A Preliminary Study of Inclusive Special Education Services for Infants,Toddlers,and Preschool-Age Children in California

Abstract

A sample of early childhood special education (ECSE) administrators in California was surveyed to gather information about the structure and organizational components of inclusive services for infants, toddlers and preschool-age children. The results indicate that the availability of inclusive services and type of service delivery models vary according to the child's age and disability. Programs for infants tend to be home based, and many infants have no opportunities for educational services in settings with typically developing peers. Services for preschoolers tend to fall into two configurations: children with mild disabilities who are frequently fully included and children with severe disabilities and low-incidence disabilities who are more often partially included or placed in special day classes only. The services provided most frequently in inclusive programs are related services and consultation to families, community preschools, and other agencies. In many programs, special education teachers do not work with children on-site in the inclusive setting. Family services other than consultation are offered much less often, especially by preschool programs. The results suggest that although inclusive services are available in many local education agencies (LEAs) service delivery models may not be conducive to the implementation of interventions needed to support optimal social and developmental outcomes for children.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bailey, D. B. , & Simeonsson, R. J. (1988). Homebased early intervention. In S. L. Odom & M. B. Karnes (Eds.), Early intervention for infants and children with handicaps: An empirical base (pp. 199–215). Baltimore: Brookes.

Ballard-Rosa, M. , Cavallaro, C. , & Lynch, E. (1996, October). Inclusive education for young children in California. Perspectives from families and professionals. Final report by the Research in Early Childhood Special Education Project, California Department of Education, Sacramento.

Bricker, D. (1995). The challenge of inclusion. Journal of Early Intervention, 19(3), 179–194.

California Department of Education (CDE) . (1997). California special education programs—A composite of laws: Education Code Part 30, other related laws, and California Code of Regulations—Title 5 (19th ed.). Sacramento: Author.

Cole, K. N. , Mills, P. E. , Dale, P. S. , & Jenkins, F. R. (1991). Effects of preschool integration for children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58(1), 36–45.

Demchak, M. A. , & Drinkwater, S. (1992). Preschoolers with severe disabilities: The case against segregation. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 11(4), 70–83.

Division for Early Childhood (DEC) . (1993). DEC position on early intervention services for children birth to age eight. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

Education of the Handicapped Amendments of 1986, 20 U.S.C. $$ 1400 et seq.

Eiserman, W. D. , Shisler, L. , & Healey, S. (1995). A community assessment of preschool providers' attitudes toward inclusion. Journal of Early Intervention, 19(2), 149–167.

10.

Gallagher, J. J. (1992). The role of values and facts in policy development for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families. Journal of Early Intervention, 16, 1–10.

11.

Guralnick, M. J. , & Groom, J. M. (1988). Peer interactions in mainstreamed and specialized classrooms: A comparative analysis. Exceptional Children, 54, 415–425.

12.

Hanline, M. F. , & Hanson, J. J. (1989). Integration considerations for infants and toddlers with multiple disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14(3), 178–183.

13.

Jenkins, J. R. , Odom, S. L. , & Speltz, M. L. (1989). Effects of social integration of preschool children with handicaps. Exceptional Children, 55, 420–428.

14.

Johnson, L. J. , Gallagher, R. J. , LaMontagne, M. J. , Jordan, J. B. , Gallagher, J. J. , Hutinger, P. L. , & Karnes, M. B. (1994). Meeting early intervention challenges: Issues from birth to three (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes.

15.

Kjerland, L. , & Mendenhall, J. (1991). Comparison of integration practices for children birth to three and three to six: Results of a statewide survey of Minnesota's local school district programs. Eagan, MN: Project Dakota. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 337 995)

16.

Lamo$$y, S. , & Bricker, D. D. (1993). Integrated programs: Effects on young children and their families. In C. A. Peck , S. L. Odom , & D. D. Bricker , Integrating young children with disabilities into community programs: Ecological perspectives on research and implementation (pp. 249–270). Baltimore: Brookes.

17.

Odom, S. L. , & McEvoy, M. A. (1988). Integration of young children with handicaps and normally developing children. In S. L. Odom & M. B. Karnes (Eds.), Early intervention for infants and young children with handicap: An empirical base (pp. 241–267). Baltimore: Brookes.

18.

Odom, S. L. , & McEvoy, M. A. (1990). Mainstreaming at the preschool level: Potential barriers and tasks for the field. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10(2), 48–61.

19.

Peck, C. A. , Furman, G. C. , & Helmstetter, E. (1993). Integrated early childhood programs: Research on the implementation of change in organizational contexts. In C. A. Peck , S. L. Odom , & D. D. Bricker (Eds.), Integrating young children with disabilities into community programs: Ecological perspectives on research and implementation (pp. 187–205). Baltimore: Brookes.

20.

Peck, C. A. , Paylo, W. P. , Bettencourt, B. , Cooke, T. P. , & Appoloni, T. (1988). An observational study of partial integration of handicapped students in a regular preschool. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21, 1–4.

21.

Rosenkoetter, S. E. , Harris, A. H. , & Fowler, S. A. (1994). Bridging early services for children with special needs and their families: A practical guide for transition planning. Baltimore: Brookes.

22.

Rule, S. , Stowitschek, J. , Innocenti, M. , Striefel, S. , Killoran, J. , Swezey, K. , & Boswell, C. (1987). The social integration program: An analysis of the effects of mainstreaming handicapped children into day care centers. Education and Treatment of Children, 10, 175–192.

23.

Streifel, S. , Killoran, J. , & Quintero, M. (1987). Grouping handicapped and non-handicapped children in mainstreaming settings. The Functional Mainstreaming for Success (FMS) Project. Final report—Part 1. Logen: Utah State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 290 284)

24.

Turnbull, H. R., III , & Turnbull, A. (1990). The unfulfilled promise of integration: Does Part H ensure different rights and results than Part B of the Education of the Handicapped Act? Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10(2), 18–32.

25.

Wolery, M. , Holcombe-Ligon, A. , Brookfield, J. , Huffman, K. , Schroeder, C , Martin, C. G. , Venn, M. , & Fleming, L. A. (1993). The extent and nature of preschool mainstreaming: A survey of general early educators. The Journal of Special Education, 27(2), 222–234.