Sexually objectifying messages about girls and women are common in U.S. popular culture. As a consequence of exposure to such messages, girls may develop “internalized sexualization,” or internalization of the belief that sexual attractiveness to males is an important aspect of their identity. We hypothesized that internalized sexualization is associated with behavioral and psychological consequences, including sexualized clothing use, body surveillance, and body shame. In two studies of early adolescent girls (total N = 330, age range = 10-15), we found that girls with higher levels of internalized sexualization wear more sexualized clothing (Study 1) and show higher levels of body surveillance and body shame (Study 2) than girls with lower levels of internalized sexualization.
American Psychological Association Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization.html
2.
AubreyJ. S.FrisbyC. M. (2011). Sexual objectification in music videos: A content analysis comparing gender and genre. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 475-501. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.513468
3.
AubreyJ. S.HopperM.MbureW. (2011). Check that body! The effects of sexually objectifying music videos on college men’s sexual beliefs. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55, 360-379. doi:10.1080/08838151.2011.597469
4.
BlakemoreJ. E. O.BerenbaumS. A.LibenL. S. (2009). Gender development. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
5.
BöckingS.BöckingT. (2009). Parental mediation of television. Journal of Children and Media, 3, 286-302. doi:10.180/17482790902999959
6.
BorkenauP.LieblerA. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero-acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645-657. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.645
7.
BrownL. M. (2011). We’re taking back sexy: Girl bloggers SPARK a movement and create enabling conditions for healthy sexuality. Girlhood Studies, 4, 47-69. doi:10.3167/ghs.2011.040205
8.
ChillmanC. S. (1990). Promoting healthy adolescent sexuality. Family Relations, 39, 123-131. doi:10.2307/585712
9.
ChoudhuryS.BlakemoreS.-J.CharmanT. (2006). Social cognitive development during adolescence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 165-174. doi:10.1093/scan/nsl024
10.
ConradK.DixonT. L.ZhangY. (2009). Controversial rap themes, gender portrayals and skin tone distortion: A content analysis of rap music videos. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53, 134-156. doi:10.1080/08838150802643795
11.
CraneD. (2000). Fashion and its social agendas: Class, gender, and identity in clothing. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
12.
DanielsE. A.LaVoiN. M. (2013). Athletics as solution and problem: Sport participation for girls and the sexualization of female athletes. In ZurbriggenE.RobertsT. A. (Eds.), The sexualization of girls and girlhood: Causes, consequences, and resistance (pp. 63-83). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
DanielsE. A.WartenaH. (2011). Athlete or sex symbol: What boys think of media representations of female athletes. Sex Roles, 65, 566-579. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9959-7
14.
DavisF. (1992). Fashion, culture, and identity. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
15.
DownsE.SmithS. L. (2010). Keeping abreast of hypersexuality: A video game character content analysis. Sex Roles, 62, 721-733. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9637-1
16.
Else-QuestN. M.HydeJ. S. (2009). The missing discourse of development: Commentary on Lerum and Dworkin. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 264-267. doi:10.1080/00224490903079559
FazioR. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75-109). New York, NY: Academic Press.
19.
FinkJ. S.KensickiL. J. (2002). An imperceptible difference: Visual and textual constructions of femininity in Sports Illustrated and Sports Illustrated for Women. Mass Communication and Society, 5, 317-339. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0503_5
20.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
21.
FlugelJ. C. (1930). The psychology of clothes. London, England: Hogarth Press.
22.
FoxJ.BailensonJ. N.TricaseL. (2013). The embodiment of sexualized virtual selves: The Proteus effect and experiences of self-objectification via avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 930-938. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.027
23.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
24.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT.-A.NollS. M.QuinnD. M.TwengeJ. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269-284. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.269
25.
GoodinS. M.Van DenburgA.MurnenS. K.SmolakL. (2011). “Putting on” sexiness: A content analysis of the presence of sexualizing characteristics in girls’ clothing. Sex Roles, 65, 1-12. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9966-8
26.
GrabeS.HydeJ. S.LindbergS. M. (2007). Body objectification and depression in adolescents: The role of gender, shame, and rumination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 164-175. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00350.x
27.
GrabeS.WardL. M.HydeJ. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 460-476. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.460
28.
GrammerK.RenningerL.FischerB. (2004). Disco clothing, female sexual motivation, and relationship status: Is she dressed to impress?Journal of Sex Research, 41, 66-74. doi:10.1080/00224490409552214
29.
HallP. C.WestJ. H.HillS. (2012). Sexualization in lyrics of popular music from 1959 to 2009: Implications for sexuality educators. Sexuality & Culture, 16, 103-117. doi:10.1007/s12119-011-9103-4
30.
ImpettE. A.SchoolerD.TolmanD. L. (2006). To be seen and not heard: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ sexual health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 129-142. doi:10.1007/s10508-005-9016-0
31.
JewellJ. A.BrownC. S. (2013). Sexting, catcalls, and butt slaps: How gender stereotypes and perceived group norms predict sexualized behavior. Sex Roles, 69, 594-604. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0320-1
32.
KlingK. C.HydeJ. S.ShowerC. J.BuswellB. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 470-500. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.4.470
33.
LevinD. E.KilbourneJ. (2008). So sexy so soon: The new sexualized childhood and what parents can do to protect their kids. New York, NY: Random House.
34.
LevineJ. M. (1983). Social comparison and education. In LevineJ. M.WangM. C. (Eds.), Teacher and student perception: Implications for learning (pp. 29-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
LindbergS. M.HydeJ. S.McKinleyN. M. (2006). A measure of objectified body consciousness for preadolescent and adolescent youth. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 65-76. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00263.x
36.
LissM.ErchullM. J.RamseyL. R. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the enjoyment of sexualization scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 55-68. doi:10.1177/0146167210386119
37.
MartinM. C.KennedyP. F. (1993). Advertising and social comparison: Consequences for female preadolescents and adolescents. Psychology & Marketing, 10, 513-530. doi:10.1002/mar.4220100605
38.
MartinoS. M.CollinsR. L.ElliottM. N.StrachmanA.KanouseD. E.BerryS. H. (2006). Exposure to degrading versus nondegrading music lyrics and sexual behavior among youth. Pediatrics, 118, 430-441. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-0131
39.
McKenneyS. J.BiglerR. S. (2010, March). Development of the Internalized Sexualization Scale (ISS) for pre- and early adolescent girls. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Philadelphia, PA.
40.
McKenneyS. J.BiglerR. S. (2014). High heels, low grades: Internalized sexualization and academic orientation among adolescent girls. Journal of Research on Adolescence. doi: 10.1111/jora.12179
41.
McKinleyN. M.HydeJ. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181-215. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x
42.
MoradiB.HuangY.-P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377-398. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
43.
MurnenS. K.SmolakL. (2013). I’d rather be a famous fashion model than a famous scientist: The rewards and costs of internalizing sexualization. In ZurbriggenE.RobertsT. A. (Eds.), The sexualization of girls and girlhood: Causes, consequences, and resistance (pp. 235-253). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
NaumannL. P.VazireS.RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D. (2009). Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1661-1671. doi:10.1177/0146167209346309
45.
NichterM. (2000). Fat talk: What girls and their parents are saying about dieting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
Nolen-HoeksemaS.GirgusJ. S. (1994). The emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 424-443. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.424
47.
PiacentiniM.MailerG. (2004). Symbolic consumption in teenagers’ clothing choices. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 3, 251-262. doi:10.1002/cb.138
48.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
RubleD. N.MartinC.BerenbaumS. (2006). Gender development. In DamonW.LernerR. M. (Series Eds.) and EisenbergN. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3). (pp. 858-932). New York: Wiley.
51.
SignorellaM. L. (1987). Gender schemata: Individual differences and context effects. In LibenL. S.SignorellaM. L. (Eds.), Children’s gender schemata (New Directions for Child Development, No. 38) (pp. 89-105). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
52.
SignorellaM. L.BiglerR. S.LibenL. S. (1993). Developmental differences in children’s gender schemata about others: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Review, 13, 147-183. doi:10.1006/drev.1993.1007
StarrC. R.FergusonG. M. (2012). Sexy dolls, sexy grade-schoolers? Media and maternal influences on young girls’ self-sexualization. Sex Roles, 67, 463-476. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0183-x
55.
StermerP. S.BurkleyM. (2012). Xbox or SeXbox? An examination of sexualized content in video games. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 525-535. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00442.x
56.
SwainJ. (2002). The right stuff: Fashioning an identity through clothing in a junior school. Gender and Education, 14, 53-69. doi:10.1080/09540250120098889
57.
TolmanD. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58.
VandenboschL.EggermontS. (2014). The role of mass media in adolescents’ sexual behaviors: Exploring the explanatory value of the three-step self-objectification process. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0292-4
59.
WallisC. (2011). Performing gender: A content analysis of gender display in music videos. Sex Roles, 64, 160-172. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9814-2
60.
WhiteS. E. (1995). A content analytic technique for measuring the sexiness of women’s business attire in media presentations. Communication Research Reports, 12, 178-185. doi:10.1080/08824099509362054
61.
ZurbriggenE. L.RobertsT.-A. (2013). (Eds.). The sexualization of girls and girlhood: Causes, consequences, and resistance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
