The Relationship Between Time in Integrated Environments and Developmental Gains in Young Children with Special Needs

Abstract

This article describes an investigation between time spent in integrated school settings and developmental gains. Subjects were 135 children with special needs, 58 of whom had Down Syndrome. Subjects resided in 14 locations across the United States, and all were enrolled in outreach sites of the Model Preschool Program for Children with Down Syndrome and Other Developmental Delays. Subjects were assigned to one of three levels of time (minutes) in mainstreamed environments. There were no significant differences between the three groups in rate of gains in any of the six domains. When data were analyzed for Down syndrome subjects only, a single significant difference was found in the domain of expressive language, favoring children in sites with no integration. The results suggest the variable of time in integrated settings lacks the power to substantially impact developmental outcome.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alpern, G.D. , & Boll, T.J. , (1972). Alpern-Boll developmental profile. Aspen, CO: Psychological Development Publications.

Biklen, D. , Lehr, S. Searl, S. & Taylor, S. (1987). Purposeful integration … Inherently equal (Report of the Technical Assistance for Parents Programs). Boston: TAPP Project.

Bricker, D.D. , Bruder, M.B. & Bailey, E. (1982). Developmental integration of preschool children. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 207--222.

Cooke, T.P. , Ruskus, J.A. Apolloni, T. & Peck, C.A. , (1981). Handicapped preschool children in the mainstream: Background, outcomes, and clinical suggestions. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1,(1), 73--83.

Gottlieb, J. (1982). Mainstreaming. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 17,(2), 79--82.

Kauffman, J.M. , (1989). The regular education initiative as Reagan-Bush Education Policy: A trickle-down theory of education of the hard-to-teach. The Journal of Special Education, 23, 256--278.

Newborg, J. , Stock, J. Wnek, L. Guidubaldi, J. & Svinicki, J. (1984). Battelle developmental inventory. Allen, TX: DLM.

Oelwein, P.L. , Fewell, R.R. & Pruess, J.B. , (1984). Developmental sequence performance inventory. Seattle: University of Washington, Exceptional Education Unit.

Oelwein, P.L., Fewell, R.R. & Pruess, J.B., (in press). The classroom assessment of developmental skills. Seattle: University of Washington.

10.

Odom, S.L. & McEvoy, M.A. , (1988). Integration of young children with handicaps and normally developing children. In S.L. Odom & M.B. Karnes (Eds.), Early intervention for infants and children with handicaps: An empirical base (pp. 241--267). Baltimore: Brookes.

11.

Peck, C.A. , & Cooke, T.P. , (1983). Benefits of mainstreaming at the early childhood level: How much can we expect? Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 3, 1--22.

12.

Snyder-McLean, L. (1987). Reporting norm-referenced program evaluation data: Some considerations. Journal of the Division for Early Intervention, 11, 254--264.

13.

Stafford, P.L. , & Rosen, L.A. , (1981). Mainstreaming: Application of a philosophical perspective in an integrated kindergarten program. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1,(1), 1--10.

14.

Vincent, L.J. , Brown, L. & Getz- Sheftel, M. (1981). Integrating handicapped and typical children during the preschool years: The definition of best educational practice. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1,(1), 17--24.