

Ang

R. P.

J. C. M.

Lim

J. C. Y.

Lee

C. S.

Chua

A. Y. K.

(2011). Narcissism, extraversion and adolescents’ self-presentation on Facebook. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 180-185.

52.

Putnam

(2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

53.

Quinn

Oldmeadow

(2013). The Martini effect and social networking sites: Early adolescents, mobile social networking and connectedness to friends. Mobile Media & Communication, 1, 237-247.

54.

Resnick

(2001). Beyond bowling together: Sociotechnical capital. In Carroll

(Ed.), HCI in the new millennium (pp. 647-672). New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.

55.

Riddle

Potter

W. J.

Metzger

M. J.

Nabi

R. L.

Linz

D. G.

(2011). Beyond cultivation: Exploring the effects of frequency, recency, and vivid autobiographical memories for violent media. Media Psychology, 14, 168-191.

56.

Schouten

A. P.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Peter

(2007). Precursors and underlying processes of adolescents’ online self-disclosure: Testing an “Internet-Attribute-Perception” model. Media Psychology, 10, 292-315.

57.

Sebald

(1992). Adolescence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

58.

Steinberg

Morris

A. S.

(2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83-110.

59.

Steinfield

Ellison

N. B.

Lampe

(2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 434-445.

60.

Stutzman

Vitak

Ellison

N. B.

Gray

Lampe

(2012). Privacy in interaction: Exploring disclosure and social capital in Facebook. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.

61.

Subrahmanyama

Reich

S. M.

Waechter

Espinoza

(2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 420-433.

62.

Thelwall

Wilkinson

(2010). Public dialogs in social network sites: What is their purpose? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 392-404.

63.

Tong

Walther

J. B.

(2011). Relational maintenance and CMC. In Wright

K. B.

Webb

L. M.

(Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 98-118). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

64.

Turkle

(2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Philadelphia, PA: Basic Books.

65.

Valenzuela

Park

Kee

K. F.

(2009). Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 875-901.

66.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Peter

(2007a). Internet communication and its relation to well-being: Identifying some underlying mechanisms. Media Psychology, 9, 43-58.

67.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Peter

(2007b). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1169-1182.

68.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Peter

(2007c). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43, 267-277.

69.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Peter

(2009a). The effects of Instant Messaging on the quality of adolescents’ existing friendships: A longitudinal study. Journal of Communication, 59, 79-97.

70.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Peter

(2009b). Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents: A decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 1-5.

71.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Peter

Schouten

A. P.

(2006). Friends networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 584-590.

72.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Schouten

A. P.

Peter

(2005). Developing a model of adolescent friendship formation on the Internet. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8, 423-430.

73.

Walther

J. B.

(1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.

74.

Williams

(2006). On and off the ’Net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 593-628.