A practical model for systematic ecological assessment for daily planning purposes is described. The results of initial testing of this model are presented in a supported training and work experience program for special education inclusion assistants placed in inclusive preschools. In conjunction with traditional child-focused assessment results, the model provides a means for identifying and developing opportunities for facilitating child-to-child social interactions and the attainment of individualized goals and objectives in the routines and typical activities of inclusive preschool settings. Preliminary evaluation data suggest that, overall, the model produces more integrated developmental activities, more use of peer mediation, and a more play-based approach to discrete skill development. These results are compatible with the philosophy and methodology of developmentally appropriate early childhood education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bagnato, S. J., Neisworth, J. T., & Munson, S. M. (1989). Linking developmental assessment and early intervention: Curriculum-based prescriptions (2nd ed.). Rockville, MD: Aspen.
2.
Bailey, D. B., & Wolery, M. (Eds.). (1989). Assessing infants and preschoolers with handicapsColumbus, OH: Merrill.
3.
Benner, S. M. (1992). Assessing young children with special needs: An ecological perspectiveNew York: Longman.
4.
Bredekamp, S. (Ed.). (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
5.
Bredekamp, S., & Rosegrant, T. (1992). Reaching potentials through appropriate curriculum: Conceptual frameworks for applying the guidelines. In S. Bredekamp & T. Rosegrant (Eds.), Reaching potentials: Appropriate curriculum and assessment for young children (pp. 28--42). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
6.
Bricker, D., Bailey, E., Slentz, K., & Kaminski, R. (1989). Evaluation and programming system: For infants and young children. Assessment level II: Developmentally 3 years to 6 yearsEugene: University of Oregon.
7.
Bricker, D., Bruder, M. B., & Bailey, E. (1982). Developmental integration of preschool children. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 207--222.
8.
Bricker, D., & Cripe, J. J. W. (1992). An activity-based approach to early interventionBaltimore: Brookes.
9.
Bricker, D., Gentry, D., & Bailey, E. J. (1992). AEPS test. In D. Bricker (Ed.), Assessment, evaluation, and programming system (AEPS) for infants and children: Vol. 1. AEPS measurement for birth to 3 years (pp. 65--214). Baltimore: Brookes.
10.
Browder, D. M. (1987). Assessment of individuals with severe handicapsBaltimore: Brookes.
11.
Brown, L., Branston, M. B., Hamre-Nietupski, S., Pumpian, I., Certo, N., & Gruenewald, L. (1979). A strategy for developing chronological age appropriate and functional curricular content for severely handicapped adolescents and young adults. The Journal of Special Education, 13, 81--90.
12.
Cavallaro, C. C., Haney, M., & Cabello, B. (1993). Developmentally appropriate strategies for promoting full participation in early childhood settings. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 13, 293--307.
13.
Clark, E. A., Hill, B. R., & Eyrich, S. (1994). Student training manual: Guidelines for working with young childrenNorthridge: California State University, Northridge, Department of Family Environmental Sciences/Child Development and Family Relations Laboratory School.
14.
Cohen, L. G., & Spenciner, L. J. (1993). Assessment of young childrenNew York: Longman.
15.
Demchak, M. A., & Drinkwater, S. (1992). Preschoolers with severe disabilities: The case against segregation. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 11, 70--83.
16.
Downing, J., & Perino, D. M. (1992). Functional versus standardized assessment procedures: Implications for educational programming. Mental Retardation, 30, 289--295.
17.
Evans, W. H., Gable, R. A., & Evans, S. S. (1993). Making something out of everything: The promise of ecological assessment. Diagnostique, 18, 175--185.
18.
Falvey, M., Brown, L., Lyon, S., Baumgart, D., & Schroeder, J. (1980). Strategies for using cues and correction procedures. In W. Sailor, B. Wilcox, & L. Brown (Eds.), Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students (pp. 109--133). Baltimore: Brookes.
19.
Fox, L., & Hanline, M. F. (1993). A preliminary evaluation of learning within developmentally appropriate early childhood settings. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 13, 308--327.
20.
Hanline, M. F., & Fox, L. (1993). Learning within the context of play: Providing typical early childhood experiences for children with severe disabilities. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 18, 121--129.
21.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 411--420.
22.
Hart, B., & Rogers-Warren, A. (1978). A milieu approach to teaching language. In R. L. Schiefelbusch (Ed.), Language intervention strategies (pp. 193--235). Baltimore: University Park Press.
23.
Linehan, S. A., Brady, M. P., & Hwang, C. (1991). Ecological versus developmental assessment: Influences on instructional expectations. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 16, 146--153.
24.
Losardo, A., & Bricker, D. (1994). Activity-based intervention and direct instruction: A comparison study. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 98, 744--765.
25.
Lowenthal, B. (1991). Ecological assessment: Adding a new dimension for preschool children. Intervention in School and Clinic, 26, 148--151.
26.
Lowenthal, B. (1992). Functional and developmental models: A winning early intervention combination. Infant-Toddler Intervention, 2, 161--168.
27.
Odom, S. L., & McEvoy, M. A. (1988). Integration of young children with handicaps and normally developing children. In S. L. Odom & M. A. McEvoy (Eds.), Early intervention for infants and children with handicaps: An empirical base (pp. 241--267). Baltimore: Brookes.
28.
Warren, S., & Bambara, L. (1989). An experimental analysis of milieu language intervention: Teaching the action-object form. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 448--461.
29.
Welch, M. (1994). Ecological assessment: A collaborative approach to planning instructional interventions. Intervention in School and Clinic, 29, 160--164, 183.
30.
Wolery, M. (1994). Implementing instruction for young children with special needs in early childhood classrooms. In M. Wolery & J. S. Wilbers (Eds.), Including children with special needs in early childhood programs: Research Monograph of the National Association for the Education of Young Children (Vol. 6, pp. 151--166). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
31.
Wolery, M., Strain, P. S., & Bailey, D. B. (1992). Reaching potentials of children with special needs. In S. Bredekamp & T. Rosegrant (Eds.), Reaching potentials: Appropriate curriculum and assessment for young children (pp. 92--111). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
