Because the mechanism of harm used in social aggression generally involves the manipulation of peer relationships, it is important to consider its social correlates. The current article uses social dominance theory as a frame to review developmental research on social aggression perpetration and three indicators of social position: sociometric status, perceived popularity, and social network position. Consistent with social dominance theory, social aggression is positively associated with indicators of social position that reflect influence in the peer hierarchy (i.e., perceived popularity and social network position). However, these behaviors are also negatively associated with indicators of social position that reflect likeability (i.e., sociometric status), suggesting that they are not without social trade-offs. Thus, depending on how social position is operationalized, social aggression can be associated with building or burning bridges to peers. Potential moderators and implications for intervention within school-based contexts are discussed.
Adler, P.A., & Adler, P. ( 1995). Dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in preadolescent cliques. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 145-162.
2.
Archer, J., & Coyne, S.M. ( 2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 212-230.
3.
Bjorkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K.M.J., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression . Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117-127.
4.
Bonacich, P. ( 1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1170-1182.
5.
Cairns, R.B., Cairns, B.D., Neckerman, H.J., Gest, S.D., & Gariépy, J.L. (1988). Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection? Developmental Psychology, 24, 815-823.
6.
Cappella, E., & Weinstein, R. ( 2006). The prevention of social aggression among girls. Social Development, 15, 434-462.
7.
Cillessen, A.H.N., & Mayeux, L. ( 2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147-163.
8.
Cillessen, A.H.N., & Rose, A.J. ( 2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102-105.
9.
Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology , 18, 557-570.
10.
Craig, W.M. ( 1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 123-130.
11.
Crick, N.R. ( 1996). The role of overt aggression, relational aggression, and prosocial behavior in the prediction of children’s future social adjustment. Child Development, 67, 2317-2327.
12.
Crick, N.R., & Grotpeter, J.K. (1995). Social aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722.
13.
Crick, N.R., Nelson, D.A., Morales, J.R., Cullerton-Sen, C., Casas, J.F., & Hickman, S.E. ( 2001). Relational victimization in childhood and adolescence: I hurt you through the grapevine. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 196-214). New York: Guilford.
14.
Crick, N.R., & Nelson, D.A. ( 2002). Relational and physical victimization within friendships: Nobody told me there’d be friends like these. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 599-607.
15.
Delveaux, K., & Daniels, T. ( 2000). Children’s social cognitions: Physically and relationally aggressive strategies and children’s goals in peer conflict situations . Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 672-692.
16.
Dijkstra, J.K., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. ( 2008). Beyond the class norm: Bullying behavior of popular adolescents and its relation to peer acceptance and rejection. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1289-1299.
17.
Eder, D. ( 1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58, 154-165.
18.
Ellis, W.E., & Zarbatany, L. ( 2007). Peer group status as a moderator of group influence on children’s deviant, aggressive, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 78, 1240-1254.
19.
Espelage, D.L., Holt, M.K., & Henkel, R.R. ( 2003). Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74, 205-220.
20.
Farmer, T.W. ( 2000). The social dynamics of aggressive and disruptive behavior in school: Implications for behavioral consultation. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 11, 299-321.
21.
Farmer, T.W., & Cadwallader, T.W. (2000). Social interactions and peer support for problem behaviors. Preventing School Failure , 44, 105-109.
22.
Farmer, T.W., Estell, D.B., Bishop, J.L., O’Neal, K.K., & Cairns, B.D. ( 2003). Rejected bullies or popular leaders? The social relations of aggressive subtypes of rural African American early adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 39, 992-1004.
23.
Fraser, M.W., Galinsky, M.J., Smokowski, P.R., Day, S.H., Terzian, M.A., Rose, R.A., et al. (2005). Social information-processing skills training to promote social competence and prevent aggressive behavior in the third grade. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1045-1055.
24.
Galen, B.R., & Underwood, M.K. (1997). A developmental investigation of social aggression among children. Developmental Psychology , 33, 589-600.
25.
Gest, S.D., Graham-Bermann, S.A., & Hartup, W.W. ( 2001). Peer experience: Common and unique features of number of friendships, social network centrality, and sociometric status. Social Development, 10, 23-40.
Hawley, P.H. ( 1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 97-132.
28.
Krackhardt, D. ( 1987). Cognitive social structures. Social Networks , 9, 109-134.
29.
LaFontana, K.M., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635-647.
30.
Lagerspetz, K.M.J., Bjorkqvist, K., & Peltonen, T. ( 1988). Is indirect aggression typical of females? Gender differences in aggressiveness in 11 to 12 year old children. Aggressive Behavior, 14, 403-414.
31.
Landau, S.F., Bjorkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K.M.J., Osterman, K., & Gideon, L. ( 2002). The effect of religiosity and ethnic origin on direct and indirect aggression among males and females: Some Israeli findings. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 281-298.
32.
Lansford, J.E., Costanzo, P.R., Grimes, C., Putallaz, M., Miller, S., & Malone, P.S. ( 2009). Social network centrality and leadership status: Links with problem behaviors and tests of gender differences. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 55, 1-25.
33.
Lease, A.M., Kennedy, C.A., & Axelrod, J.L. ( 2002). Children’s social constructions of popularity. Social Development, 11, 87-109.
34.
Meisinger, E.B., Blake, J.J., Lease, A.M., Palardy, G.J., & Olejnik, S.F. ( 2007). Variant and invariant predictors of perceived popularity across majority-Black and majority-White classrooms. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 21-44.
35.
Merton, D.E. ( 1997). The meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition, and conflict among junior high school girls. Sociology of Education , 70, 175-191.
36.
Mouttappa, M., Valente, T., Gallagher, P., Rohrbach, L.A., & Unger, J.B. ( 2004). Social network predictors of bullying and victimization . Adolescence, 39, 315-335.
37.
Neal, J.W. ( 2007). Why social networks matter: A structural approach to the study of social aggression in middle childhood and adolescence. Child & Youth Care Forum, 36, 195-211.
38.
Neal, J.W. ( 2008). Kracking the missing data problem: Applying Krackhardt’s cognitive social structures to school-based social network research. Sociology of Education, 81, 140-162.
39.
Neal, J.W. ( 2009). Network ties and mean lies: A relational approach to relational aggression. Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 737-753.
40.
Nishina, A. ( 2004). A theoretical review of bullying: Can it be eliminated? In C. E. Sanders & G. D. Phye (Eds.), Bullying: Implications for the classroom (pp. 36-56). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
41.
Parkhurst, J.T., & Hopmeyer, A. ( 1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence , 18, 125-144.
42.
Pelligrini, A.D. ( 2004). Bullying during middle school years. In C. E. Sanders & G. D. Phye (Eds.), Bullying: Implications for the classroom (pp. 36-56). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
43.
Pelligrini, A.D., & Bartini, M. ( 2001). Dominance in early adolescent boys: Affiliative and aggressive dimensions and possible functions. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly , 47, 142-163.
44.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., & Malle, B.F. ( 1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741-763.
45.
Prinstein, M.J., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310-342.
46.
Putallaz, M., Grimes, C.L., Foster, K.J., Kupersmidt, J.B., Coie, J.D., & Dearing, K. ( 2007). Overt and relational aggression and victimization: Multiple perspectives within the school setting. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 523-547.
47.
Rose, A.J., Swenson, L.P., & Carlson, W. ( 2004). Friendships of aggressive youth: Considering the influences of being disliked and of being perceived as popular. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 25-45.
48.
Rose, A.J., Swenson, L.P., & Waller, E.M. ( 2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40, 378-387.
49.
Rys, G.S., & Bear, G.G. ( 1997). Social aggression and peer relations: Gender and developmental issues. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43, 87-106.
50.
Salmivalli, C., Huttenen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. (1997). Peer networks and bullying in school. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38, 305-312.
51.
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15.
52.
Sentse, M., Scholte, R., Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. ( 2007). Person-group dissimilarity in bullying and its relation with social status. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 1009-1019.
53.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. ( 1999). Social dominance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., van Laar, C., & Levin, S. ( 2004). Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 25, 845-880.
55.
Simmons, R. ( 2002). Odd girl out: The hidden culture of aggression in girls . New York: Harcourt.
56.
Smith, P.K., & Ananiadou, K. ( 2003). The nature of school bullying and the effectiveness of school-based interventions. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 5, 189-209.
57.
Smith, P.K., Ananiadou, K., & Cowie, H. ( 2003). Interventions to reduce school bullying. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48, 591-599.
58.
Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R. , & Slee, P. (Eds.). (1999). The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. London: Routledge.
59.
Tiet, Q.Q., Wasserman, G.A., Loeber, R., McReynolds, S.L., & Miller, L.S. ( 2001). Developmental and sex differences in types of conduct problems. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10, 181-197.
60.
Tomada, G., & Schneider, B.H. (1997). Relational aggression, gender, and peer acceptance: Invariance across culture, stability over time, and concordance among informants. Developmental Psychology , 33, 601-609.
61.
Underwood, M.K. ( 2003). Social aggression among girls. New York: Guilford.
62.
Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. ( 2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer-valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 396-408.
63.
Walcott, C.M., Upton, A., Bolen, L.M., & Brown, M.B. ( 2008). Associations between peer-perceived status and aggression in young adolescents. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 550-561.
64.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. ( 1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge Press.
65.
Wiseman, R. ( 2002). Queen bees and wannabees: Helping your daughter survive cliques, gossip, boyfriends, and other realities of adolescence. New York: Crown.
66.
Xie, H., Cairns, B.D., & Cairns, R.B. ( 2005). The development of aggressive behaviors among girls: Measurement issues, social functions, and differential trajectories. In D. J. Pepler, K. C. Madsen, C. Webster, & K. S. Levene (Eds.), The development and treatment of girlhood aggression (pp. 105-136). New York: Routledge.
67.
Xie, H., Cairns, R.B., & Cairns, B.D. ( 2002). The development of social aggression and physical aggression: A narrative analysis of interpersonal conflicts. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 341-355.
68.
Xie, H., Farmer, T.W., & Cairns, B.D. ( 2003). Different forms of aggression among inner-city African-American children: Gender, configurations and school social networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 355-375.
69.
Xie, H., Swift, D.J., Cairns, B., & Cairns, R.B. ( 2002). Aggressive behaviors in social interaction and developmental adaptation: A narrative analysis of interpersonal conflicts during early adolescence . Social Development, 11, 205-224.
70.
Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J., Geiger, T.C., & Crick, N.R. ( 2005). Relational and physical aggression, prosocial behaviors, and peer relations: Gender moderation and bidirectional associations. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 421-452.
