Three theoretical models of early intervention practice are discussed in order to identify the common values that characterize each of them. Although the developmental, functional, and biological models were each developed by different sets of practitioners and for different purposes and populations of children, it is possible to infer convergent principles that can guide professional practice. Previous assumptions that these models are discrete are questioned, and two examples of convergent paradigms are analyzed in light of the common values identified here.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Als, H., & Brazelton, T.B. (1981). Assessment of behavioral organization in a preterm and a full term infant. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 20, 239–263.
2.
Berkeley, T.R., & Ludlow, B.L. (1989). Toward a reconceptualization of the developmental model. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 9(3), 51–66.
3.
Bredekamp, S. (Ed.). (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8.Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
4.
Bricker, W.A., & Bricker, D.D. (1974). An early language training strategy. In R.L. Schiefelbusch & L.L. Lloyd (Eds.), Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation, and intervention (pp. 431–468). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
5.
Carta, J.J., Schwartz, I.S., Atwater, J.B., & McConnell, S.R. (1991). Developmentally appropriate practice: Appraising its usefulness for young children with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 11(1), 1–20.
6.
Dunst, C.J., Lesko, J.J., Holbert, K.A., Wilson, L.L., Sharpe, K.L., & Liles, R.F. (1987). A systemic approach to infant intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 7(2), 19–37.
7.
Ensher, G.L., & Clark, D.A. (1986). Newborns at risk: Medical care and psycho-educational intervention.Rockville, MD: Aspen.
8.
Erickson, E. (1963). Childhood and society.New York: Norton.
9.
Holvoet, J., Guess, D., Mulligan, M., & Brown, F. (1980). The individualized curriculum sequencing model (II): A teaching strategy for severely handicapped students. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 5, 337–351.
10.
Korner, A.F. (1971). Individual differences at birth: Implications for early experience and later development. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 41, 608–619.
11.
Korner, A.F. (1989). Infant stimulation: The pros and cons in historical perspective. Zero to Three, 10(2), 11–17.
12.
Korner, A.F., Zeanah, C.H., Linden, J., Kraemer, H.C., Berkowitz, R.I., & Agras, W.S. (1985). Relation between neonatal and later activity and temperament. Child Development, 56(1), 38–42.
13.
Lewis, M., & Starr, M. (1979). Developmental continuity. In J.D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (pp. 653–670). New York: Wiley.
14.
Linder, T.W. (1990). Transdisciplinary play-based assessment: A functional approach to working with young children.Baltimore: Brookes.
15.
Meisels, S.J. (Ed.). (1979). Special education and development: Perspectives on young children with special needs.Baltimore: University Park Press.
16.
Snell, M.E. (Ed.). (1987). Systematic instruction of persons with severe handicaps. (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
17.
Strain, P.S., & Odom, S.L. (1986). Peer social initiations: Effective intervention for social skills. Exceptional Children, 52, 543–552.
18.
Switzky, H., Rotatori, A., Miller, T., & Freagon, S. (1979). The developmental model and its implications for assessment and instruction for the severely/profoundly handicapped. Mental Retardation, 17, 167–170.
19.
Thomas, A., & Chess, S. (1977). Temperament and development.New York: Brunner/Mazel.
