This article provides an overview of the history of research on adolescence. In our view, the history of the scientific study of adolescence has had two overlapping phases and is now on the cusp of a third. The first phase, which began early in the 20th century and lasted about 70 years, was characterized by grand theoretical models that purportedly pertained to all facets of adolescent development. The major studies of adolescence during this period were atheoretical, descriptive accounts. The second phase, which began in the mid–1970s and continues today, has been characterized by more focused hypothesis testing, an interest in developmental plasticity and in diversity, and in the application of science to real-world problems. We are now seeing the emergence of a third phase, in which the field of adolescent development is serving as an exemplar of the sort of developmental science that can be used by policy makers and by practitioners to advance civil society and to promote positive development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benson, P. L. (1997). All kids are our kids: What communities must do to raise caring and responsible children and adolescents. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Boring, E. G. (1929). A history of experimental psychology. New York: The Century Co.
3.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental process. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development(5th ed., pp. 993-1028). New York: John Wiley.
5.
Damon, W., & Gregory, A. (2003). Bringing in a new era in the field of youth development. In R. M. Lerner& P. L. Benson (Eds.), Developmental assets and asset-building communities: Implications for research, policy, and practice(pp. 47-64). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
6.
Douvan, J. D., & Adelson, J. (1966). The adolescent experience. New York: John Wiley.
7.
Elder, G. H. (1974). Children of the Great Depression. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. Psychological Issues, 1, 50-100.
9.
Freud, A. (1958). Adolescence. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 13, 255-278.
10.
Haeckel, E. (1868). Naturliche Schopfungsgeschichte[Natural history of creation]. Berlin, Germany: Georg Reimer.
11.
Hall, G. S. (1904). Adolescence: Its psychology and its relations to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion, and education(Vols. 1-2). Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
12.
Hamburg, B. (1974). Early adolescence: A specific and stressful stage of the life cycle. In G. Coelho, D. A. Hamburg, & J. E. Adams (Eds.), Coping and adaptation(pp. 101-125). New York: Basic Books.
13.
Hamburg, D. A. (1992). Today’s children: Creating a future for a generation in crisis. NewYork: Times Books.
14.
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.
15.
Jones, M. C.,& Bayley, N. (1950). Physical maturing among boys as related to behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 41, 129-148.
16.
Lerner, R. M. (1991). Editorial: Continuities and changes in the scientific study of adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1, 1-5.
17.
Lerner, R. M. (2002). Concepts and theories of human development(3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Lerner, R. M., Fisher, C. B., & Weinberg, R. A. (2000). Toward a science for and of the people: Promoting civil society through the application of developmental science. Child Development, 71, 11-20.
19.
Lerner, R. M., & Galambos, N. (1998). Adolescent development: Challenges and opportunities for research, programs, and policies. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Annual review of psychology(Vol. 49, pp. 413-446). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
20.
Magnusson, D.,& Stattin, H. (1998). Person-context interaction theories. In W. Damon& R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development(5th ed., pp. 685-759). New York: John Wiley.
21.
Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology(pp. 159-187). New York: John Wiley.
22.
McCandless, B. R. (1970). Adolescents. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.
23.
Nesselroade, J. R., & Baltes, P. B. (1974). Adolescent personality development and historical changes: 1970-72. Monographs of the Society for Research in ChildDevelopment, 39(154).
24.
Offer, D. (1969). The psychological world of the teen-ager.New York: Basic Books.
25.
Overton, W. F. (1998). Developmental psychology: Philosophy, concepts, and methodology. In W. Damon& R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development(5th ed., pp. 107-187). New York: John Wiley.
26.
Petersen, A. C. (1988). Adolescent development. In M. R. Rosenzweig (Ed.), Annual review of psychology(Vol. 39, pp. 583-607). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
27.
Steinberg, L.,& Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. In S. T. Fiske, D. L. Schacter,& C. Zahn-Waxler (Eds.), Annual review of psychology(Vol. 52, pp. 83-110). Palo Alto, CA: Annual reviews.
28.
White, S. H. (1968). The learning-maturation controversy: Hall to Hull. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 14, 187-196.
