This study examined early adolescents’ beliefs about which academic self-presentation strategies hypothetical hard-working, high-achieving students should use with popular peers, adolescents’ own use of self-presentation strategies, and links between popularity and self-presentation strategies. In response to scenarios in which popular classmates ask high-achieving students about their grades, most seventh- and eighth-grade participants (N = 312) believed they should be honest or give a vague response. In their own interactions, participants reported using strategies that hid grades more frequently than strategies that involved lying. Popularity was not related to adolescents’ use of self-presentation strategies, but self-presentation strategy beliefs varied by popularity, grade, and gender. Popular seventh-grade students believed high-achieving students should be honest about their grades and effort, whereas popular eighth-grade students believed they should claim to have studied less. Among popular eighth-grade students, girls were more likely than boys to believe they should give a vague response.
AdlerP. A.KlessS. J.AdlerP. (1992). Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary boys and girls. Sociology of Education, 65, 169–187. doi:10.2307/2112807
2.
BanerjeeR. (2002). Audience effects on self-presentation in childhood. Social Development, 11, 487-507. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00212
3.
BerndtT. J. (1988). The nature and significance of children’s friendships. Annals of Child Development, 5, 155-186.
4.
BerndtT. J. (2004). Children’s friendships: Shifts over a half-century in perspectives on their development and their effects. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 206-223. doi:10.1353/mpq.2004.0014
5.
BrownB. B.EicherS. A.PetrieS. (1986). The importance of peer group (“crowd”) affiliation in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 9, 429-455. doi:10.1016/S0140-1971(86)80029-X
6.
BrownB. B.SteinbergL. (1990). Academic achievement and social acceptance: Skirting the “brain-nerd” connection. Education Digest, 55, 55-60.
BukowskiW. M.SippolaL. K.NewcombA. F. (2000). Variations in patterns of attraction to same- and other-sex peers during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 36, 147-154. doi:10.10307//0012-1649.36.2.147
9.
CohenG. L.PrinsteinM. J. (2006). Peer contagion of aggression and health risk behavior among adolescent males: An experimental investigation of effects on public conduct and private attitudes. Child Development, 77, 967-983. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00913.x
10.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
11.
CzoppA. M.LasaneT. P.SweigardP. N.BradshawS. D.HammerE. D. (1998). Masculine styles of self-presentation in the classroom: Perceptions of Joe Cool. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 281-294. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/619356513?accountid=11072
12.
DweckC. S. (2002). The development of ability conceptions. In WigfieldA.EcclesJ. E. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 57-88). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13.
EderD. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Personal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58, 154-165. doi:10.2307/2112416
14.
ErdleyC. A.AsherS. R. (1998). Linkages between children’s beliefs about the legitimacy of aggression and their behavior. Social Development, 7, 321-339. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00070
15.
GalambosN. L.AlmeidaD. M.PetersonA. C. (1990). Masculinity, femininity, and sex role attitudes in early adolescence: Exploring gender intensification. Child Development, 61, 1905-1914. doi:10.2307/1130846
16.
GavinL. A.FurmanW. (1989). Age differences in adolescents’ perceptions of their peer groups. Developmental Psychology, 25, 827-834. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.827
17.
HarterS.MaroldD. B.WhitesellN. R.CobbsG. (1996). A model of the effects of perceived parent and peer support on adolescent false self behavior. Child Development, 67, 360-374. doi:10.2307/1131819
18.
HawleyP. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 279-309. doi:10.1353/mpq.2003.0013
19.
HetheringtonL.TownsendL. S.BurroughsD. P. (2001). “How’d you do on that test?”: The effects of gender on self-presentation of achievement to vulnerable men. Sex Roles, 45, 161-177. doi:10.1023/A:1013597626641
20.
JacksonC. (2003). Motives for “laddishness” at school: Fear of failure and fear of the “feminine.”British Educational Research Journal, 29, 583-598. doi:10.1080/014119032000099388
21.
JuvonenJ. (2001). The social functions of attributional face saving tactics. In SaliliF.ChiuC. Y.HongY. Y. (Eds.), Student motivation: The culture and context of learning (pp. 61-77). New York: Kluwer Academic/Penun.
22.
JuvonenJ.CadiganR. J. (2002). Social determinants of public behavior of middle school youth. In PajaresF.UrdanT. (Eds.) Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 227-297). Greenwich, CN: Information Age.
23.
JuvonenJ.MurdockT. B. (1993). How to promote social approval: Effects of audience and achievement outcomes on publicly communicated attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 365-376. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.365
24.
JuvonenJ.MurdockT. B. (1995). Grade-level differences in the social value of effort: Implications for self-presentation tactics in early adolescence. Child Development, 66, 1705-1964. doi:10.2307/1131904
25.
KeithT. Z. (2006). Multiple regression and beyond. Boston, MA: Pearson.
26.
KieferS. M.RyanA. M. (2008). Striving for social dominance over peers: The implications for academic adjustment during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 417-428. doi:1.1037/0022-0663.100.2.417
27.
KinneyD. A. (1993). From nerds to normals: The recovery of identity among adolescents from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education, 66, 21-40. doi:10.2307/2112783
28.
LasaneT.SweigardP.CzoppA.HowardW.BurnsE. (1999). The effects of student academic presentation on perceptions of gender and sociability. North American Journal of Psychology, 1, 173-188. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/619537550?accountid=11072
29.
LearyM. R.KowalskiR. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34-47. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34
30.
LearyM. R.NezlekJ. B.DownsD.Radford-DavenportJ.MartinJ.McMullenA. (1994). Self-presentation in everyday interactions: Effects of target familiarity and gender composition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 664-673. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.664
31.
MeijsN.CillessenA. H.ScholteR. H.SegersE.SpijkermanR. (2010). Social intelligence and academic achievement as predictors of adolescent popularity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 62-72. doi:10.1007/s10967-008-9373-9
32.
MertenD. (1997). The meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition, and conflict among junior high school girls. Sociology of Education, 70, 175-191. doi:10.2307/2673207
33.
MoffittT. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674
34.
RodkinP. C.FarmerT. W.PearlR.Van AckerR. (2000). Heterogeneiy of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14-24. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.36.1.14
35.
SchlenkerB. R.LearyM. R. (1982). Audiences’ reactions to self-enhancing, self-denegrating, and accurate self-presentations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 89-104. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(82)90083-X
36.
SchneiderB. H.WoodburnS.del Pilar Soteras del ToroM.UdvariS. J. (2005). Cultural and gender differences in the implications of competition for early adolescent friendship, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 5, 163-191. doi:10.1353/mpq.2005.0013
37.
SussmanS.PokhrelP.AshmoreR. D.BrownB. (2007). Adolescent peer group identification and characteristics: A review of the literature. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 1602-1627. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.11.018
38.
ThorntonB.AudesseR. J.RyckmanR. M.BurckleM. J. (2006). Playing dumb and knowing it all: Two sides of an impression management coin. Individual Differences Research, 4(1), 37-45. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/621144515?accountid=11072
39.
Troop-GordonW.AsherS. R. (2005). Modifications in children’s goals when encountering obstacles to conflict resolution. Child Development, 76, 568-582. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00864.x
40.
Troop-GordonW.ViscontiK. J.KuntzK. J. (2011). Perceived popularity during early adolescence: Links to declining school adjustment among aggressive youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31, 125-151. doi:10.1177/0272431610384488
